Electronic publishing: Research issues for academic librarians and users

Library Trends

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 614-635+690

  Tenopir, Carol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037706161     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Albanese, A. (2001). Revolution or evolution: Trends in electronic scholarly publishing. Library Journal, 126(18), 48-51.
2. Allen, B. L. (1988). Text structures and the user-intermediary interaction. RQ, 27, 535-541.
3. Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2000). Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing, 1.
4. Auster, E., & Lawton, S. B. (1984). Search interview techniques and information gain as antecedents of user satisfaction with online retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35, 90-103.
5. Bates, M.J. (1979) Information search tactics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 30, 205-214.
6. Bates, M.J. (1981). Search techniques. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 16, pp. 139-169). White Plains, NY: Industry Publications, Inc.
7. Belkin, N. J. (1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5, 133-143.
8. Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R. N., & Brooks, H. M. (1982). ASK for information retrieval: Part I. Background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2), 61-71.
9. Biggs, M. (1989). Information overload and information seekers: What we know about them. The Reference Librarian, 25/26, 411-429.
10. Borgman, C. (1984). Psychological research in human-computer interaction. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 19, pp. 33-64). White Plains, NY: Industry Publications, Inc.
11. Borgman, C. (1989). All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences. Information Processing & Management, 25, 237-239.
12. Brown, C. M. (1999). Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 929-943.
13. Bunge, C. A. (1984). Interpersonal dimensions of the reference interview: A historical review of the literature. Drexel Library Quarterly, 20, 4-23.
14. Davis, P. (2002a). The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior - A 2000 update. College & Research Libraries, 63(1), 53-60.
15. Davis, P. (2002b). Patterns in electronic journal usage: Challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College & Research Libraries, 63(6), 484-497.
16. Davis, P., & Cohen, S. (2001). The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior: 1996-1999. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 52(4), 309-314.
17. Dervin, B., & Dewdney, P. (1986). Neutral questioning: A new approach to the reference interview. RQ, 25, 506-512.
18. D'Esposito, J. E., & Gardner, R. M. (1999). University students' perceptions of the Internet: An exploratory study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(6), 456-461.
19. Dewdney, P., & Mitchell, G. (1997). Asking "why" questions in the reference interview: A theoretical justification. Library Quarterly, 67(1), 50-71.
20. Diedrichs, C. P. (2001). E-journals: The OhioLINKexperience. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 25(2), 191-210.
21. Drenth, H., Morris, A., & Tseng, G. (1991). Expert systems as information intermediaries. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 26, pp. 113-154). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
22. Duggan, A., Hess, B., Morgan, D., Kim, S., & Wilson, K. (1999, April). Measuring students attitude toward educational use of the Internet. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. ED429117.
23. Eason, K. D., Yu, L., & Harker, S. (2000). The use and usefulness of functions in electronic journals: The experience of the SuperJournal project. Program, 34(1), 1-28.
24. Fenichel, C. H. (1980-1981). The process of searching online bibliographic databases: A review of research. Library Research, 2, 107-127.
25. Fidel, R. (1985). Moves in online searching. Online Review, 9, 61-74.
26. Grimes, D. J., & Boening, C. H. (2001). Worries with the Web: A look at student use of Web resources. College & Research Libraries, 62(1), 11-23.
27. Harter, S. P., & Hert, C. A. (1997). Evaluation of information retrieval systems: Approaches, issues, and methods. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 32, pp.3-94). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
28. Hawkins, D. (1982). Online bibliographic search strategy development. Online, 6(3), 12-19.
29. Herring, S. D. (2001). Faculty acceptance of the World Wide Web for student research. College & Research Libraries, 62(3), 251-258.
30. Hopkins, R. L. (1995). Countering information overload: The role of the librarian. In J. B. Whitlach (Ed.), Library Users and References Services: Special Reports (pp. 305-333). New York: Haworth Press.
31. Hunter, R. N. (1991). Successes and failures of patrons searching the online catalog at a large academic library: A transaction log analysis. RQ, 30, 395-402.
32. Ingwersen, P. (1999). Cognitive information retrieval. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 34, pp.3-52). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
33. King, D. W., McDonald, D. D., & Roderer, N. K. (1981). Scientific journals in the United States: Their production, use, and economics. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company.
34. King, D. W., & Tenopir, C. (2001). Using and reading scholarly literature. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 34, pp. 423-477). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
35. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences in the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14) 1306-1320.
36. rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Phoenix, AZ. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444208.
37. Kochen, M., & Tagliacozzo, R. (1974). Matching authors and readers of scientific papers. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10, 197-210.
