Comparison of high-resolution contrast-enhanced 3D MRA with digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of hepatic arterial anatomy

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 463-468

  Matoba, Munetaka ^a   Tonami, H ^a   Kuginuki, M ^a   Yokota, H ^a   Takashima, S ^a   Yamamoto, I ^a  

^a KANAZAWA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Liver; Magnetic resonance angiography; Vascular study

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GASTRODUODENAL ARTERY; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPLEEN ARTERY; SUPERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0037526511     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9260(03)00085-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chang AE, Schneider PO, Sugarbaker PH, et al. A prospective randomized trial of regional versus systemic continuous 5-fluorodeoxy-uridine chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg, 1987;206:685-690.
2. Kajanti M, Pyrhonen S, Mantyla M, Rissanen P. Intra-arterial and intravenous use of 4′-epidoxorubicine combinated with 5-fluorouracil in primary hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized comparison. Am J Clin Oncol, 1992;15:37-40.
3. Takats PG, Kerr DJ, Poole CJ, et al. Hepatic arterial chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer, 1994;69:372-378.
4. Matsuda T, Yamagishi H, Jin MB, et al. Laparotomy versus interventional radiological procedures for the implantation of arterial infusion devices. Surg Today, 1997;27:398-402.
5. Jung HY, Shim HJ, Kwak BK, et al. Percutaneously implantable catheter-port system for chemotherapeutic infusion through the hepatic artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1999;172:641-644.
6. Arai Y. Interventional radiology for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Jpn J Cancer Chemother, 1996;23:1385-1389.
7. Bloom AI, Gordon RL, Ahl KH, et al. Transcatheter embolization for the treatment of misperfusion after hepatic artery chemoinfusion pump implantation. Ann Surg Oncol, 1999;6:350-358.
8. Davis CP, Hany TF, Wildermuth S, et al. Postprocessing techniques for gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. RadioGraphics, 1997;17:1061-1077.
9. Shetty AN, Shirkhoda A, Bis KG, Alcantara A. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in a single breath-hold: a novel technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1995;165:1290-1292.
10. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, et al. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology, 1995;197:785-792.
11. Leung DA, Mckinnon GC, Davis CP, et al. Breath-hold,contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology, 1996;200: 569-571.
12. Holland GA, Dougherty L, Carpenter JP, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1996;166:971-981.
13. Meaney JF, Prince MR, Nostrant TT, Stanley JC. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of visceral arteries in patients with suspected chronic mesenteric ischemia. JMRI, 1997;7:171-176.
14. Shirkhoda A, Konez O, Shetty AN, et al. Mesenteric circulation: three-dimensional MR angiography with a gadolinium-enhanced multiecho gradient-echo technique. Radiology, 1997;202:257-261.
15. Ernst O, Asnar V, Sergent G, et al. Comparing contrast-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography and conventional angiography in the evaluation of mesenteric circulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000;174: 433-439.
16. Zeh H, Choyke PL, Alexander HR, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA prior to isolated hepatic perfusion for metastases. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1999;23:664-669.
17. Kopka L, Rodenwaldt J, Vosshenrich R, et al. Hepatic blood supply: comparison of optimized dual phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology, 1999;211:51-58.
18. Uflacker R. Atlas of vascular anatomy: an angiographic approach. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1997.
19. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 1977;33:159-174.
20. Hilfiker PR, Herfkens RJ, Heiss SG, et al. Partial fat-saturated contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography compared with non-fat-saturated and conventional fat-saturated MR angiography. Radiology, 2000;216:298-303.
21. Chambers TP, Fishman EK, Bluemke DA. et al. Identification of the aberrant hepatic artery with axial spiral CT. JVIR, 1995;6:959-964.
22. Winter TC, III, Nghiem HV, Freeny PC, et al. Hepatic arterial anatomy: demonstration of normal supply and vascular variants with three-dimensional CT angiography. RadioGraphics, 1995;15:771-780.
23. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Schmidt AJ, et al. Computed tomographic angiography: historical perspective and new state-of-art using multi detector-row helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1999;23:83-90.