Implementation of concurrent engineering: A survey in Italy and Belgium

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 225-238

  Portioli Staudacher, A ^a   Van Landeghem, H ^b   Mappelli, M ^a   Redaelli, C E ^c  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Concurrent engineering; International survey

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SURVEYS;

SEQUENTIAL ENGINEERING;

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING;

EID: 0037501738     PISSN: 07365845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-5845(03)00029-2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Clark K.B., Wheelwright S.C. Managing the new product and process development. 1992;The Free Press, New York.
2. Stalk G. Time - The Next Source of Competitive Advantage. Harward Business Review, July August, 1988.
3. Stalk G., Hout T. Competing against time. 1990;The Free Press, New York.
4. Turino J. Making it work calls for input from everyone. Concurrent engineering: Special report. IEEE Spectrum 28 (July), 1991. p. 22-37.
5. Portioli A., Singh N. A framework for integration of production management issues and concurrent engineering. Int J Systems Sci. 28(9):1997;877-888.
6. Portioli A, Sianesi A. Moving the Complexity Management from the PP&C System to the Product Design System: a comparison between planning bills and VRP approaches. In: de Weerd-Nederhof PC, Kerssens-van Drogelen IC, Enschede RV, editors. Managing the R&D Process.
7. Syan C.S., Mennon U. Concurrent engineering. Concepts, implementation and practice. 1994;Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
8. Brandolese AM, Brun A, Portioli Staudacher A. Introduzione alla Gestione della Qualità, CUSL. Milano, 1999 [in Italian].
9. Shina S.G. Successful implementation of concurrent engineering products and processes. 1993;Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA.
10. Hof R. The People's Company.Business Week, December 3, 2001. EB 11-7.
11. Driva H., Pawar K. The development of a generic framework for the implementation of concurrent engineering. Int J Comput Appl Technol. 9(4):1996;165-173.
12. De Wilde H, A, Gap analysis knowledge-base for minimizing the time to market, Master's Thesis, University of Ghent, Ghent, 1993.
13. Van Landeghem R, Upite I, Thomson V, Portioli A. Concurrent engineering benchmarking: an international survey, Proceedings of the European Concurrent Engineering Conference (ECEC '99). Leicester 1999. p. 265-9.
14. Van Landeghem R, Roels T. Statistical analysis of Concurrent Engineering success factors and results. Proceedings of ECEC'01, Valencia 2001. p. 206-10.
15. Abdalla H, Knight J. A benchmarking strategy for global concurrent engineering, Conference Proceedings of CEE '97, Erlangen, 1997.
16. Pallot PM. Suitability of available IT, & tools for CE: A European assessment, Proceedings of CEE'96, Cambridge, 1996.
17. Van Landeghem R. Experiences with a concurrent engineering self-assessment tool. Int J Prod Econ. 64:2000;295-309.
18. Whildschut E, Wiggers E. Time based competition. Deventer: Kluwer, 1993 [in Dutch].
19. Maylor H. Concurrent new product development. an empirical assessment Int J Oper Prod Manag. 17(12):1997;1196-1214.