In vitro cytotoxicity of five glass-ionomer cements

Biomaterials

Volumn 24, Issue 21, 2003, Pages 3853-3858

  De Souza Costa, Carlos Alberto ^a   Hebling, Josimeri ^a   Garcia Godoy, Franklin ^b   Hanks, Carl Thomas ^c  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Culture; Cytotoxicity; Glass ionomer cement; Odontoblast

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; CEMENTS; GLASS; IONOMERS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOXICITY;

CYTOTOXICITY;

CELLS;

BUFFER; FUJI II LC; FUJI IX GP; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC MOLAR; METHYLTETRAZOLIUM; PHOSPHATE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TETRAZOLIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VITREBOND; VITREMER; Z 100;

ARTICLE; CELL ASSAY; CELL COUNT; CELL LINE; CELL METABOLISM; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; EVALUATION; EXPERIMENT; FILTER; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; INCUBATION TIME; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; MATERIALS; ODONTOBLAST; PAPER; PLATING MEDIUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037785274     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00253-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Sasanaluckit P., Albustany K.R., Doherty P.J., Williams D.F. Biocompatibility of glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials. 14:1993;906-916.
2. Six N., Lasfargues J.J., Goldberg M. In vivo study of the pulp reaction to Fuji IX, a glass ionomer cement. J Dent. 28:2000;413-422.
3. Wilson A.D., Kent B.E. The glass-ionomer cement. a new translucent dental filling material J Appl Chem Biotechnol. 21:1971;313-318.
4. Palmer G., Anstice H.M., Pearson G.J. The effects of curring regime on the release of hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) from resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent. 27:1999;303-311.
5. Stanislawski L., Daniau X., Lauti A., Goldberg M. Factors responsible for pulp cell cytotoxicity induced by resin-modified glass ionomer cements. J Biomed Mater Res. 48:1999;277-288.
6. Wataha J.C., Hanks C.T., Craig R.G. In vitro synergistic, antagonistic, and duration of exposure effects of metal cations on eukaryotic cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 26:1992;1297-1309.
7. Lewis J., Nix L., Schuster G., Lefebvre C., Knoernschild K., Caughman G. Response of oral mucosal cells to glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials. 17:1996;1115-1120.
8. Oliva A., Ragione D., Salerno A., Riccio V., Tartaro G., Gozzolino A. Biocompatibility studies on glass ionomer cements by primary cultures of human osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 17:1996;1351-1356.
9. Schedle A., Franz A., Rausch-Fan X., Spittler A., Lucas T., Samorapoompichit P. Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers, and cements. Dent Mater. 14:1998;429-440.
10. Geurtsen W., Spahl W., Leyhausen G. Residual monomer/additive release and variability in cytotoxicity of light-curing glass-ionomer cements and compomers. J Dent Res. 77:1989;2012-2019.
11. 13C NMR studies of the interaction of eugenol, phenol, and triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate with phospholipid liposome as a model system for odontoblast membrane. J Dent Res. 67:1988;1438-1441.
12. Soheili Majd E., Goldberg M., Stanislawski L. In vitro effects of ascorbate and Trolox on the biocompatibility of dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 24:2003;3-9.
13. Leyhausen G., Abtahi M., Karbakhsch M., Sapotnick A., Geurtsen W. The biocompatibility of various resin-modified and one conventional glass-ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 19:1998;559-564.
14. Costa C.A.S., Vaerten M.A., Edwards C.A., Hanks C.T. Cytotoxic effects of current dental adhesive systems on immortalized odontoblast cell line MDPC-23. Dent Mater. 25:1999;434-441.
15. Wennberg A., Mjör I.A., Hensten-Pettersen A. Biological evaluation of dental restorative materials. a comparison of different test methods J Biomed Mater Res. 17:1983;23-36.
16. Costa C.A.S., Hebling J., Hanks C.T. Current status of pulp capping with dentin adhesive systems. a review Dent Mater. 16:2000;188-197.
17. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. St. Louis: Mosby, Year Book Inc., 1997. p. 146-52.
18. American Dental Association. ANSI/ADA Specification No 41. Recommended standard practices for biological evaluation of dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99:637.
19. International Organization for Standardization. Biological testing of medical, dental materials and devices - Part 1: Guidance on selection tests. Ref. 10993-1, Geneva: ISO, 1992.