Peer review: Is it for you?

Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 222-223

  Hooper, Vallire D ^a,b  

^a St Joseph's Hospital   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPETENCE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW; VOLUNTEER; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; NURSE ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARD; WORK;

GUIDELINES; HUMANS; JOB DESCRIPTION; NURSE'S ROLE; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH;

EID: 0037485459     PISSN: 10899472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1089-9472(03)00124-2     Document Type: Editorial

References (2)

1. Jefferson T., Alderson P., Wager E., et al. Effects of editorial review A systematic review . JAMA. 287:2002;2784-2786.
2. Iverson C., Flanagin A., Fontanarosa P.B., et al. American Medical Association Manual of Style A Guide for Authors and Editors . (ed 9):1998;Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.