Planktonic encounter rates in homogeneous isotropic turbulence: The case of predators with limited fields of sensory perception

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 222, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 73-97

  Lewis, D M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Copepod grazing; Kinetic simulations; Planktonic predation strategies; Restricted sensory perception; Turbulent encounter rates

Indexed keywords

ENCOUNTER RATE; PLANKTON; PREDATOR; THEORETICAL STUDY; TURBULENCE;

ARTICLE; KINEMATICS; PERCEPTION; PLANKTON; PREDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SWIMMING; TURBULENT FLOW;

COPEPODA;

EID: 0037466393     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00015-8     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alcarez M. Turbulence and copepods. grazing behaviour and metabolic rates Scientia Marina. 61(Suppl. 1):1997;177-195.
2. Baird M.E., Emsley S.E. Towards a mechanistic model of plankton population dynamics. J. Plankton Res. 21:1999;85-126.
3. Batchelor G.K. The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. 1953;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
4. Boffetta G., Sokolov I.M. Relative dispersion in fully developed turbulence. the Richardson's law and intermittency corrections Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(9):2002;1-4, 094501.
5. Bundy M.H., Paffenhöfer G.A. Analysis of flow fields associated with freely swimming calonoid copepods. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 133:1996;99-113.
6. Bundy M.H., Gross T.F., Vanderploeg H.A., Strickler J.R. Perception of inert particles by calanoid copepods. behavioural observations and a numerical model J. Plankton Res. 20:1998;2129-2152.
7. Buskey E.J., Coulter C., Strom S. Locomotory patterns of microzooplankton. potential effects on food selectivity of larval fish Bull. Mar. Sci. 53:1993;29-40.
8. Corey D.P., García-Añoveros J. Mechanosensation and the DEG/ENaC ion channel. Science. 273:1996;323-324.
9. Costello J.H., Strickler J.R., Marrasé C., Trager G., Teller R., Freise A.J. Grazing in a turbulent environment. behavioural response of calanoid copepod Centrophages hamatus Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 87:1990;1648-1652.
10. Evans G.T. The encounter speed of moving predator and prey. J. Plankton Res. 11:1989;415-417.
11. Fields D.M., Yen J. Implications of the feeding current structure of Eucheata rimana, a carnivorous copepod, on the spatial orientation of their prey. J. Plankton Res. 19:1997;79-95.
12. French A.S. Transduction mechanisms of mechanosensilla. Annual Rev. Entomol. 33:1988;39-58.
13. Frenkiel F.N., Klebanoff P.S. Probability distributions and correlations in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids. 16:1973;725-737.
14. Fung .J.C.H., Hunt J.C.R., Malik N.A., Perkins R.J. Kinematics simulations of homogeneous turbulence by unsteady random Fourier modes. J. Fluid Mech. 236:1992;281-318.
15. Gargett A.E., Osborn T.R., Nasmyth P.W. Local isotropy and the decay of turbulence in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 144:1984;231-280.
16. Gerritsen J., Strickler J.R. Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton. a mathematical model J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34:1977;73-82.
17. Hill P.S., Nowell A.R.M., Jumas P.A. Encounter rate by turbulent shear of particles similar in diameter to the Kolmogorov scale. J. Mar. Res. 50:1992;643-668.
18. Hwang J.S., Costello J.H., Strickler J.R. Copepod grazing in a turbulent flow. elevated foraging behaviour and habituation of escape responses J. Plankton Res. 16:1994;421-431.
19. Jiang H., Meneveau C., Osborn T.R. Numerical study of the feeding current around a copepod. J. Plankton Res. 21:1999;1391-1421.
20. Kiørboe T., MacKenzie B.R. Turbulence-enhanced prey encounter rates in larval fish. effects of spatial scale, larval behaviour and size J. Plankton Res. 17:1995;2319-2331.
21. Kiørboe T., Saiz E. Planktivorous feeding in calm and turbulent environments with emphasis on copepods. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 122:1995;135-145.
