Development of the 'patient perspective on care and rehabilitation process' instrument (POCR)

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 402-411

  Krevers, Barbro ^a   Öberg, Birgitta ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Care process; Elderly; Patient perspective; Patient satisfaction; POCR (patient perspective on care and rehabilitation process); Quality of care

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONSTANTS AND COEFFICIENTS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GERIATRIC CARE; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; RELIABILITY; TELEPHONE; THEORETICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037739778     PISSN: 15940667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03324469     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Øvretveit J. Health service quality. Cambridge: University Press, 1992.
2. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988; 260: 1743-8.
3. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Michigan: Health Administration Press, 1980.
4. Strasser S, Aharony L, Greenberger D. The patient satisfaction process: moving toward a comprehensive model. Med Care Res Rev 1993; 50: 219-48.
5. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 509-16.
6. Sixma HJ, Kerssens JJ, van Campen C, Peters L. Quality of care from the patients' perspective: from theoretical concept to a new measuring instrument. Health Expectations 1998; 1: 82-95.
7. Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 1351-9.
8. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
9. van Campen C, Sixma H, Friele RD, Kerssens JJ, Peters L. Quality of care and patient satisfaction: a review of measuring instruments. Med Care Res Rev 1995; 52: 109-33.
10. Lee Y, Kasper JD. Age differences in ratings of medical care among older adults living in the community. Aging Clin Exp Res 1999; 11: 12-20.
11. Burnside I, Preski S, Hertz JE. Research instrumentation and elderly subjects. Image J Nurs Sch 1998; 30: 185-90.
12. Rockwood K. Integration of research methods and outcome measures: Comprehensive care for the frail elderly. Can J Aging 1995; 14 (Suppl 1): 151-64.
13. Krevers B, Närvänen A-L, Öberg B. Patients evaluation of the care process - within geriatric hospital care. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 482-91.
14. Harris LE, Weinberger M, Tierney WM. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. Med Care 1997; 35: 70-6.
15. Hutchinson A, Bentzen N, König-Zahn C, Eds. Cross cultural health outcome assessment; a user's guide. European Research Group on Health Outcomes, Drukkerij Bariet bv, Ruinen, 1996.
16. Linder-Pelz SU. Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med 1982; 16: 577-82.
17. Linder-Pelz S. Social psychological determinants of patient satisfaction: a test of five hypothesis. Soc Sci Med 1982; 16: 583-9.
18. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing 1985; 49: 41-50.
19. Wilde B, Larsson G, Larsson M, Starrin B. Quality of care from the elderly person's perspective: subjective importance and perceived reality. Aging Clin Exp Res 1995; 7: 140-9.
20. von Essen L, Sjöden P. Perceived occurrence and importance of caring behaviours among patients and staff in psychiatric, medical and surgical care. J Adv Nurs 1995; 21: 266-76.
21. Eldar R. A conceptual proposal for the study of the quality of rehabilitation care. Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 163-9.
22. Herr KA, Mobily PR. Comparison of selected pain assessment tools for use with the elderly. Appl Nurs Res 1993; 6: 39-46.
23. Sitzia J. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11: 319-28.