Coherent collisions between Bose-Einstein condensates

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 030403/1-030403/4

  Vogels, J M ^a   Chin, J K ^a   Ketterle, W ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC PHYSICS; CALCULATIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FOUR WAVE MIXING; LASER PULSES; PHOTONS; RAYLEIGH SCATTERING; STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATE; NONDEGENERATE PARAMETRIC AMPLIFIER; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT; TWO-PHOTON STIMULATED OPTICAL TRANSITION;

QUANTUM OPTICS;

EID: 0037462899     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.030403     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. L. Deng et al., Nature (London) 398, 218 (1999).
2. J. M. Vogels, K. Xu, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 020401 (2002).
3. The atomic amplifier is nondegenerate in the sense that both amplified modes are distinct. This should not be confused with the energetic degeneracy of all four waves in the center-of-mass frame.
4. M. J. Holland and K. Burnett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1355 (1993).
5. P. Bouyer and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1083 (1997).
6. M. Greiner et al., Nature (London) 419, 51 (2002).
7. F. Dalfovo et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999).
8. S. Dettmer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 160406 (2001).
9. M. Kozuma et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 871 (1999).
10. A.P. Chikkatur et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 483 (2000).
11. A. Lamas-Linares, J.C. Howell, and D. Bouwmeester, Nature (London) 412, 887 (2001).
12. M. R. Andrews et al., Science 275, 637 (1997).
13. J. Stenger, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4569 (1999).