Dynamic materials through metal-directed and solvent-driven self-assembly of cavitands

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 42, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1384-1387

  Pirondini, Laura ^a   Stendardo, Anna G ^a   Geremia, Silvano ^b   Campagnolo, Mara ^b   Samorì, Paolo ^c   Rabe, Jürgen P ^c   Fokkens, Roel ^d   Dalcanale, Enrico ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cavitands; Dynamic materials; Nanostructures; Self assembly; Supramolecular chemistry

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; AGGLOMERATION; CORRELATION METHODS; HALOGENATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

SOLVOPHOBIC AGGREGATION (SA);

SELF ASSEMBLY;

2,3 DICHLOROQUINOXALINE; METAL; METAL COMPLEX; QUINOXALINE DERIVATIVE; SOLVENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARCHITECTURE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL REACTION; DYNAMICS; MATERIAL STATE; MATRIX ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

EID: 0037471192     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200390355     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. J. S. Lindsey, New J. Chem, 1995, 15, 153-180.
2. (a) J.-M. Lehn in Supramolecular Science: Where It Is and Where It Is Going (Eds.: R. Ungaro, E. Dalcanale), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999, 287-304;
3. (b) J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2455-2463.
4. (a) N. Zimmerman, J. S. Moore, S. C. Zimmerman, Chem. Ind. 1998, 604-610;
5. (b) Supramolecular Polymers (Ed.: A. Ciferri), Dekker, New York, 2000.
6. (a) R. P. Sijbesma, F. H. Beijer, L. Brunsveld, B. J. B. Folmer, J. H. K. K. Hirschberg, R. F. M. Lange, J. K. L. Lowe, E. W. Meijer, Science 1997, 278, 1601-1604;
7. (b) R. K. Castellano, D. M. Rudkevich, J. Rebek, Jr., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 7132-7137;
8. (c) R. K. Castellano, J. Rebek, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3657-3663.
9. (a) U. Michelsen, C. A. Hunter, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 780-783; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 764-767; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 764-767;
10. (a) U. Michelsen, C. A. Hunter, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 780-783; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 764-767; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 764-767;
11. (b) L. Brunsveld, B. J. B. Folmer, E. W. Meijer, R. P. Sijbesma, Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 4071-4097;
12. (c) U. S. Schubert, C. Eschbaumer, Angew. Chem, 2002, 114, 3016-3050; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2892-2926;
13. (c) U. S. Schubert, C. Eschbaumer, Angew. Chem, 2002, 114, 3016-3050; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2892-2926;
14. (d) D. G. Kurth, N. Severin, J. P. Rabe, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 3833-3835; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3681-3683.
15. (d) D. G. Kurth, N. Severin, J. P. Rabe, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 3833-3835; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3681-3683.
16. (a) W. T. S. Huck, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, B. L. Kropman, D. H. A. Blank, E. G. Keim, M. M. A. Smithers, D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8293-8294;
17. (b) W. T. S. Huck, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1304-1306; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1213-1215.
18. (b) W. T. S. Huck, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, D. N. Reinhoudt, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 1304-1306; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1213-1215.
19. G. Li, L. B. McGown, Science 1994, 264, 249-251.
20. J.-M. Lehn, Science 2002, 295, 2400-2403.
21. (a) J. R. Moran, J. L. Ericson, E. Dalcanale, J. A. Bryant, C. B. Knobler, D. J. Cram, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 5707-5714;
22. (b) D. J. Cram, H.-J. Choi, J. A. Bryant, C. B. Knobler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7748-7765.
23. L. Pirondini, D. Bonifazi, E. Menozzi, E. Wegelius, K. Rissanen, C. Massera, E. Dalcanale, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 2311-2320.
24. B. C. Gibb, R. G. Chapman, J. C. Sherman, J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1505-1509.
25. 1H NMR spectroscopy up to 373 K.
26. i is the initial concentration of monomer.
27. 2 (SHELXL-97). Several solvent molecules were detected in the asymmetric unit: 0.5 molecules of triethyleneglycol, 1.5 molecules of diethyleneglycol, 8.5 molecules of ethanol, and 6 water molecules. CCDC-194186 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/ conts/retrieving.html (or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road, Cambridge CB21EZ, UK; fax: (+ 44) 1223-336-033; or deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
28. -1).
29. The spot wells of the MALDI-TOF sample plate containing millimolar solutions of the assemblies in different solvents were covered with a thin poly(ethyleneglycol) film. In this way the original constitution of the sample solutions is mostly preserved, and evaporation is kept to a minimum.
30. For the opposite behavior in hydrogen-bonded velcrands see: F. C. Tucci, D. M. Rudkevich, J. Rebek, Jr., Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1007-1016.
31. J. P. Rabe, S. Buchholz, Science 1991, 253, 424-427.
32. The rod widths were determined by taking into account the broadening due to the convolution with the SFM tip, as described in: P. Samorí, V. Francke, K. Müllen, J. P. Rabe, Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2312-2317.
33. The individual supramolecular rods could not be resolved due to the limitation in the SFM resolution and to their tight packing.
34. [5d] the cavitand-based supramolecular polymer is very likely lying on the top of an alkane monolayer (SAM) self-assembled on HOPG, taking advantage of the high surface potential ripple of the underlying SAM.
35. The apparent rod thickness of 0.8 nm is at the lower end end of the expected range. This can be due to both the flattening at surfaces occurring upon adsorption and to imaging artifacts. The latter can include indentation of the supramolecular object by the probing tip as well as the adhesion of the tip to the surface as discussed in: P. Samorf, C. Ecker, I. Gössl, P. A. J. de Witte, J. J. L. M. Cornelissen, G. A. Metselaar, M. B. J. Otten, A. E. Rowan, R. J. M. Nolte, J. P. Rabe, Macromolecules 2002, 35, 5290-5294.