Good scientific practice: Ethical codex of science: 1. Formulating ethical codex of science: A Pan-European initiative

Journal of B.U.ON.

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 7-10

  Stojanovic N ^b   Borojevic N ^a   Vuckovic Dekic Lj ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ONCOLOGY AND RADIOLOGY OF SERBIA   (Serbia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Data fabrication; Ethical codex; Good scientific practice; Ombudsman; Plagiarism; Scientific misconduct

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; BIOMEDICINE; EUROPE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; UNIVERSITY; YUGOSLAVIA;

EID: 0037723840     PISSN: 11070625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Banda E. European Science Foundation Policy Briefing, 2000: Good scientific practice in research and scholarship. Available at: http://www.esf.org
2. NIH Committee on scientific conduct and ethics. A Guide to the Handling of Scientific Misconduct Allegations in the Intramural Research Program at the NIH. January 12, 2001. Available at: www.od.nih.gov (last visited January 3, 2003).
3. Medical Research Council. Principles in the Assessment and Conduct of Medical Research and Publishing Results. London: MRC 1995.
4. Andersen D. From case management to prevention of scientific dishonesty in Denmark. Sci Engin Ethics 2000;6:25-34.
5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Recommendations of the Commission on Professional Self Regulation in Science: Proposals for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice. Available at: http://www.dfg.de
6. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Adopted by 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki 1964 as amended by the 52nd World Medical Assembly, Edinburg, Scotland, October 2000.
7. Schneider C. Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice: New institutional approaches in Germany. Sci Engin Ethics 2000;6:49-56.
8. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:36-47. (Version updated in 2001 is available at: www.icmje.org)
9. Smith R. Publication ethics: An embarrassing amount of room for improvement. Available at: www.bmj.com/talks (last visited January 3, 2003).
10. Vučković-Dekić Lj. Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice. The experience of Yugoslavia and other European countries. Arch Oncol 2001;2(Suppl):30-31.
11. Vučković-Dekić Lj, Radulović S, Stanojević-Bakić N et al. Good Scientific Practice-Ethical codex of Science. In: Vuckovic-Dekic Lj, Milenkovic P, Sobić V (eds): Ethics of Scientific Work in Biomedicine. Belgrade: Academy of Medical Science - Serbian Medical Society, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade 2002, pp. 161-173 (in Serbian with English summary).
12. Vučković-Dekić Lj. Archive of Oncology makes it clear that it is strictly committed to Good Scientific Practice (Editorial). Arch Oncol 2001;9:1.
13. Milenković P, Vučković-Dekić Lj. Good Scientific Practice - Duty of all scientists (Editorial). Bilt Hematol 2001;29:81-83.
14. Milenković P. Good scientific practice in research funding organizations. Arch Oncol 2001;9(Suppl 2):31-32.