-
4
-
-
0035965716
-
-
(d) Tallman, K. A.; Pratt, D. A.; Porter, N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11827.
-
(2001)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.123
, pp. 11827
-
-
Tallman, K.A.1
Pratt, D.A.2
Porter, N.A.3
-
5
-
-
0034628643
-
-
and references therein
-
Kranenburg, M.; Ciriano, M. V.; Cherkasov, A.; Mulder, P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 915 and references therein.
-
(2000)
J. Phys. Chem. A
, vol.104
, pp. 915
-
-
Kranenburg, M.1
Ciriano, M.V.2
Cherkasov, A.3
Mulder, P.4
-
7
-
-
33947088922
-
-
Hoffmann, R.; Radom, L.; Pople, J. A.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Hehre, W. J.; Salem, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 6221. When σ* is a π-acceptor, this is generally termed negative hyperconjugation.
-
(1972)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.94
, pp. 6221
-
-
Hoffmann, R.1
Radom, L.2
Pople, J.A.3
Schleyer, P.V.R.4
Hehre, W.J.5
Salem, L.6
-
10
-
-
0001586585
-
-
Curtiss, L. A.; Redfern, P. C.; Raghavachari, K.; Rassolov, V.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 4703. Performed with the Gaussian-98 suite of programs. Gaussian 98, rev. A.7; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh PA, 1998.
-
(1999)
J. Chem. Phys.
, vol.110
, pp. 4703
-
-
Curtiss, L.A.1
Redfern, P.C.2
Raghavachari, K.3
Rassolov, V.4
Pople, J.A.5
-
11
-
-
0001586585
-
-
Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh PA
-
Curtiss, L. A.; Redfern, P. C.; Raghavachari, K.; Rassolov, V.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 4703. Performed with the Gaussian-98 suite of programs. Gaussian 98, rev. A.7; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh PA, 1998.
-
(1998)
Gaussian 98, Rev A.7
-
-
-
12
-
-
0035850379
-
-
Henry, D. J.; Parkinson, C. J.; Mayer, P. M.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 6750.
-
(2001)
J. Phys. Chem. A
, vol.105
, pp. 6750
-
-
Henry, D.J.1
Parkinson, C.J.2
Mayer, P.M.3
Radom, L.4
-
13
-
-
2042537501
-
-
Schleyer, P. v. R.; Jemmis, E. D.; Spitznagel, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6393.
-
(1985)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.107
, pp. 6393
-
-
Schleyer, P.V.R.1
Jemmis, E.D.2
Spitznagel, G.W.3
-
14
-
-
0141439646
-
-
See ref 8 and citations therein
-
See ref 8 and citations therein.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
0141774435
-
-
note
-
3 are also unlikely to be additive (10.9 + 6.4 = 17.3 kcal/mol).
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
0141774436
-
-
note
-
If hyperconjugation is operative, the C-O bond should be somewhat longer in the cases where Y is strongly ED. Indeed, r(C-O) in aminomethylperoxyl is 0.04 Å longer than that in methylperoxyl, 1.491 vs 1.450 Å. Moreover, the dioxygen moiety becomes more negative (-0.429) compared with methylperoxyl (-0.197), consistent with charge-transfer resonance structures; see the graphical abstract.
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
0141774437
-
-
note
-
• bond in trimethylaminoperoxyl weaker than in methylperoxyl by the difference of 3.7 (28.7 vs 32.4) kcal/mol.
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
0036070565
-
-
Font-Sanchis, E.; Allaga, C.; Focsaneanu, K.-S.; Scaiano, J. C. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1576.
-
(2002)
Chem. Commun.
, pp. 1576
-
-
Font-Sanchis, E.1
Allaga, C.2
Focsaneanu, K.-S.3
Scaiano, J.C.4
-
19
-
-
0000707428
-
-
(b) Bejan, E. V.; Font-Sanchis, E.; Scaiano, J. C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4059.
-
(2001)
Org. Lett.
, vol.3
, pp. 4059
-
-
Bejan, E.V.1
Font-Sanchis, E.2
Scaiano, J.C.3
-
20
-
-
0000608914
-
-
(c) Scaiano, J. C.; Martin, A.; Yap, G. P. A.; Ingold, K. U. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 899.
-
(2000)
Org. Lett.
, vol.2
, pp. 899
-
-
Scaiano, J.C.1
Martin, A.2
Yap, G.P.A.3
Ingold, K.U.4
-
21
-
-
0010857918
-
-
It is well-documented that the benzylic and allylic radical stabilization enthalpies are very similar. See, for example: Hrovat, D. A.; Borden, W. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 10460-10464.
-
(1994)
J. Phys. Chem.
, vol.98
, pp. 10460-10464
-
-
Hrovat, D.A.1
Borden, W.T.2
-
22
-
-
0141551149
-
-
In preparation
-
Although in 2 the radical spin is delocalized into the aromatic ring, addition of oxygen to the ortho and/or para positions does not occur in benzylic radicals because of the energetic penalty incurred for breaking aromaticity. Pratt, D. A.; Mills, J. H.; Porter, N. A. In preparation.
-
-
-
Pratt, D.A.1
Mills, J.H.2
Porter, N.A.3
-
23
-
-
0141551148
-
-
note
-
Hyperconjugation by definition requires that this interaction will exist between any electron-donating substituent and polarized C-X bond where X is more electronegative than C. However, it is usually not important to the homolytic reactivity of these compounds because their C-X bonds are relatively strong. This is not true of alkylperoxyl radicals that have very weak C-O bonds.
-
-
-
|