Brain-machine interfaces: Computational demands and clinical needs meet basic neuroscience

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 329-334

  Mussa Ivaldi, Ferdinando A ^a   Miller, Lee E ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; COCHLEA; COMPUTER; ELECTRODE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTOR CORTEX; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NEUROSCIENCE; PARALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOUND TRANSMISSION; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 0037533807     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00121-8     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Clynes, M.E. and Kline, N.S. (1960) Cyborgs and space, in Astronautics pp. 26-27, 74-75, American Rocket Society.
2. Von Neumann, J. The Computer and the Brain. 1958, Yale University Press.
3. Poggio T., Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature. 343:1990;263-266.
4. Schaal S. Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots? Trends Cogn. Sci. 3:1999;233-242.
5. Franz M.O., Mallot H.A. Biomimetic robot navigation. Rob Auton Syst. 30:2000;133-153.
6. Ritzmann R.E., et al. Insect walking and biorobotics: a relationship with mutual benefits. Biol. Science. 50:2000;23-33.
7. Riesenhuber M., Poggio T. Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12:2002;162-168.
8. Fromherz P., et al. A neuron-silicon junction: a retzius cell of the leech on an insulated-gate field effect transistor. Science. 252:1991;1290-1292.
9. Fusi S., et al. Spike-driven synaptic plasticity: theory, simulation, VLSI implementation. Neural Comput. 12:2000;2227-2258.
10. Zeck G., Fromherz P. Noninvasive neuroelectronic interfacing with synaptically connected snail neurons immobilized on a semiconductor chip. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;10457-10462.
11. Potter S. Distributed processing in cultured neuronal networks. Prog. Brain Res. 130:2001;49-62.
12. Loeb G.E. Cochlear prosthetics. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 13:1990;357-371.
13. Kubler A., et al. Brain-computer communication: unlocking the locked in. Psychol. Bull. 127:2001;358-375.
14. Niedermeyer E., Lopes Da Sylva F. Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. 1998;Williams and Wilkins.
15. Wolpaw J.R., et al. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin. Neurophysiol. 113:2002;767-791.
16. Wolpaw J.R., et al. An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 78:1991;252-259.
17. Wolpaw J.R., McFarland D.J. Multichannel EEG-based brain-computer communication. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 90:1994;444-449.
18. Wolpaw J.R., et al. Timing of EEG-based cursor control. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 14:1997;529-538.
19. Donchin E., et al. The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a p300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 8:2000;174-179.
20. Spencer K.M., et al. Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology. 38:2001;343-358.
21. Birbaumer N., et al. A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature. 389:1999;297-298.
22. Schalk G., et al. EEG-based communication: presence of an error potential. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111:2000;2138-2144.
23. Evarts E.V. Pyramidal tract activity associated with a conditioned hand movement in the monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 29:1966;1011-1027.
24. Humphrey D.R., et al. Predicting measures of motor performance from multiple cortical spike trains. Science. 170:1970;758-761.
25. Schwartz A.B., et al. Extraction algorithms for cortical control of arm prosthetics. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11:2001;701-707.
26. Chapin J.K., et al. Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2:1999;664-670.
27. Wessberg J., et al. Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates. Nature. 408:2000;361-365.
28. Taylor D.M., et al. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science. 296:2002;1829-1832.
29. Serruya M.D., et al. Instant neural control of a movement signal. Nature. 416:2002;141-142.
30. Meeker, D. et al. (2002) Rapid plasticity in the parietal reach region demonstrated with a brain-computer interface. In 2002 Abstract Viewer and Itinerary Planner, Program No. 357.7, Society for Neuroscience.
31. Kennedy P.R., Bakay R.A. Restoration of neural output from a paralyzed patient by a direct brain connection. NeuroReport. 9:1998;1707-1711.
32. Kennedy P.R., et al. Direct control of a computer from the human central nervous system. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 8:2000;198-202.
33. Kennedy P.R., King B. Dynamic interplay of neural signals during the emergence of cursor related cortex in a human implanted with the neurotrophic electrode. Chapin J.K., Moxon K.A. Neural Prostheses for Restoration of Sensory and Motor Function. 2001;221-233 CRC Press.
