Public health, GIS, and the internet

Annual Review of Public Health

Volumn 24, Issue , 2003, Pages 57-82

  Croner, Charles M ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS   (United States)

Author keywords

Department of Health and Human Services; Geospatial; Metadata; National Spatial Data Infrastructure

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY CARE; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DISEASE CONTROL; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; GEOGRAPHY; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK MANAGEMENT; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; INTERNET; PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION; PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATICS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES;

EID: 0037490134     PISSN: 01637525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.012902.140835     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (112)

1. BLM. 2002. ArcGIS Implementation Plan: Executive Summary, Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/Washington. http://www.blm.gov/nhp/efoia/or/FY2002/IB/ib-or-2002-086Att1.htm
2. Deleted in proof
3. Broome FR, Meixler DB. 1990. The TIGER Data Base Structure. J. Am. Congr. Surv. Mapp. 17(1):39-47
4. Bowen W. 2000. American Cities Atlas Project. http://geography.iningco.com/library/maps/blusdc.htm
5. Cahan B. 2000. Financing the NSDI: Aligning Federal and Non-Federal Investments. http://www.fgdc.gov/publications/reports.html
6. Cahan B, Ball M. 2002. GIS at Ground Zero: Spatial Technology Bolsters World Trade Center Response and Recovery. http://www.geoplace.com/gw/2002/0201/0201wtc.asp
7. California GIS Council. 2001. Regional GIS Members. http://www.gis.ca.gov/council/index.epl
8. California Office of the Attorney General. 2002. Registered Sex Offenders (Megan's Law). http://caag.state.ca.us/megan/index.htm
9. Carnevale S, Parrott B, Tayman J. 2001. Data Development Partnerships in the San Diego Region. http://www.gis.com/trends/sandag.html
10. Cent. Dis. Control Prev. 2002. Injury Maps. http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/maps/default.htm
11. Cent. Dis. Control Prev. 2001. NCHS Research Data Center. Hyattsville, MD: Natl. Cent. Health Stat. 8 pp.
12. Cent. Dis. Control Prev. 2002. Women and Heart Disease: An Atlas of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mortality. 2nd ed. http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/cvd/womensatlas/atlas.htm
13. Chiappa N. 2001. The COOK Report on Internet. http://wireless.oldcolo.com/biology/progress2000/cookjul.txt
14. Clarke KJC, McLafferty SL, Tempalski BJ. 1996. On epidemiology and geographic information systems: a review and discussion of future directions. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2(2):85-92
15. Cox LH. 2002. Bounds on entries in 3-dimensional contingency tables subject to given marginal totals. In Inference Control in Statistical Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2316, ed. J Domingo-Ferrer, pp. 21-33. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
16. Cox LH. 1996. Protecting confidentiality in small population health and environmental statistics. Stat. Med. 15:1895-905
17. Cromley EK, McLafferty SL. 2002. GIS and Public Health. New York: Guilford Press
18. Croner CM. 2002. Building an environmental health tracking network: focus on chronic diseases. In Public Health GIS News and Information, ed. CM Croner. 3(45):21-24. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/gis.htm
19. Croner CM. 2002. Geographic Information Science: Exciting Spatial Tools for Detecting Inequalities in Public Health. Presented at DHHS Natl. Leadersh. Summit Elimin. Racial Ethn. Dispar. Health, Washington, DC
20. Deleted in proof
21. Croner CM. 2001. Integrating geographical information with statistical programs: challenges and opportunities. Stat. Policy Work. Pap. 32:244-51. Off. Manag. Budget, Fed. Comm. Stat. Methodol.
