Adaptive Limiters for Improving the Accuracy of the MUSCL Approach for Unsteady Flows

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 170, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 161-183

  Billet, G ^a   Louedin, O ^a  

^a ONERA   (France)

Author keywords

Euler equations; MUSCL approach; Navier Stokes equations; TVD schemes

Indexed keywords

EULER'S EQUATION; MUSCL APPROACH; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION; PHYSICAL QUANTITIES; SPLITTINGS; TEST CASE; TVD SCHEME;

EID: 0037488003     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6731     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson W. K., Thomas J. L., van Leer B. Comparison of finite volume flux vector splittings for the Euler equation. AIAA J. 24:1986;1453.
2. Boris J. P., Grinstein F. F., Oran E. S., Kolbe R. L. New insights into large eddy simulations. Fluid Dyn. Res. 10:1992;199.
3. Cockburn B., Shu C.-W. Nonlinearly stable compact schemes for shocks calculations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 31:1994;607.
4. Garnier E., Mossi M., Sagaut P., Comte P., Deville M. On the use of shock-capturing schemes for large-eddy simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 153:1999;273.
5. L. Gozalo, and, R. Abgrall, A new limiter that improves TVD-MUSCL schemes, in, Godunov Methods: Theory and Applications, edited by, E. F. Toro, Kluwer Academic:sol;Plenum, Dordrecht/New York, 2000.
6. Hirsch C. Numerical Computations of Internal and External Flows. II:1990.
7. Lee T. D. On some statistical properties of hydrodynamical and magneto hydrodynamical fields. Q. Appl. Math. 10:1952;69.
8. M. Lesieur, Turbulence in Fluids, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1987.
9. Liou M. S., Steffen Ch. A new flux splitting scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 107:1993;23.
10. +. J. Comput. Phys. 129:1996;364.
11. Peyret R. Résolution numérique des systèmes hyperboliques. Application à la dynamique des gaz. 5:1977.
12. Porter D. H., Pouquet A., Woodward P. R. A numerical study of supersonic turbulence. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 4:1992;13.
13. Radespiel R., Kroll N. Accurate flux vector splitting for shocks and shear layers. J. Comput. Phys. 121:1995;66.
14. Richtmyer R. D., Morton K. W. Difference Methods for Initial Value Problems. 1967.
15. Roe P. L. Some Contributions to the Modelling of Discontinuous Flows. 22:1985.
16. Sandham N. D., Reynolds W. C. Three-dimensional simulations of large eddies in the compressible mixing layer. J. Fluid Mech. 224:1991;133.
17. C.-W. Shu, and, S. Osher, Efficient Implementation of Essentially Non-Oscillatory Shock-Capturing Schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 77, 439, 1988.
18. Shu C.-W., Osher S. Efficient implementation of Essentially Non-Oscillatory Shock-Capturing Schemes, II. 1988;506-517.
19. Strang W. G. On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 5:1968;3.
20. Sweby P. K. High resolution scheme using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21:1984;995.
21. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 32:1979;101.
22. van Leer B. Flux vector splitting for the Euler equations. Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluids Dynamics. 1982.
23. Yanenko N. N. A difference method of solution in the case of the multidimensional equation of heat conduction. Dokl. Akad. Nank SSR. 125:1959.
24. Yee H. C. Upwind and Symmetric Shock-Capturing Schemes. 1987;1207-1210.