Consensus and conflict in lay conceptions of citizenship: Why people reject or support maternity policies in Switzerland

Psychologica Belgica

Volumn 43, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 9-32

  Staerklé, Christian ^a   Roux, Patricia ^c   Delay, Christophe ^b   Gianettoni, Lavinia ^b   Perrin, Céline ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037600695     PISSN: 00332879     EISSN: 2054670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. (1996). Une citoyenneté à géométrie variable. Femmes, discours sur la famille et "nouvelle droite" en Grande-Bretagne. In A. Del Re & J. Heinen (Eds.), Quelle citoyenneté pour les femmes? La crise des Etats-providence et de la représentation politique en Europe (pp. 133-150). Paris: L'Harmattan.
2. Abrams, D., Marques, J.M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
3. Abrams, D., & Randsley de Moura, G. (2002). The psychology of collective political protest. In V. C. Ottati et al. (Eds), The social psychology of politics. Social psychological applications to social issues (Vol. 5, pp. 193-214). New York: Kluwer Publishers.
4. Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1992). Racialized boundaries: Race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. London: Routledge.
5. Appelbaum, L. (2001). The influence of perceived deservingness on policy decisions regarding aid to the poor. Political Psychology, 22, 419-442
6. Beauvois, J.L. (1994). Traité de la servitude libérale. Analyse de la soumission. Paris: Dunod.
7. Beck, U. (1986). Risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, C. (1994). Reflexive modernisation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9. Benhabib, S. (Ed.). (1996). Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Bock, G., & James, S. (Eds.). (1992). Beyond equality and difference. Citizenship, feminist politics and female subjectivity. London: Routledge.
11. Charles, N. (2000). Feminism, the state and social policy. London: Macmillan Press.
12. Clémence, A. (2001). Social positioning and social representations. In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social (pp. 83-95). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Clémence, A., Egloff, M., Gardiol, N., & Gobet, P. (1994). Solidarités sociales en Suisse. Lausanne: Réalités Sociales.
14. Crandall, C.S., & Beasley, R.K. (2001). A perceptual theory of legitimacy: Politics, prejudice, social institutions, and moral value. In J.T. Jost & B. Major, The psychology of legitimacy. Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice and intergroup relations (pp. 77-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Delphy, C. (1998). L'ennemi principal. In L'ennemi principal: Tome 1. Economie politique du patriarcat (pp. 31-56). Paris: Syllepse.
16. Delphy, C. (2001). Egalité, équivalence et équité. In L'ennemi principal: Tome 2. Penser le genre (pp. 261-291). Paris: Syllepse.
17. Doise, W. (2001). Droits de l'homme et force des idées. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
18. Doise, W., Clémence, A., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations. Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
19. Doise, W., & Staerklé, C. (2002). From political to social psychology: The societal approach. In K. R. Monroe (Ed.), Political psychology (pp. 151-171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Douglas, M. (1994). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. New York: Routledge.
21. Duckitt, J.H. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10, 63-84.
22. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.
24. Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la Prison. Paris: Gallimard.
25. Gelissen, J. (2000). Popular support for institutionalised solidarity: A comparison between European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 9, 285-300.
26. Gilbert, D.T., & Malone, P.S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
27. Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
28. Hobson, B. (Ed.). (2000). Gender and citizenship in transition. London: Macmillan Press.
29. Hogg, M.A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications. London: Routledge.
30. Honneth, A. (2000). La lutte pour la reconnaissance. Paris: Cerf.
31. Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., & Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2003). Citizenship, participation and identity construction: Political mobilization amongst British Muslims. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 00-00.
32. Isin, F.I, & Wood, P.K. (1999). Citizenship and identity. London: Sage.
33. Isin, F.I., & Turner, B.S. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of citizenship studies. London: Sage.
34. Joffe, H., & Staerklé, C. (2003). Self-control over body, mind, and destiny: Shared thinking and neglected contents in Western representations of outgroups. Unpublished manuscript.
35. Joffe, H. (1999). Risk and the other. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Jost, J.T., & Major, B. (Eds., 2001). The psychology of legitimacy. Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Kergoat, D. (2000). Division sexuelle du travail et rapports sociaux de sexe. In H. Hirata, F. Laborie, H. Le Doaré, & D. Senotier (Eds.), Dictionnaire critique du féminisme (pp. 35-44). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
38. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
39. Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship. Feminist perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
40. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 293-335). San Diego: Academic Press.
41. Marques, J., Abrams, D., & Serodio, R.G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436-447.
