-
1
-
-
0029115472
-
Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations?
-
Solomon MJ, McLeod RS. Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations? Surgery 1995;118:459-67.
-
(1995)
Surgery
, vol.118
, pp. 459-467
-
-
Solomon, M.J.1
McLeod, R.S.2
-
2
-
-
0037097838
-
Randomised trials in surgery: Problems and possible solutions
-
McCulloch P, Taylor I, Sesako M, Lovett B, Griffin D. Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. Br Med J 2002;324:1448-51.
-
(2002)
Br Med J
, vol.324
, pp. 1448-1451
-
-
McCulloch, P.1
Taylor, I.2
Sesako, M.3
Lovett, B.4
Griffin, D.5
-
3
-
-
0032487606
-
Surgery and the randomised controlled trial: Past, present and future
-
Solomon MJ, McLeod RS. Surgery and the randomised controlled trial: past, present and future. Med J Aust 1998;169:380-3.
-
(1998)
Med J Aust
, vol.169
, pp. 380-383
-
-
Solomon, M.J.1
McLeod, R.S.2
-
4
-
-
0034785497
-
Randomized, controlled trials in surgery: Perceived barriers and attitudes of Australian colorectal surgeons
-
Gattellari M, Ward JE, Solomon MJ. Randomized, controlled trials in surgery: perceived barriers and attitudes of Australian colorectal surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1413-20.
-
(2001)
Dis Colon Rectum
, vol.44
, pp. 1413-1420
-
-
Gattellari, M.1
Ward, J.E.2
Solomon, M.J.3
-
5
-
-
0027439484
-
Clinical studies in surgical journals: Have we improved?
-
Solomon MJ, McLeod RS. Clinical studies in surgical journals: have we improved? Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:43-8.
-
(1993)
Dis Colon Rectum
, vol.36
, pp. 43-48
-
-
Solomon, M.J.1
McLeod, R.S.2
-
7
-
-
0032717613
-
Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: A systematic review
-
Ross S, Grant A, Counsell C, Gillespie W, Russell I, Prescott R. Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:1143-56.
-
(1999)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.52
, pp. 1143-1156
-
-
Ross, S.1
Grant, A.2
Counsell, C.3
Gillespie, W.4
Russell, I.5
Prescott, R.6
-
8
-
-
0032189568
-
Determinants of patient participation in clinical studies requiring informed consent: Why patients enter a clinical trial
-
Verheggen F, Nieman F, Ruud J. Determinants of patient participation in clinical studies requiring informed consent: why patients enter a clinical trial. Patient Educ Couns 1998;35:111-25.
-
(1998)
Patient Educ Couns
, vol.35
, pp. 111-125
-
-
Verheggen, F.1
Nieman, F.2
Ruud, J.3
-
9
-
-
0029002060
-
Volunteers or victims: Patients' views of randomised cancer clinical trials
-
Slevin M, Mossman J, Bowling A, Leonard R, Steward W, Harper P, et al. Volunteers or victims: patients' views of randomised cancer clinical trials. Br J Cancer 1995;71:1270-4.
-
(1995)
Br J Cancer
, vol.71
, pp. 1270-1274
-
-
Slevin, M.1
Mossman, J.2
Bowling, A.3
Leonard, R.4
Steward, W.5
Harper, P.6
-
10
-
-
84886642114
-
Participation in a clinical trial: The patients' point of view
-
Mattson ME, Curb JD, McArdle R. Participation in a clinical trial: the patients' point of view. Control Clin Trials 1985;6:156-67.
-
(1985)
Control Clin Trials
, vol.6
, pp. 156-167
-
-
Mattson, M.E.1
Curb, J.D.2
McArdle, R.3
-
11
-
-
0025957282
-
Patient's willingness to enter clinical trials: Measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation
-
Llewelyn-Thomas HA, McGreal MJ, Thiel EC, Fine S, Erlichman C. Patient's willingness to enter clinical trials: measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation. Soc Sci Med 1991;32:35-42.
-
(1991)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.32
, pp. 35-42
-
-
Llewelyn-Thomas, H.A.1
McGreal, M.J.2
Thiel, E.C.3
Fine, S.4
Erlichman, C.5
-
12
-
-
0028933322
-
Patients health care decision making: A framework for descriptive and experimental investigations
-
Llewellyn-Thomas HA. Patients health care decision making: a framework for descriptive and experimental investigations. Med Decis Making 1995;15:101-6.
-
(1995)
Med Decis Making
, vol.15
, pp. 101-106
-
-
Llewellyn-Thomas, H.A.1
-
13
-
-
0021339672
-
Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer
-
Taylor KM, Margolese RG, Soskolne CL. Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1984;10:1363-7.
-
(1984)
N Engl J Med
, vol.10
, pp. 1363-1367
-
-
Taylor, K.M.1
Margolese, R.G.2
Soskolne, C.L.3
-
14
-
-
85031165308
-
Treatment of colorectal cancer: What do patients want?
-
Keshava A, Solomon MJ, Findlay M, Butow P, Salkeld G, Roberts R. Treatment of colorectal cancer: what do patients want? ANZ J Surg 2002;72(Suppl):A23.
-
(2002)
ANZ J Surg
, vol.72
, Issue.SUPPL.
-
-
Keshava, A.1
Solomon, M.J.2
Findlay, M.3
Butow, P.4
Salkeld, G.5
Roberts, R.6
-
15
-
-
0034055473
-
What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre?
