Impact of inclusion in general physical education on students without disabilities

Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 230-245

  Obrusníková, Iva ^b   Válková, Hana ^b   Block, Martin E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b University of Virginia ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CASE STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PRIMARY SCHOOL; RESEARCH; SCHOOL CHILD; SCIENCE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPORT; STUDENT; WHEELCHAIR;

EID: 0037829348     PISSN: 07365829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/apaq.20.3.230     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Archie, V.W., & Sherrill, C. (1989). Attitudes toward handicapped peers of mainstreamed and nonmainstreamed children in physical education. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 319-322.
2. Block, M.E. (1995). Development and validation of the children's attitudes toward integrated physical education-revised (CAIPE-R) inventory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 60-77.
3. Block, M.E. (1999). Did we jump on the wrong bandwagon? Problems with inclusion in physical education. Palaestra, 15(3), 30-36, 55-56.
4. Block, M.E. (2000). Including children with disabilities in regular physical education: A guide for practitioners (2nd ed.). Baltimore, PA: Brookes.
5. Block, M.E., & Krebs, P.L. (1992). An alternative to the continuum of least restrictive environments: A continuum of support to regular physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 97-113.
6. Block, M.E., & Zeman, R. (1996). Including students with disabilities in regular physical education: Effects on nondisabled children. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13, 38-49.
7. Denzin, N.K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
8. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265-279.
9. Ellery, P.J., & Rauschenbach, J. (2000). Impact of disability awareness activities on nondisabled student attitudes toward integrated physical education with students who use wheelchairs. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(Suppl. 1), A106.
10. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hopewell, NJ: Houghton Mifflin Company.
12. Goodwin, D.L. (2001). The meaning of help in PE: Perceptions of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 289-303.
13. Goodwin, D.L., & Watkinson, E.J. (2000). Inclusive physical education from the perspective of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 144-160.
14. Greenwald, A.G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion and attitude change. In A.G. Greenwald, T.C. Brock, & T.M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-169). New York: Academic Press.
15. Knudson, D., & Morrison, C. S. (1997). Qualitative analysis of human movement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
16. LaMaster, K., Gall, K., Kinchin, G., & Siedentop, D. (1998). Inclusion practices of effective elementary specialists. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 64-81.
17. Lieberman, L.J., & Houston-Wilson, C. (2002). Strategies for inclusion. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
18. Loovis, E.M., & Loovis, C.L. (1997). A disability awareness unit in physical education and attitudes of elementary school studetns. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 768-770.
19. McKenzie, T.L., Alcaraz, J.E., Sallis, J.F., & Faucette, F.N. (1998). Effects of a physical education program on children's manipulative skills. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 327-341.
20. Murata, N. M., & Jansma, P. (1997). Influence of support personnel on students with and without disabilities in general physical education. Clinical Kinesiology, 51, 37-46.
21. rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Place, K., & Hodge, S.R. (2001). Social inclusion of students with physical disabilities in general physical education: A behavioral analysis. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 389-404.
23. Rarick, G.L., & Beuter, A.C. (1985). The effects of mainstreaming on the motor performance of mentally retarded and nonhandicapped students. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 277-282.
24. th ed.). Dubuque, IA: WCB/McGraw-Hill.
25. Siperstein, G.N. (1980). Instruments for measuring children's attitudes toward the handicapped. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts at Boston.
26. Slininger, D., Sherrill, C., & Jankowski, C.M. (2000). Children's attitudes toward peers with severe disabilities: Revisiting contact theory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 176-196.
27. rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
28. Tripp, A., French, R., & Sherrill, C. (1995). Contact theory and attitudes of children in physical education programs toward peers with disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 323-332.
29. Vogler, E.W., Koranda, P., & Romance, T. (2000). Including a child with severe cerebral palsy in physical education: A case study. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 316-329.
30. Weinberg, N. (1978). Modifying social stereotypes of the physically disabled. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 22, 114-124.