Solution versus solid-state structure of ytterbium heterobimetallic catalysts

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 18, 2003, Pages 5549-5558

  Di Bari, Lorenzo ^a   Lelli, Moreno ^a,b   Pintacuda, Guido ^c   Pescitelli, Gennaro ^a   Marchetti, Fabio ^a   Salvadori, Piero ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE   (Italy)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATALYSTS; INFRARED RADIATION; MAGNETIC ANISOTROPY; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

HETEROBIMETALLIC CATALYSTS;

YTTERBIUM COMPOUNDS;

YTTERBIUM;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CATALYST; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; DISSOLUTION; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; GEOMETRY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MAGNETISM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SOLID STATE; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 0037687436     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0297640     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Sasai, H.; Suzuki, T.; Arai, S.; Arai, T.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4418-4420.
2. (a) Kobayashi, S. Lanthanides: Chemistry and Use in Organic Synthesis, Topics in Organometallic Chemistry; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1999.
3. (b) Shibasaki, M.; Yoshikawa, N. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2187-2209.
4. (c) Aspinall, H. C.; Dwyer, J. L. M.; Greeves, N.; Steiner, A. Organometallics 1999, 18, 1366-1368.
5. Sasai, H.; Suzuki, T.; Itoh, N.; Tanaka, K.; Date, T.; Okamura, K.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10372-10373.
6. (a) Aspinall, H. C.; Bickley, J. F.; Dwyer, J. L. M.; Greeves, N.; Kelly, R. V.; Steiner, A. Organometallics 2000, 19, 5416-5423.
7. (b) Aspinall, H. C. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1807-1850.
8. In ref 4, Aspinall et al. made a preliminary analysis which will be discussed in the following.
9. Quadrelii, E. A. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 167-169 and references therein.
10. The angle θ is defined as the average of 2-1-1′-2′ and 9-1-1′-9′ dihedrals.
11. 3] 3 taken from ref 4a.
12. Gröger, H.; Saida, Y.; Sasai, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Martens, J.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3089-3103.
13. 13C NMR spectra were assigned by a two-dimensional HETCOR experiment.
14. Bertini, I.; Luchinat, C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1996, 150.
15. The contact contribution is usually considered negligible, ref 11.
16. Di Bari, L.; Pintacuda, G.; Salvadori, P. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 75-82.
17. Considering the differences that exist between diamagnetic spectra reported in ref 4a, one concludes that the Lu-Na complex 4 is the diamagnetic complex more akin to 1.
18. C-H = 1.08 Å had no influence on the NMR data analysis through PERSEUS. One must take into account that the accuracy of paramagnetic NMR is limited by several factors (e.g., line width, bulk paramagnetism, neglect of contact terms).
19. 13C were less accurate and did not improve the quality of the fitting.
20. Di Bari, L.; Pintacuda, G.; Ripoli, S.; Salvadori, P. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2002, 40, 396-405.
21. Brittain, H. G.; Desreux, J. F. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 4459-4466.
22. -1.
23. Alsaadi, B. M.; Rossotti, F. J. C.; Williams, R. J. P. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1980, 2151-2154.
24. 1 of the diamagnetic complex 4.
25. 13C NMR spectra.
26. For the analysis of the pseudocontact shifts of 1 and 3, Aspinall and coworkers (ref 4a) used the respective XRD structures, which are indeed different from each other. These authors, however, fail to observe that the symmetric XRD structure of 3 fits equally well the NMR spectra of both derivatives. The accord is less satisfactory for the artificially symmetrized structure of 1, instead, where a nonvanishing intercept must be introduced to fit the data.
27. Di Bari, L.; Pintacuda, G.; Salvadori, P.; Dickins, R. S.; Parker, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9257-9264.
28. 8-THF solution of 2.
29. Richardson, F. S. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 2806-2812.
30. Di Bari, L.; Pintacuda, G.; Salvadori, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5557-5562.
31. Bleaney, B. J. Magn. Reson. 1972, 8, 91-100.
32. (a) Jaffé, H. H.; Orchin, M. Theory and Applications of Ultraviolet Spectroscopy; Wiley: New York, 1962.
33. (b) Rubio, M.; Merchán, M.; Ortí, E.; Roos, B. O. Chem. Phys. 1994, 179, 395-409.
34. (a) Harada, N.; Nakanishi, K. Circular Dichroic Spectroscopy - Exciton Coupling in Organic Stereochemistry; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1983.
35. (b) Berova, N.; Nakanishi, K. In Circular Dichroism: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed.; Berova, N., Nakanishi, K., Woody, R. W., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2000; Chapter 12.
36. Mason, S. F.; Seal, R. H.; Roberts, D. R. Tetrahedron 1974, 30, 1671-1682.
37. (a) Di Bari, L.; Pescitelli, G.; Salvadori, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7998-8004.
38. (b) Di Bari, L.; Pescitelli, G.; Marchetti, F.; Salvadori, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6395-6398.
39. (c) Di Bari, L.; Pescitelli, G.; Reginato, G.; Salvadori, P. Chirality 2001, 13, 548-555.
40. (a) Rosini, C.; Rosati, I.; Spada, G. P. Chirality 1995, 7, 353-358.
41. (b) Rosini, C.; Superchi, S.; Peerlings, H. W. I.; Meijer, E. W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 61-71.
42. (c) Proni, G.; Spada, G. P.; Lustenberger, P.; Welti, R.; Diederich, F. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5522-5527.
43. (a) DeVoe, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1964, 41, 393-400.
44. (b) DeVoe, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, 3199-3208.
45. Cech, C. L.; Hug, W.; Tinoco, I., Jr. Biopolymers 1976, 15, 131-152.
46. Rosini, C.; Zandomeneghi, M.; Salvadori, P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1993, 4, 545-554.
47. (a) Nishimoto, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1963, 67, 1443-1446.
48. (b) Forster, L. S.; Nishimroto, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 1459-1463.
49. b transition polarization and naphthalene long axis is found by CNDO calculations on 2-naphthoate (ref 38). See ref 32b for a discussion about the role played by transition polarizations on exciton-type calculations on 1,1′-binaphthyl derivatives.
50. CNDO/S-CI calculations were carried out with a CNDO/M program, according to Del Bene and Jaffé's formulation [Del Bene, J.; Jaffé, H. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1968, 49, 1221-1229], with a Mataga approximation of two-electron repulsion integrals. Up to 60 singly excited states, with maximum energy values of 7.0 eV, were included in the CI. B3LYP-DFT optimized structures (carried out with Gaussian 94, Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA) were used as the input geometries.
51. 3] is altered by the presence of a non-negligible amount of free BINOL, due to the partial decomposition of the complex [Peacock, R. D. and Siligardi, G., personal communications].
52. 3] is altered by the presence of a non-negligible amount of free BINOL, due to the partial decomposition of the complex [Peacock, R. D. and Siligardi, G., personal communications].
53. Cai, D.; Hughes, D. L.; Verhoeven, T. R.; Reider, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 7991-7994.
54. XSCANS, X-ray Single-Crystal Analysis System, rel. 2.1; Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc.: Madison, WI, 1996.
55. Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL-Plus, relat. 5.1; Bruker Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc.: Madison, WI, 1997.
56. Flack, H. D. Acta Crystallogr. 1983, A39, 876-881.