22. Croner CM. 2000. The national spatial data infrastructure: new developments in crisis management and response. See Ref. 18, 11(37):22-24
23. Croner CM. 1999. The Washington Geographic Information System Consortium. See Ref. 18, 11(31):17-20
24. Croner CM, Broome FR. 2002. New Geospatial Management Initiatives for DHHS. Presented at Special Joint HHS CIO Counc. HHS Data Counc. Meet., Washington, D.C.
25. Croner CM, Sperling J, Broome FR. 1996. Geographic information systems (GIS): new perspectives in understanding human health and environmental relationships. Stat. Med. 15:1961-77
26. Croner CM, Stroup DF. 1999. GIS and EIS: geographic information systems and the Epidemic Intelligence Service. EIS Bull. Fall/Winter 10-13
27. Davenhall WF. 2002. Protecting Geocoded Health Data. http://www.esri.com/industries/health/hipaa.html
28. Dep. Health Hum. Serv. 2002. HHS Data Council: Gateway to Data and Statistics. http://aspe.hhs.gov
29. Dep. Health Hum. Serv. 2002. National Standards to Protect the Privacy of Personal Health Information. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa
30. Dizard WP. 2002. GIS Files Elude Efforts to Meet 508 Standards. http://www.gcn.com/21_28/news/19989-1.html
31. Doyle P, Lane JI, Theeuwes JJM, Zayatz LV, eds. 2001. Confidentiality, Disclosure, and Data Access: Theory and practical Applications for Statistical Agencies. Amsterdam: Elsevier
32. Fed. Commun. Comm. 2002. Enhanced 911. http://www.fcc.gov/911/enhanced
33. Fed. Geogr. Data Comm. 1998. Geospatial Metadata Standards. http://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/meta_stand.html
34. Fed. Geogr. Data Comm. 2001. Geospatial One-Stop Office of Management and Budget Capital Asset Plan (Exhibit 300). http://www.fgdc.gov/geo-one-stop
35. Fed. Geogr. Data Comm. 2002. Geospatial Information One-Stop To Spatially Enable Delivery of Government Services. http://www.fgdc.gov/geo-one-stop/docs/factsheet.doc
36. Fed. Geogr. Data Comm. 2002. Geospatial One-Stop: Best Practices White Paper. http://www.fgdc.gov/geo-one-stop/docs
37. Fed. Geogr. Data Comm. 2002. Homeland Security and Geographic Information Systems. http://www.fgdc.gov/publications/homeland.html
38. FedStats. 2002. MapStats. http://www.fedstats.gov/mapstats/whatsnew.html
39. FirstGov. 2002. Official Government Gateways. http://www.firstgov.gov
40. Flynn P. 2002. The XML FAQ. http://www.ucc.ie/xml/#import
41. Food Drug Admin. 2001. Telemedicine Related Activities. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/telemed.html
42. Foreman MA. 2002. Statement before the Committee on Government Reform. US HR Subcomm. Technol. Procure. Policy. Work. Pap.
43. Foresman TA. 1999. Spatial analysis and mapping on the Internet. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 5(4):57-64
44. Fresno Police Dep. 2002. Megan's Law Map Site. http://www.ci.fresno.ca.us/fpd/meganlaw/index.html
45. Geoplace. 2002. Nation's Capital Puts Powerful GIS Tool in Employees' Hands. http://www.geoplace.com
46. Geoworld. 2002. Interview with Jack Dangermond, President and Founder, ESRI. http://www.geoplace.com/gr/interview/dangermond.asp
47. Green K. 2001. TOPOFF, Preparing for the Worst. http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/mscmc/TOPOFF.htm
48. Grossman RL. 2001. DataSpace Fact Sheet. http://www.dataspaceweb.net
49. Grubesic TH, Murray AT. 2002. Constructing the divide: spatial disparities in broadband access. Pap. Regul. Sci. 81(2):197-221
50. HHS Data Counc. Introd. 1997. Confidentiality of Individually-Identifiable Health Information: Recommendations of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. http://aspe.hhs.gov/datacncl/intro.htm#dcagenda
51. HUD. 2002. Enterprise Geographic Information System (EGIS). http://hud.esri.com/egis
52. Hughes D. 2002. Challenges of extending scalable wireless to remote sensor locations. Meet. Multi-Sector Crisis Management Consortium (MSCMC), Jan. 16
