Scaling in sensitivity analysis

Ecology

Volumn 83, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 3299-3305

  Link, William A ^a   Doherty Jr , Paul F ^a  

^a PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Management decisions; Orcinus orca; Parameter transformations; Population matrix models; Prospective analyses for; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

DEMOGRAPHY; POPULATION MODELING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WHALE;

CETACEA; ORCINUS ORCA;

EID: 0037800380     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[3299:SISA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Benton, T. G., and A. Grant. 1996. How to keep fit in the real world: elasticity analyses and selection pressures on life histories in a variable environment. American Naturalist 147:115-139.
2. Brault, S., and H. Caswell. 1993. Pod-specific demography of killer whales (Orcinus orca). Ecology 74:1444-1454.
3. Caswell, H. 1997. Methods of matrix population analysis. Pages 19-58 in S. Tuljapurkar and H. Caswell, editors. Structured-population models in marine, terrestrial, and freshwater systems. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
4. Caswell, H. 2000. Prospective and retrospective perturbation analyses: their roles in conservation biology. Ecology 81:619-627.
5. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
6. Crouse, D. T., L. B. Crowder, and H. Caswell. 1987. A stage-based population model for loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology 68:1412-1423.
7. Doak, D., P. Kareiva, and B. Klepetka. 1994. Modeling population viability for the desert tortoise in the western Mojave Desert. Ecological Applications 4:446-460.
8. Ehrlén, J., and J. van Groenendael. 1998. Direct perturbation analysis for better conservation. Conservation Biology 12:470-474.
9. Gaillard, J.-M., M. Festa-Bianchet, and N. G. Yoccoz. 1998. Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival. Trends in Evolution and Ecology 2:58-63.
10. Heppell, S. S., H. Caswell, and L. B. Crowder. 2000. Life histories and elasticity patterns: perturbation analysis for species with minimal demographic data. Ecology 81:654-655.
11. Hunter, C. M., H. Moller, and D. Fletcher. 2000. Parameter uncertainty and elasticity analyses of a population model: setting research priorities for shearwaters. Ecological Modelling 134:299-323.
12. Kareiva, P., M. Marvier, and M. McClure. 2000. Recovery and management options for spring/summer Chinook salmon in the Columbia River basin. Science 290:977-979.
13. Nichols, J. D., and J. E. Hines. 2002. Approaches for the direct estimation of λ and demogrpahic contributions to λ, using capture-recapture data. Journal of Applied Statistics 29:539-568.
14. Olesiuk, P. F., M. A. Bigg, and G. M. Ellis. 1990. Life history and population dynamics of resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the coastal waters of British Columbia and Washington State. Reports of the International Whaling Commission Special Issue 12:209-243.
15. Pfister, C. A. 1998. Patterns of variance in stage-structured populations: evolutionary predictions and ecological implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 95:213-218.
16. Sæther, B.-E., and Ø. Bakke. 2000. Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81:642-653.
17. Wisdom, M. J., and L. S. Mills. 1997. Sensitivity analysis to guide population recovery: prairie chickens as an example. Journal of Wildlife management 61:302-312.