Rationale and use of sound field systems: An update

Hearing Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 10-18

  Flexer, Carol ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ACOUSTICS; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN GROWTH; COMPREHENSION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; MICROPHONE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION; READING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND FIELD DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM; SPEECH DEVELOPMENT; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEACHING; WRITING;

EID: 0037716492     PISSN: 07457472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000293290.02251.08     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Crandell C, Smaldino J, Flexer C: Sound-field FM Amplification: Theory and Practical Applications. San Diego, CA: Singular Publication Group, 1995.
2. Flexer C: Enhancing Classrooms for Listening, Language, and Literary (Videotape). Layton, Utah: Info-Link Video Bulletin, 1998.
3. Boothroyd A: (1997). Auditory development of the hearing child. Scand Audiol 26(Suppl. 46):9-16.
4. Flexer C: Facilitating Hearing and Listening in Young Children, 2nd ed. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1999.
5. Anderson KL: Voicing concern about noisy classrooms. Educational Leadership 2001;April:77-79.
6. Ling D: On auditory learning. Newsounds 1986;11(1).
7. Erber N: Auditory Training. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, 1982.
8. Robertson L: Literacy Learning for Children Who Are Deaf of Hard of Hearing. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, 2000.
9. National Center for Education Statistics: National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP): 1992-2000 Reading Assessments. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research Improvement, 2001.
10. Darai B: Using sound field FM systems to improve literacy scores. Advance Sp-Lang Pathol Audiol 2000;10(27):5,13.
11. Flexer C: The startling possibility of soundfield. Advance Sp-Land Pathol Audiol 2000;10(36):5,13.
12. Flexer C, Biley KK, Hinkley A, et al: Using sound-field systems to teach phonemic awareness to pre-schoolers. Hear J 2002;55(3):38-44.
13. Crandell C: Effects of sound field FM amplification on the speech perception of ESL children. Ed Audiol Mono 1996;4:-5.
14. Pillow G: New personal soundfield from Audio Enhancement: A review. Ed Audiol Rev 1998;15:20.
15. Foster SM, Bracket D, Maxon AB: Cochlear implant users listening in noise: Benefits of sound field amplication. Presentation at AAA Convention, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 1997.
16. Universal design: Ensuring access to the general education curriculum. Res Connections in Special Ed 1999;5:1-2.
17. Boothroyd A: Optimizing FM and sound-field amplification in the classroom. Presentation at AAA Convention, Philadelphia, 2002.
18. Crandell C, Smaldino J: Classroom acoustics. Presentations at AAA Convention, Philadelphia, 2002.
19. Anderson KL: Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk (S.I.E.T.E.R.). Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association, 1989.
20. Anderson KL, Smaldino J: Listening Inventory for Education (L.I.E.E.) Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association, 1996.