The unbearable lightness of healthcare policy making: A description of a process aimed at giving it some weight

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 57, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 483-487

  Scheel, I B ^a,b   Hagen, K B ^b   Oxman, A D ^b  

^a Department for Nutrition   (Norway)

^b NONE   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH POLICY; POLICY MAKING;

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORWAY; ORGANIZATION; POLITICS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; INSURANCE; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NORWAY; POLICY MAKING; RESEARCH DESIGN; SICK LEAVE;

NORWAY;

EID: 0037804123     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.57.7.483     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Oakley A. Experimentation and social interventions: a forgotten but important history. BMJ 1998;317:1239-42.
2. Caplan N, Morrison A, Stambaugh RJ. The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level: a report to respondents. Ann Harbor, MI: The University of Michigan, 1975:1-63.
3. Innvaer S, Vist GE, Trommald M, et al. Health policy makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: s systematic review. Health Services Research and Policy 2002;7:239-44.
4. Granados A, Jonsson E, Banta HD, et al. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup Report on Dissemination and Impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997;13:220-86.
5. Brugha R, Varvasovszky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning 2000;15:239-46.
6. Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Oxman AD. Active sick leave for back pain patients: all the players on side, but still no action. Spine 2002;27:654-9.
7. Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Herrin J, et al. A call for action: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to improve active sick leave for patients with low back pain. Spine 2002;27:561-6.
8. Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Herrin J, et al. Blind faith? The effects of promoting active sick leave for back pain patients. A cluster-randomized trial. Spine 2002;27:2734-40.
9. Parliamentary Report no 39 (1991-1992). Rehabilitation and work for occupational disability. Sick leave and disability pensions. Oslo: 1992.
10. Van Tulder MW, Esmail R, Bombardier C, et al. Back schools for non-specific low back pain. Cochrane Database. Syst Rev issue 4, 2000. Oxford: Update Software.
11. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 1998;8:113-39.
12. Ware JE jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
13. Bero L, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, et al. Getting research findings into practice: closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 1998;317:465-8.
14. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001;39 (suppl 2):II-2-45.
15. Sundberg A. Aktiv sykemelding for et inkluderende arbeidsliv. Dagens Naeringsliv 2002;Feb 14.
16. Grande A. Trygd uten trygg effekt. NHO har fortsatt klokkertro. Dagens Naeringsliv 2002;Feb 6.
17. Vollebæk L. Syk - men arbeidsfør. Dagens Medisin 2002;Apr 25.
18. Midre G. Bot, bedring eller brød. Om bedømming av sosial nød fra reformasjonen til velferdsstaten. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1995.