22. Kiørboe T., Saiz E., Visser A.W. Hydrodynamic signal perception in the copepod Acartia tonsa. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 179:1999;97-111.
23. Kiørboe T., Visser A.W. Predator and prey perception in copepods due to hydromechanical signals. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 179:1999;81-96.
24. Kraichnan R.H. Diffusion by a random velocity field. Phys. Fluids. 13:1970;22-31.
25. Lewis D.M. The orientation of gyrotactic micro-organisms in a homogeneous isotropic turbulent flow. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A. 459:2003;1-31.
26. Lewis D.M., Pedley T.J. Planktonic contact rates in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. theoretical predictions and kinematic simulations J. Theor. Biol. 205:2000;377-408. (Denoted by LP in the text.).
27. Lewis D.M., Pedley T.J. The influence of turbulence on plankton predation strategies. J. Theor. Biol. 210:2001;347-365.
28. Mackenzie B.R., Miller T.J., Cyr S., Leggett W.C. Evidence for a dome shaped relationship between turbulence and larval fish ingestion rates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39:1994;1790-1799.
29. Malik N.A., Vassilicos J.C. A Lagrangian model for turbulent dispersion turbulent-like flow structure. comparison with direct numerical simulation for two particle statistics Phys. Fluids. 11:1999;1572-1580.
30. Marrasé C., Costello J.H., Granata T., Strickler J.R. Grazing in a turbulent environment. energy dissipation, encounter rates and efficacy of feeding currents in Centropages hamatus Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 87:1990;1653-1657.
31. Muelbert J.H., Lewis M.R., Kelley D.E. The importance of small-scale turbulence in the feeding of herring larvae. J. Plankton Res. 16:1994;927-944.
32. Oakely N.S., Elliot J.A. Dissipation within the surface mixed layer. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 12:1982;171-185.
33. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes in Fortran, 2nd Edition. 1992;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
34. Rothschild B.J., Osborn T.R. Small-scale turbulence and plankton contact rates. J. Plankton Res. 10:1988;465-474.
35. Strickler J.R. Calanoid copepods, feeding currents and the role of gravity. Science. 218:1982;158-160.
36. Stuart A., Ord J.K. Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics - Vol. 1. Distribution Theory 6th Edition:1994;Edward Arnold, London.
37. Sundaram S., Collins L.R. Numerical considerations in simulating a turbulent suspension of finite volume particles. J. Comput. Phys. 124:1996;337-350.
38. Sundby S., Fossum P. Feeding conditions of arcto-norwegian cod larvae compared with the Rothschild-Osborn theory on small scale turbulence and planktonic contact rates. J. Plankton Res. 12:1990;1153-1162.
39. Tennekes H., Lumley J. A First Course in Turbulence. 1972;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
40. Tiselius P., Jonsson P. Foraging behaviour of six calanoid copepods. observations and hydrodynamic analysis Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 66:1990;22-33.
41. Van Atta C.W., Chen W.Y. Correlation measurements in grid turbulence using digital harmonic analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 34:1968;497-515.
42. Viitasalo M., Kiørboe T., Flinkman T., Pedersen L.W., Visser A.W. Predation vulnerability of planktonic copepods. consequences of predator foraging strategies and prey sensory abilities Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 175:1998;129-142.
43. Visser A.W., Jonsson P.R. On the reorientation of non-spherical prey particles in a feeding current. J. Plankton Res. 22:2000;761-777.
44. Waggett R.W., Costello J.H. Capture mechanisms used by the lobate ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi, preying on the copepod Acartia tonsa. J. Plankton Res. 21:1999;2037-2052.
45. Yamazaki H. Stratified turbulence near a critical dissipation rate. J. Phys. Fluids. 10:1990;1583-1598.
46. Yamazaki H., Osborn T.R., Squires K.D. Direct numerical simulation of planktonic contact rate in turbulent flow. J. Plankton Res. 13:1991;629-643.
47. Yen J., Strickler J.R. Advertisement and concealment in plankton. what makes a copepod hydrodynamically conspicuous? Invertebrate Biol. 115:1996;191-205.