Changing desiccation tolerance of pea embryo protoplasts during germination

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 54, Issue 387, 2003, Pages 1607-1614

  Koster, Karen L ^a   Reisdorph, Nichole ^a,b   Ramsay, Jodie L ^a,c  

^a W O Farber Center for Civic Leadership   (United States)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NORTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Desiccation tolerance; Embryo; Germination; Pea; Pisum sativum L.; Protoplast isolation

Indexed keywords

DEHYDRATION; ENZYME INHIBITION; SUGAR (SUCROSE); TISSUE;

PROTOPLASTS;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

RAFFINOSE; SUCROSE; WATER;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; GERMINATION; METABOLISM; PEA; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; PROTOPLAST;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; GERMINATION; PEAS; PROTOPLASTS; RAFFINOSE; SEEDS; SUCROSE; WATER;

PISUM SATIVUM; SATIVUM; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 0037712743     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erg170     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baker EH, Bradford KJ, Bryant JA, Rost TL. 1995. A comparison of desiccation-related proteins (dehydrin and QP47) in peas (Pisum sativum). Seed Science Research 5, 185-193.
2. Blackman SA, Obendorf RL, Leopold AC. 1992. Maturation proteins and sugars in desiccation tolerance of developing soybean seeds. Plant Physiology 100, 225-230.
3. Bryant G, Koster KL, Wolfe J. 2001. Membrane behaviour in seeds and other systems at low water content: the various effects of solutes. Seed Science Research 11, 17-25.
4. Bush DR. 1994. Proton-coupled sugar and amino acid transporters in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 44, 513-542.
5. Crowe JH, Crowe LM, Chapman D. 1984. Preservation of membranes in anhydrobiotic organisms: the role of trehalose. Science 223, 701-703.
6. Dussert S, Chabrillange N, Engelmann F, Hamon S. 1999. Quantitative estimation of seed desiccation sensitivity using a quantal response model: application to nine species of the genus Coffea L. Seed Science Research 9, 135-144.
7. Farrant JM, Walters C. 1998. Ultrastructural and biophysical changes in developing embryos of Aesculus hippocastanum in relation to the acquisition of tolerance to drying. Physiologia Plantarum 104, 513-524.
8. Gordon-Kamm WJ, Steponkus PL. 1984. The influence of cold acclimation on the behavior of the plasma membrane following osmotic contraction of isolated protoplasts. Protoplasma 123, 161-173.
9. Hoekstra FA, Van Roekel T. 1988. Desiccation tolerance of Papaver dubium L. pollen during its development in the anther. Possible role of phospholipid composition and sucrose content. Plant Physiology 88, 626-632.
10. Koster KL. 1991. Glass formation and desiccation tolerance in seeds. Plant Physiology 96, 302-304.
11. Koster KL, Lei YP, Anderson M, Martin S, Bryant G. 2000. Effects of vitrified and non-vitrified sugars on phosphatidylcholine fluid-to-gel phase transitions. Biophysical Journal 78, 1932-1946.
12. Koster KL, Leopold AC. 1988. Sugars and desiccation tolerance in seeds. Plant Physiology 88, 828-832.
13. Leborgne N, Teulieres C, Travert S, Rols MP, Teissie J, Boudet AM. 1995. Introduction of specific carbohydrates into Eucalyptus gunnii cells increases their freezing tolerance. European Journal of Biochemistry 229, 710-717.
14. Leprince O, Buitink J, Hoekstra FA. 1999. Axes and cotyledons of recalcitrant seeds of Castanea sativa Mill. exhibit contrasting responses of respiration to drying in relation to desiccation sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 1515-1524.
15. Leprince O, Deltour R, Thorpe PC, Atherton NM, Hendry GAF. 1990. The role of free radicals and radical processing systems in loss of desiccation tolerance in germinating maize (Zea mays L.). New Phytologist 116, 573-580.