38. Lin, C. A. (1999). Uses and gratifications. In G. Stone, M. Singletary, & V.P. Richmond (Eds.), Clarifying communication theories: A hands-on approach (pp. 199-208). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
39. Lubans, J. (1998). How first-year university students use and regard Internet resources. Retrieved March 19, 2003, from http://www.lib.duke.edu/lubans/docs/1styear/firstyear.html.
40. Lynch, M. J. (1978). Reference interviews in public libraries. Library Quarterly, 48, 131-138.
41. McBride, K. B., & Dickstein, R. (1998). The Web demands critical reading by students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(28), B6.
42. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43. Meadows, A.J. (1974). Communication in science. London: Butterworths.
44. Mercado, H. (1999). Library instruction and online database searching. Reference Services Review, 27(3), 259-265.
45. Nahl, D., & Tenopir, C. (1996). Affective and cognitive searching behavior of novice end-users of a full-text database. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(4), 276-286.
46. Peters, T. A. (1989). When smart people fail: An analysis of the transaction log of an online public access catalog. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 15(5), 267-273.
47. Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 35, pp. 79-113). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
48. Pottenger, W. M., Callahan, M. R., & Padgett, M. A. (2001). Distributed information management. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 35, pp. 79-113). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
49. Pullinger, D. J. (1999). Academics and the new information environment: The impact of local factors on use of electronic journals. Journal of Information Science, 25(2), 164-172.
50. Pullinger, D., & Baldwin, C. (2002). Electronic journals and user behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Deedot Press.
51. Radford, M. L. (1996). Communication theory applied to the reference encounter: An analysis of critical incidents. Library Quarterly, 66(2), 123-137.
52. Rice, J. (1989). The hidden role of librarians. Library Journal, 114(1), 57-59.
53. Robins, D. (1998). Dynamics and dimensions of user information problems as foci of interaction in information retrieval. Proceedings of the 61st ASIS Annual Meeting, October 25-29, 1998, Pittsburgh (Vol. 35, pp. 327-341).
54. Saracevic, T., & Kantor, P. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving, II: Users, questions, and effectiveness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39, 177-216.
55. Spink, A., Goodrum, A., & Robins, D. (1998). Elicitation behavior during mediated information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 34(2/3), 257-273.
56. Spink, A., Wolfram, D., & Jansen, B. J. (2001). Searching the Web: The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 226-234.
57. Taylor, N., & Penhale, S. (1988). End-user searching and bibliographic instruction. In T. B. Mensching & K.J. Stanger (Eds.), Bibliographic instruction and computer database searching: Papers presented at the Fourteenth Library Instruction Conference held at Eastern Michigan University May 8-9, 1986 (pp. 57-74). Ann Arbor, MI: Pierian Press.
58. Taylor, R. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29(3), 178-194.
59. Tenopir, C. (1984). Full text databases. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 19 pp. 215-246.) White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications, Inc.
60. Tenopir, C. (1999). Database use in academic libraries. Library Journal, 124, 36-38.
61. Tenopir, C., & Ennis, L. (1998). The impact of digital reference on librarians and library users. Online, 22(6), 84-88.
62. Tenopir, C., & Ennis, L. (2001). Reference services in the new millennium. Online, 25(4), 40-45.
63. Tenopir, C., & Ennis, L. (2002). A decade of digital reference: 1991-2001. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 41(3), 264-273.
64. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2000). Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Washington, D.C.: Special Libraries Association.
65. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2001). The use and value of scientific journals: Past, present, and future. Serials, 14, 113-120.
66. Tenopir, C., Nahl-Jakobovits, D., & Howard, D. L. (1991). Strategies and assessments online: Novices' experience. Library & Information Science Research, 13, 237-266.
67. Tenopir, C., & Read, E. (2000). Patterns of database use in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries, 61(3), 234-246.
68. Wallace, P. M. (1993). How do patrons search the online catalog when no one's looking? Transaction log analysis and implications for bibliographic instruction and system design. RQ 33(2), 239-252.
69. Wang, P. (2001). Methodologies and methods for user behavioral research. In M. E. Williams (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 34, pp. 53-99). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
70. Wang, P., Hawk, W. B., & Tenopir, C. (2002). Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources: An exploratory study using a holistic approach. Information Processing and Management, 36(2), 229-251.
71. Wei He, P., & Jacobson, T. E. (1996). What are they doing with the Internet? A study of user information seeking behaviors. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 1(1), 31-51.
72. White, M. D. (1998). Questions in reference interviews. Journal of Documentation, 54(4), 443-465.
73. Wildemuth, B. M., de Bliek, R., He, S., & Friedman, C. (1992). Search moves made by novice end users (1). Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 1992 (pp. 154-161).
74. Wu, M. M. (1992). Information interaction dialog: A study of patron elicitation in the information retrieval interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, Rutgers University.
75. Zink, S. D. (1991). Monitoring user search success through transaction log analysis: The WolfPAC example. Reference Services Review, 19(1), 49-56.