42. Marques, J., Pàez, D., & Abrams, D. (1998). Social identity and intragroup differentiation as subjective social control. In S. Worchel, J.F. Morales, D. Pàez, & J.-C. Deschamps. Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 124-141). London: Sage.
43. Marshall, T.H. (1992 [1950]). Citizenship and social class. London: Pluto.
44. Moscovici, S., & Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanations: From the "naive" to the "amateur" scientist. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory: Social and functional extensions (pp. 98-125). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
45. Okin, S. M. (1989). Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.
46. Okin, S. M. (1991). Gender, the public and the private. In D. Held (Ed.), Political theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
47. Opotow, S. (1996). Affirmative action, fairness, and the scope of justice. Journal of Social Issues (Special Issue: The affirmative action debate: What's fair in policy and programs?), 52, 19-24.
48. Orloff, A. S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58 (June), 303-328.
49. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. London: Routledge & Paul.
50. Pateman, C. (1983). Feminist critiques of the public/private dichotomy. In S. I. Benn & G. F. Gaus (Eds.), Public and private in social life (pp. 281-303). London: Croom Helm.
51. Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Standford: Standford University Press.
52. Phillips, A. (1991). Engendering democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
53. Ridgeway, C.L. (2001). The emergence of status beliefs: From structural inequality to legitimising ideology. In J.T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy. Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice and intergroup relations (pp. 257-277). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Roche, M. (2002). Social citizenship: Grounds of social change. In F.I. Isin & B.S. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of citizenship studies (pp. 69-86). London: Sage.
55. Ross, M., & Miller, D.T. (Eds.). (2002). The justice motive in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Roux, P. (2001). Perception of discrimination, feelings of injustice and women's resistance to gender equality. In F. Butera & G. Mugny (Eds.), Social influence in social reality. Promoting individual and social change (pp. 165-190). Berne: Hogrefe & Huber.
57. Roux, P., Perrin, V., Modak, M., & Voutat, B. (1999). Couple et égalité: un ménage impossible. Lausanne: Réalités Sociales.
58. Sanchez-Mazas, M., Van Humskerken, F., & Casini, A. (2003). Towards a social representional approach to citizenship: Political positioning in lay conceptions of the Belgian and of the European citizen. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 00-00.
59. Scott, J. (1998). La citoyenne paradoxale. Les féministes françaises et les droits de l'homme. Paris: Albin Michel.
60. Sears, D.O. (1998). Racism and politics in the United States. In J.L. Eberhardt & S. Fiske (Eds), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 76-100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61. Sears, D.O., & Funk, C. (1990). The limited effect of economic self-interest on political attitudes of the mass public. Journal of Behavioural Economics, 19, 247-271.
62. Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care. Feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. New York, London: Routledge.
63. Skitka, L.J., & Mullen, E. (2002). Psychological determinants of public opinion. In V. C. Ottati et al. (Eds), The social psychology of politics. Social psychological applications to social issues (Vol. 5, pp. 107-134). New York: Kluwer Publishers.
64. Skitka, L.J., & Tetlock, P. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205-1223.
65. Staerklé, C., Clémence, A., & Doise, W. (1998). Representation of human rights across different national contexts: The role of democratic and non-democratic populations and governments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 207-226.
66. Stuermer, S., & Kampmeier, C. (2003). Active citizenship: The role of community identification in community volunteerism. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 00-00.
67. Twine, F. (1994). Citizenship and social rights. London: Sage.
68. Van Orschoot, W. (2002). Popular support for social security. A sociological perspective. In J. Clasen (Ed.), What future for social security? Debates and reforms in national and cross-national perspective (pp. 33-52). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
69. Voet, R. (1998). Feminism and citizenship. London: Sage.
70. Wacquant, L. (1999). Les prisons de la misère. Éditions Raisons d'Agir.
71. Walby, S. (1997). Is citizenship gendered? In S. Walby (Ed.), Gender transformations (pp. 166-179). London: Routledge.
72. Walker, I., & Smith, H.J. (2002, Eds.). Relative deprivation. Specification, development and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Wright, S.C., & Tropp, L.R. (2002). Collective action in response to disadvantage: Intergroup perceptions, social identification, and social change. In I. Walker & H.J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation. Specification, development and integration (pp. 200-236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
75. Young, J. (1999). The exclusive society. London: Sage.
76. Zelditch, M. (2001). Theories of legitimacy. In J.T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy. Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice and intergroup relations (pp. 33-53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.