Factors responsible for pulp cell cytotoxicity induced by resin-modified glass ionomer cements

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 277-288

  Stanislawski, L ^a,c   Daniau, X ^a   Lautie A ^b   Goldberg, M ^b  

^a Lab Biol Physiopathol Cranio F   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DES SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIES DE LILLE   (France)

^c Faculte de Chirurgie Dentaire   (France)

Author keywords

Cell culture; Cytotoxicity; Resin monomers; Resin modified glass ionomer

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; BIOMECHANICS; CELL CULTURE; CELLS; COPPER; ETHANOL; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; IONOMERS; MONOMERS; RESINS; SILVER; TOXICITY;

BIOMATERIAL ELUATES; ETHANOL ELUTION; IN VITRO; PULP CELL CYTOTOXICITY; PULP CELL VIABILITY; RESIN MODIFIED GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; UNPOLYMERIZED RESIN MONOMERS;

DENTAL CEMENT;

2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; GLASS IONOMER; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CYTOTOXICITY; DENTISTRY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PULP;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CELL SURVIVAL; CELLS, CULTURED; DENTAL PULP; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, PLANT;

EID: 0033022321     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:3<277::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-T     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972;132:133-135.
2. McLean JW. Alternative to amalgam alloys. Br Dent J 1984; 157:432-433.
3. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1995;8:59-67.
4. de Gee AJ, van Duinin RNB, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1996;75:1613-1619.
5. Wilson AD. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:425-429.
6. Davidson CL. Les ciments verres ionomères de protection. Le point de vue du chercheur. Real Clin 1991;2:325-330.
7. Stanley HR. Usage (preclinical) tests for biological evaluation of dental materials. In: Toxicity testing of dental materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1985. p 91-121.
8. Smith DC, Ruse NR. Acidity of glass ionomer cements during setting and its relation to pulp sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:654-657.
9. Hume WR, Wang J. Hydrogen ion diffuses poorly through dentin. J Dent Res 1986;65:726.
10. Müller J, Bruckner G, Kraft E, Hörz W. Reaction of cultured pulp cells to eight different cements based on glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1990;6:172-177.
11. Forss H. Release of fluoride and other elements from light-cured glass ionomers in neutrals and acidic conditions. J Dent Res 1993;72:1257-1262.
12. Wataha JC, Hanls CT, Strawn SE, Fat JC. Cytotoxicity of components of resin and other dental restorative materials. J Oral Rehab 1994;21:453-462.
13. Gerzina TM, Hume WR. Effect of dentin on release of TEGMA from resin composite in vitro. J Oral Rehab 1994; 21:463-468.
14. Hume WR. Influence of dentine on the pulpward release of eugenol or acids from restorative materials. J Oral Rehab 1994; 21:469-473.
15. Yoshikawa T, Hirasawa M, Tosaki S, Hirota K. Concentration of HEMA eluted from light-cured glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1994;73:133.
16. Barton TF, Kostoryz EL, Eick JD, Yourtee DM. Analysis of leachables from dental adhesive of different curing times. 1997; 73:73.
17. Bouillaguet S, Wataha JC, Hanks CT, Ciucchi B, Holz J. In vitro cytotoxicity and dentin permeability of HEMA. J Endodont 1996;22:244-248.