Instrumental and perceptual evaluations of two related singers

Journal of Voice

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 228-244

  Buder, Eugene H ^a   Wolf, Teresa ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Acoustic analysis; Aerodynamic analysis; Perception; Singers; Voice

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION; GLOTTIS; HEARING; LANGUAGE; LARYNGOGRAPHY; SINGING; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOCALIZATION;

EID: 0037642464     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(03)00040-7     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Sataloff RT, Spiegel JR. Care of the professional voice. Otolatyngol Clin N Am. 1991;24:1093-1124.
2. Lundy DS, Roy S, Casiano RR, Xue JW, Evans J. Acoustic analysis of the singing and speaking voice in singing students. J Voice. 2000;14:490-493.
3. Brown J, Rothman HB, Sapienza CM. Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices. J Voice. 2000;14:301-309.
4. Hogikyan ND, Appel S, Guinn LW, Haxer MJ. Vocal fold nodules in adult singers: regional opinions about etiologic factors, career impact, and treatment. A survey of otolaryngologists, speech pathologists, and teachers of singing. J Voice. 1999;13(1):128-142.
5. Lundy DS, Soham R, Casiano R, Xue JW, Evans J. Acoustic analysis of the singing and speaking voice in singing students. J Voice. 2000;14:490-493.
6. Yiu E, Worrall L, Longland J, Mitchell C. Analysing vocal quality of connected speech using Kay's computerized speech lab: a preliminary finding. Clin Linguist Phonet. 2000;14:295-305.
7. Campisi P, Tewfik TL, Pelland-Blais E, Husein M, Sadeghi N. Multi-dimensional voice program analysis in children with vocal cord nodules. J Otolaryngol. 2000;29:302-308.
8. Titze IR. Acoustic interpretation of the voice range profile. J Speech Hear Res. 1992;35:21-34.
9. Coleman RF. Sources of variation in phonetograms. J Voice. 1993;7:1-14.
10. Sundberg J. The science of the singing voice. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press; 1987.
11. Carroll LM, Sataloff RT, Heuer RJ, Joseph RS, Radionoff SL, Cohn JR. Respiratory and glottal efficiency measures in normal classically trained singers. J Voice. 1996;10:139-145.
12. Iwata S, von Leden H, Williams D. Air flow measurement during phonation. J Comm Dis. 1972;5:67-79.
13. Smitheran JR, Hixon TJ. A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production. J Speech Hear Dis. 1981;46:138-146.
14. Hirano M, Koike Y, von Leden H. Maximum phonation time and air usage during phonation. Folia Phoniatr. 1968;20:185-201.
15. Kreiman J, Gerratt B. Measuring vocal quality. In: Ball MJ, ed. Voice quality measurement. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 2000;37-48.
16. Kelman AW, Gordon MT, Simpson IC, et al. Assessment of vocal function by air-flow measurements. Folia Phoniatr. 1975;27:250-262.
17. Winholtz WS, Titze IR. Miniature head-mounted microphone for voice perturbation analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:894-899.
18. Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF. Clinical measurement of speech and voice. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 2000.
19. Brown WS, Hunt E, Williams W. Physiological difference between the trained and untrained speaking and singing voice. J Voice. 1988;2:102-108.
20. Rothman HB, Brown J, Sapienza CM, Morris RJ. Acoustic analyses of trained singers perceptually identified from speaking samples. J Voice. 2001;15:25-35.
21. Sataloff RT. The professional voice: Part III. Common diagnoses and treatments. J Voice. 1987;1:283-292.
22. Rubin HJ, Lecover M. Vocal intensity, subglottic pressure and airflow relationships insingers. Folia Phoniatr. 1967;19:393-413.
23. Griffin B, Woo P, Colton R, Casper J, Brewer D. Physiological characteristics of the supported singing voice. A preliminary study. J Voice. 1995;9:45-56.
24. Kent RD, Ball MJ, eds. Voice quality measurement. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 2000.
25. Parsa V, Jamieson DG. Acoustic discrimination of pathological voice: Sustained vowels versus continuous speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:327-339.