34. Gordon J., et al. Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial Errors. J. Neurophysiol. 73:1995;347-360.
35. Sainburg R.L., et al. Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. J. Neurophysiol. 70:1993;2136-2147.
36. Rauschecker J.P., Shannon R.V. Sending sound to the brain. Science. 295:2002;1025-1029.
37. Bak M., et al. Visual sensations produced by intracortical microstimulation of the human occipital cortex. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 28:1990;257-259.
38. Normann R.A., et al. A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis. Vision Res. 39:1999;2577-2587.
39. Zrenner E. Will retinal implants restore vision? Science. 295:2002;1022-1025.
40. Inmann A., et al. Signals from skin mechanoreceptors used in control of a hand grasp neuroprosthesis. NeuroReport. 12:2001;2817-2820.
41. Romo R., et al. Sensing without touching: psychophysical performance based on cortical microstimulation. Neuron. 26:2000;273-278.
42. Talwar S.K., et al. Rat navigation guided by remote control. Nature. 417:2002;37-38.
43. Sharp A.A., et al. Artificial electrical synapses in oscillatory networks. J. Neurophysiol. 67:1992;1691-1694.
44. Reger B.D., et al. Connecting brains to robots: an artificial body for studying the computational properties of neural tissue. Artif. Life. 6:2000;307-324.
45. Karniel, A. et al. Dynamic properties of the lamprey's neuronal circuits as it drives a two-wheeled robot, in Proceeding of the SAB'2002 Workshop on Motor Control in Humans and Robots. (in press).
46. Zelenin P.V., et al. Postural control in the lamprey: a study with a neuro-mechanical model. J. Neurophysiol. 84:2000;2880-2887.
47. Atkeson C. Learning arm kinematics and dynamics. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 12:1989;157-183.
48. Shadmehr R., Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14:1994;3208-3224.
49. Conditt M.A., et al. The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. J. Neurophysiol. 78:1997;554-560.
50. Kawato M., Wolpert D. Internal models for motor control. Novartis Found. Symp. 218:1998;291-304.
51. DiZio P., Lackner J. Congenitally blind individuals rapidly adapt to Coriolis force perturbations of their reaching movements. J. Neurophysiol. 84:2000;2175-2180.
52. Thoroughman K.A., Shadmehr R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature. 407:2000;742-747.
53. Bliss T.V.P., Lomo T. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 232:1973;331-356.
54. Ito M. Long-term depression. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 12:1989;85-102.
55. Bliss T.V.P., Collingridge G.L. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 361:1993;31-39.
56. Parker D., Grillner S. Neuronal mechanisms of synaptic and network plasticity in the lamprey spinal cord. Prog. Brain Res. 125:2000;381-398.
57. Mizuno T., et al. Differential induction of LTP and LTD is not determined solely by instantaneous calcium concentration: an essential involvement of a temporal factor. Eur. J. Neurosci. 14:2001;701-708.
58. Merzenich M.M., et al. Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 224:1984;591-605.
59. Donoghue J.P., Sanes J.N. Organization of adult motor cortex representation patterns following neonatal forelimb nerve injury in rats. J. Neurosci. 8:1988;3221-3232.
60. Nudo R.J., et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery following ischemic infarct. Science. 272:1996;1791-1794.
61. Sanes J.N., Donoghue J.P. Plasticity and primary motor cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23:2000;393-415.
62. Krebs H., et al. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 6:1998;75-87.
63. Reinkensmeyer D.J., et al. Assessment of active and passive restraint during guided reaching after chronic brain injury. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 27:1999;805-814.
64. Patton J.L., Mussa-Ivaldi F.A. Linear combinations of nonlinear models for predicting human-machine interface forces. Biol. Cybern. 86:2002;73-87.
65. Lum P.S., et al. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83:2002;952-959.
66. Nudo R.J., et al. Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve. 24:2001;1000-1019.
67. Plautz, E.J. et al. (2002) Induction of novel forelimb representations in peri-infarct motor cortex and motor performance produced by concurrent electrical and behavioral therapy. In 2002 Abstract Viewer and Itinerary Planner, Program No. 662.2, Society for Neuroscience.