Quantitative analysis and characterization of DNA immobilized on gold

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 17, 2003, Pages 5219-5226

  Petrovykh, Dmitri Y ^a,b   Kimura Suda, Hiromi ^c   Whitman, Lloyd J ^b   Tarlov, Michael J ^c  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

^b NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; ATTENUATION; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; GOLD; REACTION KINETICS; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

ELECTRON ATTENUATION;

DNA;

DNA; GOLD; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA MICROARRAY; FILM; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; KINETICS; SPECTROSCOPY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 0037473548     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja029450c     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Pirrung, M. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1277-1289.
2. Nelson, B. P.; Grimsrud, T. E.; Liles, M. R.; Goodman, R. M.; Corn, R. M. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 1-7.
3. Wang, J. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 3011-3016.
4. Tarlov, M. J.; Steel, A. B. In Biomolecular Films: Design, Function, and Applications; Rusling, J. F., Ed.: Marcel Dekker: New York, 2003; Vol. 111.
5. Kasemo, B. Surf. Sci. 2002, 500, 656-677.
6. Storhoff, J. J.; Elghanian, R.; Mirkin, C. A.; Letsinger, R. L. Langmuir 2002, 18, 6666-6670.
7. Demers, L. M.; Östblom, M.; Zhang, H.; Jang, N.-H.; Liedberg, B.; Mirkin, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11248-11249.
8. Anne, A.; Bouchardon, A.; Moiroux, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1112-1113.
9. Georgiadis, R.; Peterlinz, K. P.; Peterson, A. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3166-3173.
10. Peterlinz, K. A.; Georgiadis, R. M.; Herne, T. M.; Tarlov, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3401-3402.
11. Peterson, A. W.; Wolf, L. K.; Georgiadis, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14601-14607.
12. Castner, D. G.; Ratner, B. D. Surf. Sci. 2002, 500, 28-60.
13. Steel, A. B.; Levicky, R. L.; Herne, T. M.; Tarlov, M. J. Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 975-981.
14. Certain vendors and commercial instruments are identified to adequately specify the experimental procedure. In no case does such identification imply endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology or the Naval Research Laboratory.
15. Herne, T. M.; Tarlov, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8916-8920.
16. Petrovykh, D. Y.; Kimura-Suda, H.; Tarlov, M. J.; Whitman, L. J. Submitted for publication.
17. Hesse, R.; Chasse, T.; Szargan, R. Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem. 1999, 365, 48-54.
18. Barber, M.; Clark, D. T. Chem. Commun. 1970, 24-25.
19. Peeling, J.; Hruska, F. E.; McIntyre, N. S. Can. J. Chem. 1978, 56, 1555-1561.
20. Roelfs, B.; Bunge, E.; Schroter, C.; Solomun, T.; Meyer, H.; Nichols, R. J.; Baumgartel, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 754-765.
21. Zhao, Y. D.; Pang, D. W.; Hu, S.; Wang, Z. L.; Cheng, J. K.; Qi, Y. P.; Dai, H. P.; Mao, B. W.; Tian, Z. Q.; Luo, J.; Lin, Z. H. Anal. Chim. Acta 1999, 388, 93-101.
22. Wang, J.; Rivas, G.; Jiang, M. A.; Zhang, X. J. Langmuir 1999, 15, 6541-6545.
23. Mely, B.; Pullman, A. Theor. Chim. Acta 1969, 13, 278-287.
24. Snyder, L. C.; Shulman, R. G.; Neumann, D. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 53, 256-267.
25. Rein, R.; Nir, S.; Hartman, A. Isr. J. Chem. 1972, 10, 93-100.
26. Sexton, B. A.; Hughes, A. E. Surf. Sci. 1984, 140, 227-248.
27. Kawasaki, M.; Sato, T.; Tanaka, T.; Takao, K. Langmuir 2000, 16, 1719- 1728.
28. Castner, D. G.; Hinds, K.; Grainger, D. W. Langmuir 1996, 12, 5083- 5086.
29. Bensebaa, F.; Yu, Z.; Deslandes, Y.; Kruus, E.; Ellis, T. H. Surf. Sci. 1998, 405, L472-L476.
30. Laibinis, P. E.; Whitesides, G. M.; Allara, D. L.; Tao, Y. T.; Parikh, A. N.; Nuzzo, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7152-7167.
31. Rieley, H.; Kendall, G. K.; Zemicael, F. W.; Smith, T. L.; Yang, S. H. Langmuir 1998, 14, 5147-5153.
32. Buckel, F.; Effenberger, F.; Yan, C.; Golzhauser, A.; Grunze, M. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 901-905.
33. Haiss, W.; Roelfs, B.; Port, S. N.; Bunge, E.; Baumgartel, H.; Nichols, R. J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 454, 107-113.
34. Ratner, B. D.; Castner, D. G. In Surface Analysis-The Principal Techniques; Vickerman, J. C., Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 1997; pp 43-98.
35. Powell, C. J.; Jablonski, A. NIST Electron Effective-Attenuation-Length Database Version 1.0; NIST: Gaithersburg, MD, 2001.
36. Jablonski, A.; Powell, C. J. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2002, 47, 35-91.
37. Parameters determined by the experimental configuration (X-ray flux, illuminated sample area, analyzer acceptance) cancel out in the ratio. Instrumental transmission function values are provided by the manufacturer and can be independently checked, e.g. by measurements of multiple Au peaks on clean Au samples. Scofield sensitivity factors for the respective atomic orbitals are tabulated. EAL's and emission anisotropy factors are calculated using the NIST SRD software. See ref 16 for details.
38. Zhang, Y. Y.; Tirrell, M.; Mays, J. W. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 7299-7301.
39. Anderson, C. F.; Record, M. T. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1982, 33, 191-222.
40. Schwartz, D. K. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2001, 52, 107-137.
41. For practical reasons, this experiment has not been continued long enough to achieve an apparent saturation of the coverage. In experiments using the 1 M NACl-TE buffer, the coverage showed a similar linear increase between 1 and 1200 min and saturated after 8400 min at a lower value consistent with the buffer dependence in Figure 7.
42. Cohen Stuart, M. A.; Hoogendam, C. W.; de Keizer, A. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1997, 9, 7767-7783.