Structural aspects of donor-acceptor interactions

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 107, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1197-1202

  Horváth, Viktória ^a,b   Kovács, Attila ^a   Hargittai, István ^a,b  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^b EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARGE TRANSFER; CHEMICAL BONDS; DISSOCIATION; GEOMETRY; OPTIMIZATION; POTENTIAL ENERGY;

DONOR-ACCEPTOR INTERACTIONS;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0037468205     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp022072d     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hargittai, I.; Levy, J. B. Struct. Chem. 1999, 10, 387-389.
2. Rablen, P. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8350-8360.
3. Anane, H.; Boutalib, A.; Nebot-Gil, I.; Tomás, F. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 120, 7070-7073.
4. Anane, H.; Boutalib, A.; Nebot-Gil, I.; Tomás, F. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 287, 575-578.
5. Anane, H.; Jarid, A.; Boutalib, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 9847-9852.
6. Anane, H.; Jarid, A.; Boutalib, A.; Nebot-Gil, I.; Tomás, F. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 1998, 455, 51.
7. Ghosh, D. C. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.) 1984, 93, 33-46.
8. Harabaev, N. N.; Rachkovskii, V. V.; Garnovskii, A. D. Zh. Obshch. Khim. 1995, 65, 1650-1654.
9. Timoshkin, A. Y.; Bettinger, H. F.; Schaefer, H. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9, 5668.
10. Beste, A.; Krämer, O.; Gerhard, A.; Frenking, G. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 2037.
11. Jagielska, A.; Moszynski, R.; Piela, L. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 947-954.
12. Kristyán, S.; Pulay, P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 229, 175.
13. Møller, C.; Plesset, M. S. Phys. Rev. 1934, 46, 618.
14. Reed, A. E.; Curtiss, L. A.; Weinhold, F. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899.
15. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Gonzalez, C.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gouzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.5 ed.; Gaussian Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
16. Glendening, E. D.; Badenhoop, J. K.; Reed, A. E.; Carpenter, J. E.; Bohmann, J. A.; Morales, C. M.; Weinhold, F. NBO 5.0, Theoretical Chemistry Institute, University of Wisconsin: Madison, 2001.
17. Thorne, L. R.; Suenram, R. D.; Lovas, F. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 78, 167.
18. s substitution geometry, which is only an operational representation without rigorous physical meaning, is supposed to well approximate the equilibrium geometry. For the bond angles, as they correspond to ratios of distances, the comparison is even more straightforward.
19. Hargittai, M.; Hargittai, I.; Spiridonov, V. P.; Pelissier, M.; Labarre, J. F. J. Mol. Struct. 1975, 24, 27.
20. Hargittai, M.; Hargittai, I.; Spiridonov, V. P. J. Mol. Struct. 1976, 30, 31.
21. Avent, A. G.; Hitchcock, P. B.; Lappert, M. F.; Liu, D.-S.; Mignani, G.; Richard, C.; Roche, E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 855-856.
22. Hargittai, M.; Hargittai, I. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1992, 44, 1057-1067.
23. Kovács, A.; Csonka, G. I.; Keserû, Gy. M. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 308-318.
24. Kovács, A.; Csonka, G. I. Int. J. Quantum. Chem. 1997, 65, 817-826.
25. Kovács, A.; Szabó, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 305, 458-464.
26. Hargittai, I.; Hargittai, M. J. Mol. Struct. 1977, 39, 79.
27. Hargittai, M.; Hargittai, I. The Molecular Geometries of Coordination Compounds in the Vapour Phase; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1977; pp 68-71.
28. 3 do not necessarily mean that they repel each other. It has been found in several donor-acceptor complexes that despite the small positive or negative atomic charges the local charge distribution can show electron concentration or depletion, respectively, on the side facing the counterpart atom. See, e.g.: Timoshin, A. Y.; Frenking, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7240.
29. Gillespie, R. J.; Hargittai, I. The VSEPR Model of Molecular Geometry; Allyn and Bacon: Boston, 1991.
30. 3v reorganization have been discussed recently: Ghosh, D. C.; Jana, J.; Chakraborty, A. Indian J. Chem. 2002, 41, 462.
31. Cyvin, S. J.; Cyvin, B. N.; Hargittai, I. J. Mol. Struct. 1974, 23, 385.