From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 25-34

  Andersen, Daniel ^a,b  

^a Danish Committee on Sci Dishonesty   (Denmark)

^b Geodata Agency (GST)   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Authorship; Good scientific practice; Guidelines; Rights to use scientific data; Scientific fraud; Storage of scientific data

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CASE MANAGEMENT; DANISH MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL; DENMARK; ETHICS; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEGAL APPROACH; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; WRITING;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DANISH MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL; LEGAL APPROACH;

AUTHORSHIP; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CASE MANAGEMENT; DATA COLLECTION; DENMARK; ETHICS; ETHICS COMMITTEES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; GUIDELINES; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 0033765378     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-000-0019-x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Andersen, D., Attrup, L., Axelsen N, Riis P. (1992) Scientific dishonesty and good scientific practice, Danish Medical Research Council, Copenhagen.
2. Andersen D. (1998) Cases during DCSD's first five years, in: Annual Report 1997, The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, Copenhagen: 9-14.
3. The Danish committee on Scientific Dishonesty (1996) Annual Report 1995, The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, Copenhagen: 78-80.
4. The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty (1998) Annual Report 1997, The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, Copenhagen: 44.
5. The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty (1995) Annual Report 1994, The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, Copenhagen: 57-58.
6. The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty (1997) Annual Report 1996, The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, Copenhagen: 47-49.
7. The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty (1994) Annual Report 1993, The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, Copenhagen: 48-49.
8. The Danish committee on Scientific dishonesty (1995) Annual Report 1994, The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, Copenhagen: 58-59.
9. The Danish committee on Scientific Dishonesty (1997) Guidelines for the presentation of experimental protocols and reports, data documentation and data storage in basic health research, Danish Medical Bulletin 44: 87-88.
10. The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty (1997) Guidelines for the presentation of research plans and protocols, data documentation and data storage in clinical and clinical-epidemiological research, Danish Medical Bulletin 44: 88-89.
11. The Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty (1999) Guidelines on good scientific practice, Danish Medical Bulletin 46: 61-67.
12. Guidelines for the conduct of research within the public health service (1992) U.S. Department of health and human services.
13. EEC note for guidance (1990) Good clinical practice for trials on medicinal products in the European Community. CPMB working party on efficacy of medicinal products. Pharmacology and Toxicology 67: 361-372.
14. Good clinical research practice (1992) The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, London.
15. Harvard Medical School (1992) Faculty policies on integrity in science, Boston, MA.
16. Evered, D., Lazar, P. (1996) Misconduct in medical research. European Medical Research, Newsletter, April, Strasbourg.
17. Macrina, F.L. (1995) Scientific integrity, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
18. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1997) Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted for Biomedical Journals. Nordisk Median 112: 55-60.