-
Ling J, Rees E, Hardy J. What influences participation in clinical trials in palliative care in a cancer centre? Eur J Cancer 2000;36:621-6.
-
(2000)
Eur J Cancer
, vol.36
, pp. 621-626
-
-
Ling, J.1
Rees, E.2
Hardy, J.3
-
17
-
-
0018739982
-
Determinants of nonparticipation in randomized controlled trials for the treatment of sarcomas
-
Barofsky I, Sugarbaker PH. Determinants of nonparticipation in randomized controlled trials for the treatment of sarcomas. Cancer Clin Trials 1979;2:237.
-
(1979)
Cancer Clin Trials
, vol.2
, pp. 237
-
-
Barofsky, I.1
Sugarbaker, P.H.2
-
18
-
-
0034605467
-
Surveys identify barriers to participation in clinical trials
-
Finn R. Surveys identify barriers to participation in clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1556-8.
-
(2000)
J Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.92
, pp. 1556-1558
-
-
Finn, R.1
-
19
-
-
0035119557
-
Can improved communication increase patient participation in randomised clinical trials?
-
Sawka CA, Pritchard KI. Can improved communication increase patient participation in randomised clinical trials? Eur J Cancer 2001;37:297-9.
-
(2001)
Eur J Cancer
, vol.37
, pp. 297-299
-
-
Sawka, C.A.1
Pritchard, K.I.2
-
20
-
-
0033807896
-
Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: A review of the literature
-
Ellis PM. Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: a review of the literature. Ann Oncol 2000;11:939-45.
-
(2000)
Ann Oncol
, vol.11
, pp. 939-945
-
-
Ellis, P.M.1
-
21
-
-
0023007738
-
Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment of cancer
-
Simes RJ, Tattersall M, Coates AS, Raghavan D, Solomon HJ, Smartt H. Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment of cancer. Br Med J 1986;293:1065-8.
-
(1986)
Br Med J
, vol.293
, pp. 1065-1068
-
-
Simes, R.J.1
Tattersall, M.2
Coates, A.S.3
Raghavan, D.4
Solomon, H.J.5
Smartt, H.6
-
22
-
-
0023022805
-
The use of expert surrogates to evaluate clinical trials in non-small cell lung cancer
-
MacKillop WJ, Ward GK, O'Sullivan B. The use of expert surrogates to evaluate clinical trials in non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 1986;54:661-7.
-
(1986)
Br J Cancer
, vol.54
, pp. 661-667
-
-
MacKillop, W.J.1
Ward, G.K.2
O'Sullivan, B.3
-
23
-
-
0024238840
-
How expert physicians would wish to be treated if they had genitourinary tract cancer
-
Moore MJ, O'Sullivan B, Tannock IF. How expert physicians would wish to be treated if they had genitourinary tract cancer. J Clin Oncol 1988;6:1736-45.
-
(1988)
J Clin Oncol
, vol.6
, pp. 1736-1745
-
-
Moore, M.J.1
O'Sullivan, B.2
Tannock, I.F.3
-
24
-
-
0034843353
-
Suffering in deference: A focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk
-
Kennelly C, Bowling A. Suffering in deference: a focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk. Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl 1):i23-8.
-
(2001)
Qual Health Care
, vol.10
, Issue.SUPPL. 1
-
-
Kennelly, C.1
Bowling, A.2
-
25
-
-
0034856293
-
Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: Implication for the use of decision support tools
-
Robinson A, Thomson R. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care 2001;10(Suppl 1):i34-8.
-
(2001)
Qual Health Care
, vol.10
, Issue.SUPPL. 1
-
-
Robinson, A.1
Thomson, R.2
-
26
-
-
0026596294
-
Is there a role for preference assessments in research on quality of life in oncology?
-
Till JE, Sutherland HJ, Meslin EM. Is there a role for preference assessments in research on quality of life in oncology? Qual Life Res 1992;1:31-40.
-
(1992)
Qual Life Res
, vol.1
, pp. 31-40
-
-
Till, J.E.1
Sutherland, H.J.2
Meslin, E.M.3
-
27
-
-
0034991194
-
Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments
-
Fagerlin A, Ditto PH, Danks JH, Houts RM, Smucker WD. Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments. Health Psychol 2001;20:166-75.
-
(2001)
Health Psychol
, vol.20
, pp. 166-175
-
-
Fagerlin, A.1
Ditto, P.H.2
Danks, J.H.3
Houts, R.M.4
Smucker, W.D.5
-
28
-
-
0034063575
-
Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: Findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments
-
Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, Johnston CB, Hamel MB, Lynn J, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48(5 Suppl):S187-93.
-
(2000)
J Am Geriatr Soc
, vol.48
, Issue.5 SUPPL.
-
-
Covinsky, K.E.1
Fuller, J.D.2
Yaffe, K.3
Johnston, C.B.4
Hamel, M.B.5
Lynn, J.6
-
29
-
-
0023185342
-
Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research
-
Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 1987;317:141-5.
-
(1987)
N Engl J Med
, vol.317
, pp. 141-145
-
-
Freedman, B.1
-
30
-
-
0034706254
-
For and against: Clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial
-
Weijer C, Shapiro SH, Cranley Glass K. For and against: clinical equipoise and not the uncertainty principle is the moral underpinning of the randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 2000;321:756-8.
-
(2000)
Br Med J
, vol.321
, pp. 756-758
-
-
Weijer, C.1
Shapiro, S.H.2
Cranley Glass, K.3
|