Early detection of colorectal tumors: CT or MRI?;Früherkennung von kolorektalen tumoren: CT oder MRT?

Radiologe

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 136-150

  Luboldt, W ^a   Hoepffner, N ^a   Holzer, K ^a   Jacobi, V ^a   Willenbrock, K ^a   Woeste, G ^a   Bechstein, W O ^a   Vogl, T J ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carcinoma; Colon; CT; MRI; Polyp; Rectum; Screening

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; BREAST; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COLON; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RECTUM; UTERINE CERVIX;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIVER; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASS SCREENING; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASMS, MULTIPLE PRIMARY; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; RADIATION DOSAGE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 0037610826     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-003-0862-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ayre-Smith G (1976) Hyoscine-N-butylbromide (Buscopan) as a duodenal relaxant in tubeless duodenography. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 17:701-713
2. Brenner H, Arndt V, Stürmer T, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Dhom G (2002) Präventionspotenzia endoskopischer Vorsorgeuntersuchungen für kolorektale Karzinome. Dtsch Arztebl 99: A 2186-2192 (http://www.multiorganscreening.org)
3. Bundesvereinigung K (2002) Früherkennung des Kolonkarzinoms: Ergänzung der bestehenden Maßnahmen um die qualitätsgesicherte, hohe Koloskopie. Dtsch Arztebl 99: B2256-2264 (http://www. multiorganscreening.org)
4. Cohnen M, Vogt C, Aurich V, Beck A, Haussinger D, Modder U (2002) Multi-slice CT-colonography in low-dose technique -preliminary results. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 174:835-838
5. Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM et al. (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:989-995
6. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC 3rd, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341:1496-1503
7. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ et al. (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704-711
8. Gelder RE van, Venema HW, Serlie IW et al. (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25-33
9. Gluecker T, Dorta G, Keller W, Jornod P, Meuli R, Schnyder P (2002) Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Gut 51:207-211
10. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I et al. (2002) Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography. Am J Surg 183(2):124-131
11. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtmann G, Debatin JF (2002) MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 223:248-254
12. Luboldt W, Morrin MM (2002) MR colonography: status and perspective. Abdom Imaging 27:400-409
13. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, Fried M, Krestin GP, Debatin JF (1997) Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 349:1288-1291
14. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Fried M, Debatin JF (2000) Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 216:383-388
15. Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ (2002) Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002. Eur Radiol 12:502-524 (http://www. multiorganscreening.org)
16. Luboldt W, Mann C, Tryon CL et al. (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast. Eur Radiol 12:2236-2241 (http://www. multiorganscreening.org)
17. Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X et al. (2002) Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 224:383-392
18. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217:765-771
19. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM et al. (2000) Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 119:300-304
20. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL et al. (2002) SEER (surveillance, epidemiology and end results) Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1999. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, http://seer. cancer.gov/csr/1973_1999/sections.html
21. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE, Libbe SD, Ilstrup DM, MacCarty RL (1987) Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 93:1009-1013
22. Toribara NW, Sleisenger MH (1995) Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 332:861-867
23. Weishaupt D, Patak MA, Froehlich J, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF (1999) Faecal tagging to avoid colonic cleansing before MRI colonography. Lancet 354:835-836
24. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Domagk D, Lugering N, Neumann E, Heindel W (2001) Colorectal polyps: detection with multi-slice CT colonography. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173:1069-1071
25. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L et al. (1997) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112:594-642
26. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685-692