Visual search is facilitated by scene and sequence familiarity in rhesus monkeys

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 13, 2003, Pages 1455-1463

  Lee, Daeyeol ^a   Quessy, Stephan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Memory; Monkey; Scene; Search; Sequence learning

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; EYE TRACKING; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHESUS MONKEY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0037725145     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00176-7     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bichot N.P., Schall J.D. Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection. Nature Neuroscience. 2:1999;549-554.
2. Bichot N.P., Schall J.D. Priming in macaque frontal cortex during popout visual search: feature-based facilitation and location-based inhibition of return. Journal of Neuroscience. 22:2002;4675-4685.
3. Chun M.M. Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Science. 4:2000;170-178.
4. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual cortex guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology. 36:1998;28-71.
5. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science. 10:1999;360-365.
6. Chun M.M., Phelps E.A. Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience. 2:1999;844-847.
7. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L., Miezin F.M., Petersen S.E. Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science. 270:1995;802-805.
8. Donner T.H., Kettermann A., Diesch E., Ostendorf F., Villringer A., Brandt S.A. Visual feature and conjunction searches of equal difficulty engage only partially overlapping frontoparietal network. Neuroimage. 15:2002;16-25.
9. Doyon J., Song A.W., Karni A., Lalonde F., Adams M.M., Ungerleider L.G. Experience-dependent changes in cerebellar contributions to motor sequence learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 99:2002;1017-1022.
10. Epelboim J., Steinman R.M., Kowler E., Edwards M., Pizlo Z., Erkelens C.J., Collewijn H. The function of visual search and memory in sequential looking tasks. Vision Research. 35:1995;3401-3422.
11. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature. 392:1998;598-601.
12. Epstein R., Stanley D., Harris A., Kanwisher N. The parahippocampal place area: perception, encoding, or memory retrieval? Neuron. 23:1999;115-125.
13. Gilchrist I.D., Harvey M. Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology. 10:2000;1209-1212.
14. Grafton S.T., Hazeltine E., Ivry R. Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 7:1995;497-510.
15. Hayhoe M.M. Vision using routines: a functional account of vision. Visual Cognition. 7:2000;43-64.
16. Hayhoe M.M., Bensinger D.G., Ballard D.H. Task constraints in visual working memory. Vision Research. 38:1998;125-137.
17. Hazeltine E., Grafton S.T., Ivry R. Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding: a PET study. Brain. 120:1997;123-140.
18. Hollingworth A., Henderson J.M. Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 28:2002;113-136.
19. Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Visual search has no memory. Nature. 394:1998;575-577.
20. Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Search for multiple targets: remember the targets, forget the search. Perception and Psychophysics. 63:2001;272-285.
21. Hyman R. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psycholology. 45:1953;188-196.
22. Jenkins I.H., Brooks D.J., Nixon P.D., Frackowiak R.S.J., Passingham R.E. Motor sequence learning: a study with positron emission tomography. Journal of Neuroscience. 14:1994;3775-3790.
23. Jueptner M., Weiller C. A review of differences between basal ganglia and cerebellar control of movements as revealed by functional imaging studies. Brain. 121:1998;1437-1449.
24. Karn K.S., Hayhoe M.M. Memory representations guide targeting eye movements in a natural task. Visual Cognition. 7:2000;673-703.
25. Keele S., Boies S. Processing demands of sequential information. Memory and Cognition. 1:1973;85-90.
26. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Science. 4:2000;138-147.
27. Kristjansson A. In search of remembrance: evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science. 11:2000;328-332.
28. Lee D. Learning of spatial and temporal patterns in sequential hand movements. Cognitive Brain Research. 9:2000;35-39.
29. Lee D., Quessy S. Activity in the supplementary motor area related to learning and performance during a sequential visuomotor task. Journal of Neurophysiology. 89:2003;1039-1056.
30. Leonards U., Rettenbach R., Nase G., Sireteanu R. Perceptual learning of highly demanding visual search task. Vision Research. 42:2002;2193-2204.
31. Leonards U., Sunaert S., Van Hecke P., Orban G.A. Attention mechanisms in visual search - an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 12(Suppl. 2):2000;61-75.
32. Lu X., Hikosaka O., Miyachi S. Role of monkey cerebellar nuclei in skill for sequential movement. Journal of Neurophysiology. 79:1998;2245-2254.
33. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory and Cognition. 22:1994;657-672.
34. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception and Psychophysics. 58:1996;977-991.
35. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection. Visual Cognition. 7:2000;571-595.
36. Nakamura K., Sakai K., Hikosaka O. Neuronal activity in medial frontal cortex during learning of sequential procedures. Journal of Neurophysiology. 80:1998;2671-2687.
37. Neisser U. Cognitive psychology. 1967;Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
38. Nissen M.J., Bullemer P. Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology. 19:1987;1-32.
39. Peterson M.S., Kramer A.F., Wang W.X.F., Irwin D.E., McCarley J.S. Visual search has memory. Psychological Science. 12:2001;287-292.
40. Posner M.I., Cohen Y. Components of attention. Bouma H., Bouwhuis D.G. Attention and performance X: control of language process. 1984;531-556 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
41. Rauch S.L., Whalen P.J., Savage C.R., Curran T., Kendrick A., Brown H.D., Bush G., Breiter H.C., Rosen B.R. Striatal recruitment during an implicit sequence learning task as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Human Brain Mapping. 5:1997;125-132.
42. Rensink R.A. Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research. 40:2000;1469-1487.
43. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science. 8:1997;368-373.
44. Sakai K., Hikosaka O., Miyauchi S., Takino R., Sasaki Y., Pütz B. Transition of brain activation from frontal to parietal areas in visuomotor sequence learning. Journal of Neuroscience. 18:1998;1827-1840.
45. Schall J.D., Thompson K.G. Neural selection and control of visually guided eye movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 22:1999;241-259.
46. Schneider W., Shiffrin R.M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review. 84:1977;1-66.
47. Seidler R.D., Purushotham A., Kim S.G., Ugurbil K., Willingham D., Ashe J. Cerebellum activation associated with performance change but not motor learning. Science. 296:2002;2043-2046.
48. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review. 84:1977;127-190.
49. Simons D.J., Levin D.T. Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science. 1:1997;261-267.
50. Sireteanu R., Rettenbach R. Perceptual learning in visual search: fast, enduring, but non-specific. Vision Research. 35:1995;2037-2043.
51. Sireteanu R., Rettenbach R. Perceptual learning in visual search generalizes over tasks, locations, and eyes. Vision Research. 40:2000;2925-2949.
52. Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G. Statistical methods. 8th ed. 1989;Iowa State University Press, Ames.
53. Townsend J.T. Serial and parallel processing: sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can and should be distinguished. Psychological Science. 1:1990;46-54.
54. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psycholology. 12:1980;97-136.
55. Wolfe J.M. Visual search. Pashler H. Attention. 1998;13-73 Psychology Press, Hove, East Sussex, England.
56. Wolfe J.M. What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science. 9:1998;33-39.
57. Wolfe J.M., Klempen N., Dahlen K. Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 26:2000;693-716.
58. Wolfe J.M., Oliva A., Butcher S.J., Arsenio H.C. An unbinding problem? The disintegration of visible, previously attended objects does not attract attention. Journal of Vision. 2:2002;256-271.