Direct perturbation analysis for better conservation

Conservation Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 470-474

  Ehrlén, Johan ^a,b   Van Groenendael, Jan ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031895159     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96420.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brault, S., and H. Caswell. 1993. Pod-specific demography of killer whales (Orcinus orca). Ecology 74:1444-1454.
2. Caswell, H. 1978. A general formula for the sensitivity of population growth rate to changes in life history parameters. Theoretical Population Biology 14:215-230.
3. Caswell, H. 1989a. Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
4. Caswell, H. 1989b. Analysis of life table response experiments. I. Decomposition of effects on population growth rate. Ecological Modelling 46:221-237.
5. Caswell, H. 1996a. Second derivatives of population growth rate: calculation and applications. Ecology 77:870-879.
6. Caswell, H. 1996b. Demography meets ecotoxicology: untangling the population level effects of toxic substances. Pages 255-292 in M. C. Newman and C. H. Jagoe, editors. Ecotoxicology: a hierarchical treatment. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.
7. de Kroon, H., A. Plaiser, and J. M. van Groenendael. 1986. Elasticity: the relative contribution of demographic parameters to population growth rate. Ecology 67:1427-1431.
8. Ehrlén, J. 1995. Demography of the perennial herb Lathyrus vernus. II. Herbivory and population dynamics. Journal of Ecology 83:297-308.
9. Levin, L. A., H. Caswell, T. Bridges, C. DiBacco, D. Cabrera, and G. Plaia. 1996. Demographic response of estuarine polychaetes to pollutants: life table response experiments. Ecological Applications 6: 1295-1313.
10. Mangel, M., and C. Tier. 1994. Four facts every conservation biologist should know about persistence. Ecology 75:607-614.
11. Royama, T. 1996. A fundamental problem in key factor analysis. Ecology 77:87-93.
12. Schemske, D. W., B. C. Husband, M. H. Ruckelhaus, C. Goodwillie, I. M. Parker, and J. G. Bishop. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75:584-606.
13. Silva, J. F., J. Raventos, H. Caswell, and M. C. Trevisan. 1991. Population responses to fire in a tropical savanna grass, Andropogon semiberbis: a matrix model approach. Journal of Ecology 79:345-356.
14. Silvertown, J., M. Franco, I. Pisanty, and A. Mendoza. 1993. Comparative plant demography: relative importance of life-cycle components to the finite rate of increase in woody and herbaceous perennials. Journal of Ecology 81:465-476.
15. Silvertown, J., M. Franco, and E. Menges. 1996. Interpretation of elasticity matrices as an aid to the management of plant populations for conservation. Conservation Biology 10:591-597.
16. van Groenendael, J. M., and P. Slim. 1988. The contrasting dynamics of two populations of Plantago lanceolata classified by age and size. Journal of Ecology 76:585-599.
17. van Groenendael, J. M., H. de Kroon, and H. Caswell. 1988. Projection matrices in population biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:264-269.
18. van Groenendael, J. M., H. de Kroon, S. Kalisz, and S. Tuljapurkar. 1994. Loop analysis: evaluating life history pathways in population projection matrices. Ecology 75:2410-2415.
19. van Tienderen, P. H. 1995. Life cycle trade-offs in matrix population models. Ecology 76:2482-2489.