53. Jacquez GM, Greiling D. 2002. The Geographic Distribution of Breast, Lung and Colorectal Cancer in Long Island, New York. http://www.terraseer.com/casestudies/longisland/default.html
54. Karr A, Lee J, Sanil P. 2002. Web-based systems that disseminate information from data but protect confidentiality. Advances in Digital Government, ed. AK Elmagarmid, WM McIver. Amsterdam: Kluwer
55. Krieger N, Waterman P, Chen JT, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV, Carson R. 2002. Zip code caveat: bias due to spatiotemporal mismatches between zip codes and US Census-defined geographic areas: the public health disparities geocoding project. Am. J. Public Health 92(7):1100-2
56. Lake A. 2002. Will GML enable an accessible Geo-Web? GeoWorld 15(7):42-44
57. Deleted in proof
58. nd ed.
59. Lowe JW. 2002. Homeland homework: reconfiguring for wider spatial integration. Geosp. Solut. 12:42-45
60. MacDorman MF, Gay GA. 1999. State initiatives in geocoding vital statistics data. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 5(2):91-93
61. Mapping Science Committee. 1995. A Data Foundation for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
62. Mapping Science Committee. 1997. The Future of Spatial Data and Society. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
63. Meador M, Ruggles AJ. 2000. Steps involved in randomizing the coordinates of address-matched locations. See Ref. 18, 7(35):11-14
64. Melnick AL. 2002. Introduction to Geographic Information Systems in Public Health. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publ.
65. Maryland. Dep. Planning. 2002. Hot Spot Communities & Spot Light Schools. http://www.mdp.state.md.us/GIS/mdmaps.htm
66. Multi-Sector Crisis Manag. Res. Cent. 2002. MSCMC. http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/mscmc/mscmrc.html
67. Natl. Assoc. County City Health Off. 2002. Geographic Information Systems. http://www.naccho.org/
68. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1999. Cancer Mortality Maps & Graph Web Site. http://www3.cancer.gov/atlasplus/
69. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2002. Geographical Information System for Health (GIS-H). http://www.healthgis-li.com/researchers/researchers.htm
70. Natl. Cent. Health Stat. 1996. Atlas of United States Mortality. Hyattsville, MD
71. Natl. Cent. Health Stat. 2002. Healthy People 2010. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hphome.htm
72. Natl. Inst. Justice. 2002. Mapping and Analysis for Public Safety. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/maps/welcome.html
73. Natl. Inst. Health. 2002. Cancer Mortality Maps & Graph Web Site. http://www3.cancer.gov/atlasplus/index.html
74. New York City Off. Emerg. Manag. OEM. 2002. OEM Mission Statement. http://www.nyc.gov/html/oem/html/about.html
75. New York State GIS Clearinghouse. 2002. Results from the 2002 NYSGIS Survey. http://www.nysgis.state.ny.us/index.html
76. New York State. 2002. Cancer Surveillance Improvement Initiative. http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/cancer/csii/nyscsii.htm
77. Niemann B. 2002. Building Peer-to-Peer XML Content Networks of Web Services for Federal Scientific and Statistical Data and Information: FedStats.Net and Beyond. http://www.gsa.gov/attachments/GSA_PUBLICATIONS/extpub/11-BLNiemann-EPA_7.htm
78. Deleted in proof
79. Deleted in proof
80. Off. Civil Rights. 2002. Medical privacy - national standards to protect the privacy of personal health information: final modifications to the privacy rule. Fed. Regist. Aug. 14. http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/finalreg.html
81. OGETA, Inc. 2002. About OGETA Consortium. http://www.ogeta.com/consortium/about.html
82. OpenGIS Consortium. 2001. Geography Markup Language (GML) 2.0. http://opengis.net/gml/01-029/GML2.html
83. OpenGIS Consortium. 2002. Multi-Hazard Mapping Initiative (MMI) http://ip.opengis.org/mmi
84. Deleted in proof
85. Peckenpaugh J. 2001. Mapping Agency Blocks Access, Postpones Outsourcing Pact. http://www.govexec.com/news
