Changing texts, changing thinking: Comprehension demands of new science textbooks

Reading Teacher

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 358-369

  Walpole, Sharon ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037585564     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bacon, B. (1981). The art of nonfiction. Children's Literature in Education, 12, 3-14.
2. Barman, C., DiSpezio, M., Guthrie, V., Leyden, M.B., Mercier, S., & Ostlund, K. (1992). Science (2nd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Beck, I.L., & Dole, J.A. (1992). Reading and thinking with history and science texts. In C. Collins & J.N. Mangieri (Eds.), Teaching thinking: An agenda for the twenty-first century (pp. 3 - 22). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., Hamilton, R.L., & Kucan, L. (1997). Questioning the Author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
5. Britton, B.K., Gulgoz, S., & Glynn, S. (1993). Impact of good and poor writing on learners: Research and theory. In B.K. Britton, A. Woodward, & M. Binkley (Eds.), Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice (pp. 1-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Britton, B.K., Schneider, M., Colomb, G., Sorrells, R., & Stimson, M. (1996). Improving instructional text: Tests of two revision models (Reading Research Report No. 58). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center.
7. Brummet, D.C., Lind, K.K., Barman, C.R., DiSpezio, M.A., & Ostlund, K.L. (1995). Destinations in science - Dance center. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Freedman, R. (1993). Bring 'em back alive. In M.O. Tunnell & R. Ammon (Eds.), The story of ourselves: Teaching history through children's literature (pp. 41 - 48). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
9. Hegerty, M., Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A. (1991). Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific texts. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research volume II (pp. 641 - 668). White Plains, NY: Longman.
10. Kintsch, E. (1990). Macroprocesses and microprocesses in the development of summarization skill. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 161 - 195.
11. Kintsch, W. (1994). The role of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 951 - 995). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12. Lauber, P. (1992). The evolution of a science writer. In E.B. Freeman & D.G. Person (Eds.), Using nonfiction tradebooks in the elementary classroom: From ants to zeppelins (pp. 11 - 16). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
13. Mayer, R.E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43, 31 - 43.
14. McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1 - 43.
15. Moline, S. (1995). I see what you mean: Children at work with visual information. York, MA: Stenhouse.
16. Peacock, A. (1997). Opportunities for science in the primary school. Staffordshire, England: Trentham.
17. Pearson, P.D. (1993). Teaching and learning reading: A research perspective. Language Arts, 70, 502 - 511.
18. Stinner, A. (1995). Science textbooks: Their present role and future form. In S.M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools (pp. 275 - 278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Walpole, S.C., & Dewitz, P. (1997, December). Assessing knowledge and strategies for informational text. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.