Spatial constraint of peatland butterfly occurrences within a heterogeneous landscape

Oecologia

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 53-61

  Nekola, Jeffrey C ^a   Kraft, Clifford E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Butterflies; Metapopulation; Nearest neighbor spatial analysis Ripley's K; Spatial pattern

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; HABITAT TYPE; METAPOPULATION; PEATLAND; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

GREAT LAKES (LAKE SUPERIOR); UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; CLOSSIANA; CLOSSIANA EUNOMIA; CLOSSIANA FREIJA; CLOSSIANA FRIGGA; CLOSSIANA TITANIA; COENONYMPHA INORNATA; EREBIA; EREBIA DISCOIDALIS; FRIGGA; INCISALIA; INCISALIA AUGUSTINUS; INVERTEBRATA; LEPIDOPTERA; LYCAENA DORCAS; LYCAENA EPIXANTHE; LYCAENIDAE; OENEIS JUTTA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 0036937254     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004420100782     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Burrough PA (1986) Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. Oxford University Press, New York
2. Davis JH, Howe RW, Davis GJ (2000) A multi-scale spatial analysis method for point data. Landscape Ecol 15:99-114
3. Dennis RLH, Eales HT (1999) Probability of site occupancy in the large heath butterfly Coenonympha tullia determined from geographical and ecological data. Biol Conserv 87:295-301
4. Diggle PJ (1983) The Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. Academic Press, New York
5. Ebner JA (1970) Butterflies of Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum Popular Science Handbook 12, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
6. Ehrlich PR, Murphy DD (1987) Conservation lessons from long-term studies of checkerspot butterflies. Conserv Biol 1:122-131
7. Ferge LA, Kuehn RM (1976) First records of Boloria frigga (Nymphalidae) in Wisconsin. J Lepid Soc 30:233-234
8. Gervais BR, Shapiro AM (1999) Distribution of edaphic-endemic butterflies in the Sierra Nevada of California. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 8:151-162
9. Haase P (1995) Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: Introduction and methods of edge correction. J Veg Sci 6:575-582
10. Hanski I (1999) Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes. Oikos 87:209-219
11. Hanski I, Kuussaari M, Nieminen M (1994) Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Metitaea cinxia. Ecology 75:747-762
12. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Lewis OT (1996) Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: Implications for metapopulation structure. J Anim Ecol 65: 725-735
13. Kraft CE, Sullivan PJ, Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Nekola JC, Johnson LE, Padilla DK (in press) Landscape patterns of zebra mussel inland lake invasions: Evaluating dispersal from distribution. J Appl Ecol
14. Krebs CJ (1985) Ecology. Harper and Row, New York
15. Kuehn RM (1983) New Wisconsin butterfly records. J Lepid Soc 37:228-235
16. MacArthur RH (1972) Geographical Ecology. Harper and Row, New York
17. Manly BFJ (1991) Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman and Hall, New York
18. Masters JH (1971a) Ecological and distributional notes on Erebia discoidalis (Satyridae) in the north central states. J Res Lepid 9:11-16
19. Masters JH (1971b) First records of Boloria eunomia (Nymphalidae) in Wisconsin. J Lepid Soc 25:149
20. Masters JH (1972) Critical comments on James A. Ebner's "Butterflies of Wisconsin." In: Keuhn RM, Masters JH (eds) Wisconsin Butterflies. Mid-Continent Lepidoptera Series 59, pp 5-11
21. Miller LD, Brown FM (1981) A catalogue/checklist of the butterflies of America north of Mexico. Lepidopterist's Society Memoir 2
22. Moilanen A, Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics: Effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79:2503-2515
23. Mousson L, Nève G, Baguette M (1999) Metapopulation structure and conservation of the Cranberry Fritillary Boloria aquilonaris (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) in Belgium. Biol Conserv 87:285-293
24. Nekola JC (1998) Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Lycaeniidae, Nymphalidae, and Satyridae) faunas of three peatland habitat types in the Lake Superior drainage basin of Wisconsin. Great Lakes Entomol 31:27-37
25. Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in bioigeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26:867-878
26. Nève G, Mousson L, Baguette M (1996a) Adult dispersal and genetic structure of butterfly populations in a fragmented landscape. Acta Oecol 17:621-626
27. Nève G, Barascud B, Hughes R, Aubert J, Descimon H, Lebrun P, Baguette M (1996b) Dispersal, colonization power and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Appl Ecol 33:14-22
28. Okubo A, Levin SA (1989) A theoretical framework for data analysis of wind dispersal of seeds and pollen. Ecology 70:329-338
29. Real LA, McElhany P (1996) Spatial pattern and process in plant-pathogen interactions. Ecology 77:1011-1025
30. Ripley BD (1977) Modeling spatial patterns. J R Star Soc Ser B 39:172-212
31. Roughgarden J, Gaines SD, Pacala SW (1987) Supply side ecology: The role of physical transport processes. Br Ecol Soc Symp 27:491-518
32. Saur JD (1988) Plant Migration. University of California Press, Berkeley
33. Shmida A, Ellner S (1984) Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetatio 58: 29-55
34. Swengel AB (1995) Butterflies of Northwestern Wisconsin. Madison Audubon Society, Madison
35. Thomas CD, Thomas JA, Warren MS (1992) Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92:563-567
36. Tilman D (1988) Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton
37. Venables WN, Ripley BD (1997) Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
38. Wisconsin Endangered Species List (1999) Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison
39. Wisconsin Rare Butterfly Working List (1996) Bureau of Endangered Resources, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison