Tandem electrostatic effect from the first to the third aglycon in the trimeric RNA owing to the nearest-neighbor interaction

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 2094-2100

  Acharya, P ^a   Acharya, S ^a   Foldesi A ^a   Chattopadhyaya, J ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PSEUDOAROMATICITY;

ALKALINITY; ELECTROSTATICS; GROUND STATE; PH EFFECTS; PROTEINS; TITRATION;

RNA;

CYTOSINE DERIVATIVE; GUANOSINE DERIVATIVE; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND; NUCLEIC ACID; RNA;

ALKALINITY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; ELECTRICITY; HYDROGEN BOND; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PH; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; TITRIMETRY;

ELECTROSTATICS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; KINETICS; RIBONUCLEOTIDES; RNA; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0037466990     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja028277h     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Jeffrey, G. A.; Saenger, W. Hydrogen Boding in Biological Systems; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1991.
2. Saenger, W. Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure; Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.
3. (a) Cech, T. R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1990, 59, 543.
4. (b) Batey, R. T.; Rambo, R. P.; Doudna, J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2326.
5. (a) Thibaudeau, C.; Plavec, J.; Chattopadhyaya, J. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 266.
6. (b) Acharya, P.; Trifonova, A.; Thibaudeau, C.; Földesi, A.; Chattopadhyaya, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 3645.
7. For review see: Thibaudeau, C., Chattopadhyaya, J. Stereoelectronic Effects in Nucleosides and Nucleotides and their Structural Implications, (ISBN 91-506-1351-0), Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Uppsala University Press (jyoti@boc.uu.se): Sweden, 1999 and references therein.
8. (a) Burkard, M. E.; Kierzek, R.; Turner, D. H. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 290, 967 and references therein.
9. (b) Bommarito, S.; Peyret, N.; SantaLucia, J., Jr. Nucleic Acid Res. 2000, 28, 1929.
10. (c) Rosemeyer, H.; Seela, F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2002, 746-750.
11. (a) Ossipov, D.; Zamaaratski, E.; Chattopadhyaya, J. Nucleosides & Nucleotides 1998, 17 (9-11), 1613.
12. (b) Maltseva, T. V.; Agback, P.; Repkova, M. N.; Venyaminova, A. G.; Ivanova, E. M.; Sandström, A.; Zarytova, V. F.; Chattopadhyaya, J. Nucleic Acid Res. 1994, 22, 5590.
13. (c) Ossipov, D.; Pradeepkumar, P. I.; Holmer, M.; Chattopadhyaya, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3551.
14. (a) Hunter, C. A. J. Mol. Biol. 1993, 230, 1025 and references therein.
15. (b) Packer, M. J.; Dauncey, M. P.; Hunter, C. A. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 71.
16. The importance of stacking has been identified in DNA polymerase activity and in efficiency of DNA synthesis. For review: Kool, E. T. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2001, 30, 1, and references therein.
17. The interaction of the aromatic rings depends on the stacking geometry: edge-to-face, (ii) offset stacked, and (iii) face-to-face stacked. The offset stacked arrangement minimizes π-electron repulsion and maximizes the interactions in the σ-framework. For review: Hunter, C. A.; Lawson, K. R.; Perkins, J.; Urch, C. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 651.
18. The experimental evidence showed that the magnitude of offset-stacking interactions can be dictated by the geometry of the stacked components, which, in turn, is influenced by the nature of ring substituents. Rashkin, M. J.; Waters, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1860 and refs 1, 2, and 8 therein. (b) Newcomb, L. F.; Gellman, S. H. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4993. (c) Kim, E.; Paliwal, S.; Wilcox, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11 192. (d) Jennings, W. B.; Farrell, B. M.; Malone, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 885. (e) Carver, F. J.; Hunter, C. A.; Seward, E. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 775.
19. The experimental evidence showed that the magnitude of offset-stacking interactions can be dictated by the geometry of the stacked components, which, in turn, is influenced by the nature of ring substituents. Rashkin, M. J.; Waters, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1860 and refs 1, 2, and 8 therein. (b) Newcomb, L. F.; Gellman, S. H. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4993. (c) Kim, E.; Paliwal, S.; Wilcox, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11 192. (d) Jennings, W. B.; Farrell, B. M.; Malone, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 885. (e) Carver, F. J.; Hunter, C. A.; Seward, E. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 775.
20. The experimental evidence showed that the magnitude of offset-stacking interactions can be dictated by the geometry of the stacked components, which, in turn, is influenced by the nature of ring substituents. Rashkin, M. J.; Waters, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1860 and refs 1, 2, and 8 therein. (b) Newcomb, L. F.; Gellman, S. H. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4993. (c) Kim, E.; Paliwal, S.; Wilcox, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11 192. (d) Jennings, W. B.; Farrell, B. M.; Malone, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 885. (e) Carver, F. J.; Hunter, C. A.; Seward, E. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 775.
21. The experimental evidence showed that the magnitude of offset-stacking interactions can be dictated by the geometry of the stacked components, which, in turn, is influenced by the nature of ring substituents. Rashkin, M. J.; Waters, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1860 and refs 1, 2, and 8 therein. (b) Newcomb, L. F.; Gellman, S. H. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4993. (c) Kim, E.; Paliwal, S.; Wilcox, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11 192. (d) Jennings, W. B.; Farrell, B. M.; Malone, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 885. (e) Carver, F. J.; Hunter, C. A.; Seward, E. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 775.
22. The experimental evidence showed that the magnitude of offset-stacking interactions can be dictated by the geometry of the stacked components, which, in turn, is influenced by the nature of ring substituents. Rashkin, M. J.; Waters, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1860 and refs 1, 2, and 8 therein. (b) Newcomb, L. F.; Gellman, S. H. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4993. (c) Kim, E.; Paliwal, S.; Wilcox, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11 192. (d) Jennings, W. B.; Farrell, B. M.; Malone, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 885. (e) Carver, F. J.; Hunter, C. A.; Seward, E. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 775.
23. -1) in interaction with HOMO [-0.3996 au] of the indole ring. Ishida, T.; Shibata, M.; Fuji, K.; Inoue, M. Biochemistry 1983, 22, 3571.
24. Xu, D.; Nordlund, T. M. Biophys. J. 2000, 78, 1042.
25. a for compounds 1-4. See ref 20 for the details of the theoretical basis of abovementioned equation.
26. Guerra, C. F.; Bickelhaupt, F. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2942.
27. (a) Narlikar, G. J.; Herschlag, D. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1997, 66, 19, and references therein.
28. (b) Legault, P.; Pardi, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6621 and references therein.
29. (c) Ravindranathan, S.; Butcher, S. E.; Feigon, J. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 16 026.
30. (d) Drohat, A. C.; Stivers, J. T. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 11 865.
31. (e) Nakano, S.; Chadalavada, D. M.; Bevilacqua, P. C. Science 2000, 287, 1493 and references therein.
32. (f) Xiong, L.; Polacek, N.; Sander, P.; Böttger, E. C.; Mankin, A. RNA 2001, 7, 1365.
33. (g) Ryder, S. P.; Oyelere, A. K.; Padilla, J. L.; Klostermeier, D.; Millar, D. P.; Strobel, S. A. RNA 2001, 7, 1454, and references therein.
34. Schmidt, A.; Kindermann, M. K.; Vainotalo, P.; Nieger, M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 64, 9499.
35. (a) Chan, S. I.; Nelson, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 168.
36. (b) Altona, C. In Structure and Conformation of Nucleic Acids and Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions; Sundaralingam, M., Rao, S. T., Eds.; University Park Press: Baltimore, 1975, 613.
37. (c) Lee, C.-H.; Ezra, F. S.; Kondo, N. S.; Sarma, R. H.; Danyluk, S. Biochemistry 1976, 15, 3627.
38. (d) Topal, M. D.; Warshaw, M. M. Biopolymers 1976, 15, 1775.
39. (e) Kolondny, N. H.; Neville, A. C.; Coleman, D. L.; Zamecnik, P. C. Biopolymers 1977, 16, 259.
40. Cox, R. A. A Biochem. J. 1966, 100, 148.
41. a Prediction for Organic Acids and Bases; Chapman and Hall: New York, 1981.
42. (b) Sharp, K. A.; Honig, B. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Chem. 1990, 19, 301.
43. (a) Nakamura, M.; Oki, M. Chem. Lett. 1976, 651.
44. (b) Ferguson, S. B.; Seward, E. M.; Diederich, F.; Sanford, E. M.; Chou, A.; Inocencio-Szweda, P.; Knobler, C. B. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 5593.
45. (c) Burley, S. K.; Petsko, G. A. Science 1985, 229, 23.
46. (d) Hunter, C. A.; Singh, J.; Thornton, J. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 218, 837.
47. (e) Beugelmans-Verrier, M.; Guilhem, J. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 3847.
48. (f) Royer, J.; Beugelmans-Verrier, M.; Tetrahedron 1979, 35, 2369.
49. (g) Beugelmans-Verrier, M.; Nicolas, L.; Gaudemer, A.; Parello, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 361.
50. (h) Doughterty, D. A.; Stauffer, D. A. Science, 1990, 250, 1558.
51. (i) Stauffer, D. A.; Barrans, R. E.; Jr.; Doughterty, D. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 915.
52. (g) Cheney, B. V.; Schultz, M. W.; Cheney, J.; Richards, W. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4195.
53. (k) Atwood, J. L.; Hamada, F.; Robinson, K. D.; Orr, G. W.; Vincent, R. L. Nature 1991, 349, 683.
54. (l) Cozzi, F.; Cinquini, M.; Annuziata, R.; Dwyer, T.; Siegel, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5729.
55. (m) Cozzi, F.; Cinquini, M.; Annuziata, R.; Siegel, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5330.
56. (n) Cozzi, F.; Annuziata, R.; Benaglia, M.; Cinquini, M.; Raimondi, L.; Baldridge, K. K.; Siegel, J. S. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2002 (in web, DOI: 10.1039/b208871a).
57. H8A(pAp) of 0.12 ppm at the N state and 0.124 ppm in D state.
58. N-D: -0.069.
59. pKa found is owing to slight changes in the microenvironment of the dimer and as well as the electronic properties trimers with respect to the monomer (see also ref 25).
60. 1p shows a detectable upfield shift over the pH range. Thus, the different pH-dependent tunibility of δH8 and δH2 of adenin-9-yl in pA and pAp, indicates the sequence-dependency owing to differential modulation of the pseudoaromatic character of adenine-9-yl in 2-4 by the effect of the nearest-neighbor.
61. 8,10 to pAp to experience the differential electrostatic interaction from the 5′terminal guanylate to minimize the Coulombic repulsion in GpApA (3). In contrast, the pAp in GpApC (4) is "offset stacked" such that imidazole part of pAp is within the influence of π-electron system of the guanylate anion, whereas the C5-C6 double bond of pC is also "offset stacked" with respect to pAp.
62. For review: Patel, D. J.; Suri, A. K. Rev. Mol. Biotechnol. 2000, 74, 39.
63. For review: Ramakrishnan, V. Cell 2002, 69, 557.
64. Leninger, A. L.; Nelson, D. L.; Cox, M. M. Principles of Biochemistry, Second Edition; Worth Publishers Inc.: New York, 1993.
65. Acharya, S.; Acharya, P.; Földesi, A.; Chattopadhyaya, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13 722.
66. 8,10 which means that the imidazole edge of adenin-9-yl is within the stacking interaction of 9-guaninyl face.
67. a unit on the terminal guanin-9-yl in Gp in our case) upon an increase of the total number of phosphates in the molecule as a result of chain elongation.