Implications of research in male-mediated developmental toxicity to clinical counsellors, regulators, and occupational safety officers

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 518, Issue , 2003, Pages 219-226

  Friedman, J M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; CARBON DISULFIDE; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; DIBROMOCHLOROPROPANE; ISOTRETINOIN; LEAD; METHYLMERCURY; THALIDOMIDE;

ANXIETY; AUTOSOMAL DOMINANT DISORDER; BIRTH DEFECT; CHILD; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; COUNSELING; DOWN SYNDROME; DRUG EXPOSURE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC DISORDER; GERM CELL; GONAD DOSE; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HOST SUSCEPTIBILITY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; IONIZING RADIATION; LEARNING; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NONHUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; OLIGOSPERMIA; PHYSICIAN; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SAFETY; TOXICITY;

EID: 0037593853     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9190-4_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Adler, I.-D., 1996, Future research directions to study genetic damage in germ cells and estimate genetic risk. Environ Health Perspect. 104(Suppl. 3):619-624.
2. Claudio, L., Bearer, C.F., and Wallinga, D., 1999a, Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms, Part I: The reproduction and fertility testing guidelines. Am J Indust Med. 35:543-553.
3. Claudio, L., Bearer, C.F., and Wallinga, D., 1999b, Assessment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms, Part II: The developmental toxicity testing guideline. Am J Indust Med. 35:554-563.
4. Dellarco, V.L., and Kimmel, C.A., 1997, Risk assessment of environmental agents for developmental toxicity: current and emerging approaches. Mutat Res. 396:205-218.
5. Friedler, G., 1996, Paternal exposures: Impact on reproductive and developmental outcome. An overview. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 55:691-700.
6. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), 1994. Guideline for Industry - Detection of Toxicity to Reproduction for Medicinal Products. (ICH-S5A).
7. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), 1996. Guideline for Industry - Detection of Toxicity to Reproduction for Medicinal Products: Addendum on Toxicity to Male Fertility. (ICH-S5B).
8. Lamb, J.C., IV, and Brown, S.M., 2000, Chemical testing strategies for predicting health hazards to children. Reprod Toxicol. 14:83-94.
9. Neel, J.V., and Lewis, S.E., 1990, The comparative radiation genetics of humans and mice. Ann Rev Genetics 24:327-362.
10. Olshan, A.F., 1995, Lessons learned from epidemiologic studies of environmental exposure and genetic disease. Environ Mol Mutagen. 23(Suppl. 26):74-80.
11. Pless, R., and Risher, J.F., 2000, Mercury, infant development, and vaccination. J Pediatr. 136:571-573.
12. Pryor, J.L., Hughes, C., Foster, W., Hales, B.F., and Robaire, B., 2000, Critical windows of exposure for children's health: The reproductive system in animals and humans. Environ Health Perspect. 108(Suppl 3):491-503.
13. Rice, G., Swartout, J., Mahaffey, K., and Schoeny, R., 2000, Derivation of U.S. EPA's oral Reference Dose (RfD) for methylmercury. Drug Chem Toxicol. 23:41-54.
14. Sankaranarayanan, K., 2001, Estimation of the hereditary risks of exposure to ionizing radiation: history, current status, and emerging perspectives. Health Phys. 80:363-369.
15. Schull, W.J., Otake, M., and Neel, J.V., 1981, Genetic effects of the atomic bombs: A reappraisal. Science. 213:1220-1227.
16. Shelby, M.D., 1994. Human germ cell mutagens. Envrion Mol Mutagen. 23 (Suppl. 24):30-34.
17. Trasler, J.M., and Doerksen, T.. Teratogen update: paternal exposures-reproductive risks. Teratology. 60:161-172.
18. Sullivan, F.M., 1998. Reproductive toxicity tests: retrospect and prospect. Hum Toxicol. 7:423-427.
19. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Research and Development, 1996. Guidelines for reproductive toxicity risk assessment. (EPA/630/R-96/009a).
20. U. S. Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition, Office of Premarket Approval, 2000, Redbook 2000: Toxicological Principles for the Safety of Food Ingredients, Section IV.C.9.a. Guidelines for Reproduction Studies.
21. rd edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 457-493.