Quantum logic between atoms inside a high-Q optical cavity

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  You, L ^a   Yi, X X ^a   Su, X H ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; ELECTRODYNAMICS; HAMILTONIANS; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; PHOTONS; QUANTUM THEORY; RESONANCE;

OPTICAL CAVITY; QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS; QUANTUM LOGIC; SINGLE MODE CAVITY;

QUANTUM OPTICS;

EID: 0037500046     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Fortschr. Phys. 48 (9) (2000), special issue on experimental proposals for quantum computation.
2. J.I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H.J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221 (1997).
3. T. Pellizzari, S. Gardiner, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3788 (1995). κ = 0.4g in the caption of Fig. 3 of this reference seems to be in error. Only with κ = 0.04g can we find success rates close to values as shown in the figure.
4. G.R. Guthohrlein, M. Keller, K. Hayasaka, W. Lange, and H. Walther, Nature (London) 414, 49 (2001).
5. A.B. Mundt, A. Kreuter, C. Becher, D. Leibfried, J. Eschner, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and R. Blatt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 103001 (2002).
6. C.J. Hood et al., Science 287, 1447 (2000)
7. A.C. Doherty, T.W. Lynn, C.J. Hood, and H.J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. A 63, 013401 (2001).
8. P.W.H. Pinkse et al., Nature (London) 404, 365 (2000)
9. M. Hennrich, T. Legero, A. Kuhn, and G. Rempe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4872 (2000).
10. P. Bertet, S. Osnaghi, P. Milman, A. Auffeves, P. Maioli, M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 143601 (2002)
11. M. Brune, E. Hagley, J. Dreyer, X. Maitre, A. Maali, C. Wunderlich, J.M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, ibid. 77, 4887 (1996).
12. M. S. Chapman (private communication).
13. J.I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995).
14. K. Molmer and A. Sorensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1835 (1999)
15. A. Sorensen and K. Molmer, Phys. Rev. A 62, 022311 (2000).
16. C.A. Sackett, D. Kielpinski, B.E. King, C. Langer, V. Meyer, C.J. Myatt, M. Rowe, Q.A. Turchette, W.M. Itano, D.J. Wineland, and C. Monroe, Nature (London) 404, 256 (2000).
17. J. Pachos and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 187903 (2002).
18. S.J. Van Enk, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5178 (1997).
19. C = 0). The conditional phase shift [Eq. (4)] can be achieved by repeated operation on the single atom of a Raman π pulse in the order (atom A) → (atom B) → (atom B) → (atom A), [rather than (atom A) → (atom B) → (atom A) → (atom B) as suggested in Ref. [4]]. Our four-photon protocol in a sense unites the four separate pulses into one with the use of large off-resonant detunings for all single-atom processes. In doing so, we end up with a protocol without the requirement for individual atom addressing.
20. L. You, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012302 (2001).
21. H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993).
22. S. Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 346 (1995)
23. A. Barenco, C.H. Bennett, R. Cleve, D.P. DiVincenzo, N. Margolus, P. Shor, T. Sleator, J.A. Smolin, and H. Weinfurter, Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457 (1995).
24. M.S. Shahriar, J.A. Bowers, B. Demsky, P.S. Bhatia, S. Lloyd, P.R. Hemmer, and A.E. Craig, Opt. Commun. 195, 411 (2001).
25. S.B. Zheng and G.C. Guo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2392 (2000)
26. S. Osnaghi, P. Bertet, A. Auffeves, P. Maioli, M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, ibid. 37, 037902 (2001).
27. A. Beige, D. Braun, B. Tregenna, and P. Knight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1762 (2000)
28. A. Beige, D. Braun, and P.L. Knight, New J. Phys. 2, 22 (2000).
29. H. L. Wang (private communication).