16. Leprince O, Harren FJM, Buitink J, Alberda M, Hoekstra FA. 2000. Metabolic dysfunction and unabated respiration precede the loss of membrane integrity during dehydration of germinating radicles. Plant Physiology 122, 597-608.
17. Leprince O, Vertucci CW, Hendry GAF, Atherton NM. 1995. The expression of desiccation-induced damage in orthodox seeds is a function of oxygen and temperature. Physiologia Plantarum 94, 233-240.
18. Liang Y, Sun WQ. 2000. Desiccation tolerance of recalcitrant Theobroma cacao embryonic axes: the optimal drying rate and its physiological basis. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1911-1919.
19. Murai M, Yoshida S. 1998. Evidence for the cell wall involvement in temporal changes in freezing tolerance of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers during cold acclimation. Plant and Cell Physiology 39, 97-105.
20. Pammenter NW, Berjak P. 1999. A review of recalcitrant seed physiology in relation to desiccation-tolerance mechanisms. Seed Science Research 9, 13-37.
21. Patrick JW, Offler CE. 2001. Compartmentation of transport and transfer events in developing seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 551-564.
22. Ramsay JL. 2002. Ultrastructure of pea embryonic axes (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) and the associated loss of desiccation tolerance during germination. PhD dissertation, The University of South Dakota.
23. Reisdorph N, Koster KL. 1999. Progressive loss of desiccation tolerance in germinating pea (Pisum sativum) seeds. Physiologia Plantarum 105, 266-271.
24. Senaratna T, McKersie BD, Stinson RH. 1985. Antioxidant levels in germinating soybean seed axes in relation to free radical and dehydration tolerance. Plant Physiology 78, 168-171.
25. Sun WQ. 1999. Desiccation sensitivity of recalcitrant seeds and germinated orthodox seeds: can germinated orthodox seeds serve as a model system for studies of recalcitrance? In: Marzalina M, Khoo KC, Jayanthi N, Tsan FY, Krishnapillay B, eds. Recalcitrant seeds. Proceedings of IUFRO Seed Symposium 1998. Kuala Lumpur: Forest Research Institute Malaysia, 29-42.
26. Sun WQ, Liang Y. 2001. Discrete levels of desiccation sensitivity in various seeds as determined by the equilibrium dehydration method. Seed Science Research 11, 317-323.
27. Travert S, Valerio L, Fouraste I, Boudet AM, Teulieres C. 1997. Enrichment in soluble sugars of two eucalyptus cell-suspension cultures by various treatments enhances their frost tolerance via a non-colligative mechanism. Plant Physiology 114, 1433-1442.
28. Uemura M, Joseph RA, Steponkus PL. 1995. Cold acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Effect on plasma membrane lipid composition and freeze-induced lesions. Plant Physiology 109, 15-30.
29. Uemura M, Steponkus PL. 1998. Effect of artificial manipulation of intracellular sugar content on the incidence of freeze-induced membrane lesions of protoplasts isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Plant Physiology 117, S-109.
30. Vertucci CW, Farrant JM. 1995. Acquisition and loss of desiccation tolerance. In: Kigel J, Galili G, eds. Seed development and germination. Marcel Dekker, New York, 237-271.
31. Walters C. 1999. Levels of recalcitrance in seeds. In: Marzalina M, Khoo KC, Jayanthi N, Tsan FY, Krishnapillay B, eds. Recalcitrant seeds. Proceedings of IUFRO Seed Symposium 1998. Kuala Lumpur: Forest Research Institute Malaysia, 1-13.
32. Walters C, Pammenter NW, Berjak P, Crane J. 2001. Desiccation damage, accelerated ageing and respiration in desiccation-tolerant and -sensitive seeds. Seed Science Research 11, 135-148.
33. Widholm JM. 1972. The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining viability of cultured plant cells. Stain Technology 47, 189-194.
34. Xiao L, Koster KL. 2001.Desiccation tolerance of protoplasts isolated from pea embryos. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 2105-2114.
35. Zar JH. 1996. Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.