On the prescriptive utility of visitor survey research: A rejoinder to Manning

Journal of Leisure Research

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 119-127

  Stewart, William P ^a   Cole, David N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b USDA Forest Service Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Backcountry encounters; Crowding; Park visitor management

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; OUTDOOR RECREATION; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0037777755     PISSN: 00222216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18666/jlr-2003-v35-i1-613     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Becker, R., Jubenville, A., & Burnett, G. (1984). Fact and judgment in the search for social carrying capacity. Leisure Sciences, 6, 475-486.
2. Burch, W. (1981). The ecology of metaphor-spacing irregularities for humans and other primates in urban and wildland habitats. Leisure Sciences, 4, 213-231.
3. Burch, W. (1984). Much ado about nothing-some reflections on the wider and wilder implications of social carrying capacity. Leisure Sciences, 6, 487-496.
4. Cole, D., & Stewart, W. (2002). Variability of user-based evaluative standards for backcountry encounters. Leisure Sciences, 24, 313-324.
5. Driver, B., Brown, P., & Peterson, G. (1991). Research on leisure benefits. In B. Driver, P. Brown, and G. Peterson (Eds.) Benefits of Leisure. State College, PA: Venture. Pp. 3-11.
6. Heywood, J. (2002). The cognitive and emotional components of behavior norms in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences, 24, 271-282.
7. Lawson, S. & Manning, R. (2001). Solitude vs. access: A study of tradeoffs in outdoor recreation using indifference curve analysis. Leisure Sciences, 23, 179-191.
8. Manning, R. E. (1985). Diversity in a democracy: Expanding the recreation opportunity spectrum. Leisure Sciences, 7, 377-399.
9. Manning, R. E. (in press). Carrying capacity as "informed judgment": the values of science and the science of values. In W. Freimund & D. Cole (Comps.) Visitor Use Density and Wilderness Experience: Proceedings. USDA Forest Service Proc. RMRS-P-20. Ogden, UT: Rocky Mountain Research Station, Pp. 21-28.
10. McCool, S., & Cole, D. (2001). Thinking and acting regionally: Toward better decisions about appropriate conditions, standards, and restrictions on recreation use. The George Wright Forum, 18(3), 85-98.
11. More, T. (2002a). "The parks are being loved to death" and other frauds and deceits in recreation management. Journal of Leisure Research, 34, 52-78.
12. More, T. (2002b). The marginal user as the justification for public recreation: A rejoinder to Crompton, Driver, and Dustin. Journal of Leisure Research, 34, 103-118.
13. Noe, F. (1992). Further questions about the management and conceptualization of backcountry encounter norms. Journal of Leisure Research, 24, 86-92.
14. Roggenbuck, J., Williams, D., Bange, S., & Dean, D. (1991). River float trip encounter norms: Questioning the use of the social norms concept. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 133-53.
15. Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. A. (1986). Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
16. Shelby, B., Vaske, J., & Donnelly M. (1996). Norms, standards and natural resources. Leisure Sciences, 18, 103-123.
17. Stewart, W., & Cole, D. (1999). In search of situational effects in outdoor recreation: Different methods, different results. Leisure Sciences, 21, 269-286.
18. Stewart, W., & Cole, D. (2001). Number of encounters and experience quality in Grand Canyon backcountry: Consistently negative and weak relationships. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 106-120.
19. Vaske, J., & Donnelly, M. (2002). Generalizing the encounter-norm-crowding relationship. Leisure Sciences, 24, 255-270.
20. Wagar, A. (1964). The carrying capacity of wild lands for recreation. Forest Science Monograph 7. Washington, D.C.: Society of American Foresters.
21. Wagar, A. (1974). Recreational carrying capacity reconsidered. Journal of Forestry, 72, 274-278.
22. Williams, D., Roggenbuck, J., Patterson, M., & Watson, A. (1992). The variability of user-based social impact standards for wilderness management. Forest Science, 38, 738-756.