Ciprofloxacin interaction with silicon-based and conventional hydrogel contact lenses

Eye and Contact Lens

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 83-89

  Karlgard, C C S ^a   Jones, L W ^a   Moresoli, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Antibiotics; Contact lens; Drug delivery; High Dk; Silicon based hydrogel

Indexed keywords

ALPHAPHILCON A; BALAFILCON A; BIOMATERIAL; CIPROFLOXACIN; ETAFILCON A; ION; LOTRAFILCON A; OMAFILCON A; POLYMACON; POLYMER; SILICON; SODIUM CHLORIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VIFILCON A; ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; SILASTIC;

ARTICLE; BANDAGE; CONTACT LENS; CORNEA THICKNESS; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG UPTAKE; EYE INJURY; EYE PROTECTION; HYDROGEL; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; PATHOGENESIS; PRECIPITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; ADSORPTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG INTERACTION; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; METABOLISM;

ADSORPTION; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS; CIPROFLOXACIN; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; DRUG INTERACTIONS; HYDROGEL; POLYHYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; SILICONE ELASTOMERS;

EID: 0037531383     PISSN: 15422321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ICL.0000061756.66151.1C     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Silbert JA. A review of therapeutic agents and contact lens wear. J Am Optom Assoc 1996;67:165-71.
2. Christie CL. Therapeutic contact lenses. Contact Lens and Ant Eye 1999;22:s20-s25.
3. Wichterle O, Lim D. Hydrophilic gels for biological use. Nature 1960;185:117-8.
4. Sedlacek J. Possibilities of application of eye drugs with the aid of gel-contact lenses. Cesk oftamal 1965;21:509-12.
5. Wheeler JC, Woods JA, Cox MJ, et al. Evolution of hydrogel polymers as contact lenses, surface coatings, dressings and drug delivery systems. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 1996;6:207-17.
6. Lesher GA, Gunderson GG. Continuous drug delivery through the use of disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:1012-8.
7. Hehl EM, Beck R, Luthard K, et al. Improved penetration of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones into the aqueous humour of patients by means of Acuvue contact lenses. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999;55:317-23.
8. Bawa R. Ocular inserts. In: Mitra AK, ed. Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Systems. New York, Marcel Decker Inc. 1993 pp 223-60.
9. Montero J, Iruzubiet J, Nebot Ripoll JR, et al. Practical experience with a high Dk lotrafilcon A fluorosilicone hydrogel extended wear contact lens in Spain. CLAO J 2001;27:41-6.
10. Lim L, Tan DTH, Chan WK. Therapeutic use of Bausch & Lomb PureVision contact lenses. CLAO J 2002;27:179-85.
11. Alvord L, Court J, Davis T et al. Oxygen permeability of a new type of high Dk soft contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:30-6.
12. Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials - how they work? In: Sweeney DF (ed): Silicone hydrogels - the rebirth of continuous wear contact lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann 2000 pp 1-21.
13. Barza M. Treatment of eye infections. In: Hooper DC, Wolfson JS (eds): Quinolone antimicrobial agents. Washington, Am Soc Microbiol 1993 pp 423-34.
14. Kalayci D, Basci N, Kortunay S, et al. Penetrations of topical ciprofloxacin by presoaked medicated soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1999;25:182-4.
15. Praus R, Krejci L. Elution and intraocular penetration of the ophthalmic drugs of different molecular weight from the hydrophilic contact lenses through the intact and injured cornea. Acta Univ Carol [Med] 1977;23:3-10.
16. Lemp MA. Bandage lenses and the use of topical solutions containing preservatives. Ann Ophthalmol 1978: October: 1321.
17. Iwasaki W, Kosaka Y, Momose T, et al. Absorption of topical disodium cromoglycate and its preservatives by soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1988;14:155-8.
18. Garrett Q, Chatelier RC, Griesser HJ, et al. Effect of charged groups on the adsorption and penetration of proteins onto and into carboxymethylated poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 1998;19:2175-86.
19. Hull DS, Edelhauser HF, Hyndiuk RA. Ocular penetration of prednisolone and the hydrophilic contact lens. ARCH ophthalmol 1974;92:413-6.
20. Podos SM, Becker B, Asseff C, et al. Pilocarpine therapy with soft contact lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1972;73:336-41.
21. Riley CM, Kindberg CG, Stella VJ. The physicochemical properties of quinolone antimicrobials variously substituted at C-7. In: Fernandes PB (ed): Quinolones. Prous Sci Publ, S. A. 1998 pp 21-36.
22. Firestone BA, Dickason MA, Tran T. Solubility characteristics of three fluoroquinolone ophthalmic solutions in an in vitro tear model. Int J Pharm 1998;164:119-28.
23. Ruben M, Watkins R. Pilocarpine dispensation for the soft hydrophilic contact lens. Br J Ophthalmol 1975;59:455-8.
24. Matoba AY, McCulley JP. The effect of therapeutic soft contact lenses on antibiotic delivery to the cornea. Ophthalmology 1985;92:97-9.
25. Momose T, Ito N, Kanai A, et al. Adsorption of levocabastine eye drops by soft contact lenses and its effects in rabbit eyes. CLAO J 1997;23:96-9.
26. Baker D, Tighe B. Polymers in contact lens applications (VIII) the problem of biocompatibility. CLAO J 1981;10:3-14.
27. Akerman S, Viinikka P, Svarfvar B et al. Transport of drugs across porous ion exchange membranes. J Control Release 1998;50:153-66.
28. Lopez-Alemany A, Compan V, et al. Porous structure of Purevision versus Focus night & day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mat Res 2002;63:319-25.
29. Nicolson PC, Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Biomaterials 2001;22:3273-83.
30. Plaut BS, Meakin BJ, Davies DJG. The influence of various counter ions on the interaction of chlorhexidine with hydrophilic contact lens polymer, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate). J Pharm Pharmacol 1980;32:453-9.
31. Lai Y-C. Novel polyurethane-silicone hydrogels. J Appl Polym Sci 1995;56:301-10.
32. Bhatia S, Goldberg EP, Enns JB. Examination of contact lens surfaces by atomic force microscope (AFM). CLAO J 1997;23:264-9.
33. Dean R. Ciprofloxacin drug absorption interactions. The University of Chicago Medical Centre Bulletin: Topics in Drug Therapy 1997; 39: 1-20.