86. Potomac Tech J. 2002. D.C. Mapping Ahead of Pack. http://www.potomactechjournal.com/displayarticledetail.asp?art_id=57707
87. Public Health Dev. Fund. 2002. Multi-Agency Internet Geographic Information Service. http://maigis.wmpho.org.uk/
88. Reichardt ME. 2002. OGC Seeks Interested Parties for Geospatial One-Stop. http://www.opengis.org/ogcInterop.htm
89. Reichardt ME. 2001. Press Announcement. http://www.opengis.org/ogcInterop.htm
90. Reichardt ME. 2002. XML's Role in the Geospatial Information Revolution. http://www.gsa.gov/attachments/GSA_PUBLICATIONS/extpub/11-MReichardt-OGC_3.htm
91. Richards TB, Croner CM, Rushton G, Brown CK, Fowler L. 1999. Geographic information systems and public health: mapping the future. Public Health Rep. 114(4):359-73
92. Richards TB, Henriques WD, Croner CM, Brown CK, Saccenti JC, Berry P. 1999. Toward a GIS sampling frame for surveys of local Health Departments and local Boards of Health. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 5(4):65-74
93. Rushton G, Lolonis P. 1996. Exploratory spatial analysis of birth defect rates in an urban population. Stat. Med. 15:717-26
94. San Diego Assoc. Gov. 2000. Regional Information System Overview. http://www.sandag.org/uploads/publicationid/publicationid_216_559.pdf
95. Soley MS, OMG Staff Strategy Group. 2000. Model Driven Architecture. http://www.omg.org/mda/presentations.htm
96. Steel P, Sperling J. 2001. The impact of multiple geographies and geographic detail on disclosure risk: interactions between Census tract and ZIP code tabulation geography. Proc. Surv. Res. Methods Sect., Am. Stat. Assoc.
97. Theseira M. 2002. Using Internet GIS technology for sharing health and health related data for the West Midlands Region. Health Place 8(1):37-46. http://maigis.wmpho.org.uk
98. Thrall GI. 1999. The future of GIS in public health management and practice. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 5(4):75-82
99. Thrall SE. 1999. Geographic information system (GIS) hardware and software. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 5(2):82-90
100. Univ. Illin. Chicago. 2002. National Center for Data Mining. http://www.ncdm.uic.edu
101. US Environ. Prot. Agency. 2002. Enviromapper. http://epa.gov/superfund/sites/locate/index.htm
102. US Geol. Surv. 2001. Cancer Mortality in the United States: 1970-1994: Map Layer Description File. http://www.nationalatlas.gov/cancerm.html
103. US Geol. Surv. 2002. National Atlas of the United States. http://www.nationalatlas.gov; http://www.nationalatlas.gov/virusmap.html; http://www.nationalatlas.gov/virusprint.html
104. US Geol. Surv. 2002. NWISWeb Data for the Nation. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/
105. Wallace M, Sperling J. 2000. Integrated Statistical Solutions, URISA Jn. 12(4) http://www.urisa.org/Journal/protect/Vol12%20No4/sperling/ Pages%20from%20coverfinal.pdf
106. Warnecke L, Beattie J, Kollin C, Lyday W. 1998. Geographic information technology in cities and counties: a nationwide assessment. Washington, DC: Am. Forests
107. Wartell J, McEwen JT. 2000. Sharing Crime Maps and Spatial Data: Meeting the Challenges. Natl. Inst. Justice. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij
108. Washington Geogr. Inf. Consort 2002. Washington GIS Consortium. http://www.wgis.org
109. Washington State Dep. Health. 2002. EpiQMS. http://www5.doh.wa.gov/EpiQMS
110. Xue Y, Cracknell AP, Guo HD. 2002. Telegeoprocessing: the integration of remote sensing, Geographic Information System (GIS), Global Positioning System (GPS) and telecommunication. Int. J. Remote Sens. 23(9):1851-93
111. Yasnoff WA, Sondik EJ. 1999. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in public health practice in the new millennium. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 5(4):ix-xii
112. Zayatz LY, Steel P, Rowland S. 2000. Disclosure limitation for Census 2000. Proc. Sect. Gov. Stat., Am. Stat. Assoc., Indianapolis