Behavioral variation among cloned pigs

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 321-331

  Archer, Gregory S ^a   Friend, T H ^a   Piedrahita, J ^b,c   Nevill, C H ^a,d   Walker, S ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SOUTHWEST FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Clone; Differences; Pig; Swine; Variation

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CLONE; PIG;

ANIMALIA; DAUCUS CAROTA; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0037460083     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00272-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barlow, D.P., 1995. Genetic imprinting in mammals. Science 270, 1610-1613.
2. Campbell, R.G., 1976. A note on the use of a feed flavour to stimulate the feed intake of weanling pigs. Anim. Prod. 23, 417-419.
3. Danilova, V., Roberts, R., Hellekant, G., 1999. Responses of single taste fibers and whole Chorda Tympani and Glossopharyngeal Nerve in domestic pig, Sus scrofa. Chem. Senses. 24, 301-316.
4. Fraser, A.F., Broom, D.M., 1996. Farm Animal Behavior and Welfare. Bailliere Tindall, London, pp. 251-252.
5. Gold, J.D., Pedersen, R.A., 1994. Mechanisms of genomic imprinting in mammals. Curr. Topics Dev. Bio. 29, 227-280.
6. Hessing, M.J.C., Hagelso, A.M., van Beek, J.A.M., Wiepkema, P.R., Schouten, W.G.P., Krukow, R., 1993. Individual behavioural characteristics in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 37, 285-295.
7. Kare, M.R., 1993. Dukes' Physiology of Domestic Animals, 11th ed. Comstock Publishing, New York, pp. 816-835.
8. Kare, M.R., Ficken, M.S., 1963. Comparative studies on the sense of taste. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Olfaction and Taste, Stockholm, pp. 285-297.
9. Kare, M.R., Pond, W.G., Campbell, J., 1965. Observations on the taste reactions in pigs. Anim. Behav. 13, 265-269.
10. Kennedy, J.M., Baldwin, B.A., 1972. Taste preferences in pigs for nutritive and non-nutritive sweet solutions. Anim. Behav. 20, 706-718.
11. King, R.H., 1979. The effect of adding a feed flavour to the diets of young pigs before and after weaning. Aust. J. Agric. Anim. Husb. 19, 695-697.
12. Kobayashi, S., Kohda, T, Ichikawa, H., Ogura, A., Ohki, M., Kaneko-Ishino, T., Ishino, F., 2002. Paternal expression of a novel imprinted gene, Peg12/Frat3, in the Mouse 7C region homologous to the Prader-Willi syndrome region. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 290, 403-408.
13. Lawrence, A.B., Terlouw, E.M.C., Illius, A.W., 1991. Individual differences in behavioral responses of pigs exposed to non-social and social challenges. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 30, 73-86.
14. Mack, A., Singh, A., Gilroy, C., Ireland, W., 1997. Porcine lingual taste buds: a quantitative study. Anat. Rec. 247, 33-37.
15. McLaughlin, C.L., Baile, C.A., Buckholtz, L.L., Freeman, S.K., 1983. Preferred flavors and performance of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 56, 1287-1293.
16. Murphy, S.K., Wylie, A.A., Jirtle, R.L., 2001. Imprinting of PEG3, the human homologue of a mouse gene involved in nurturing behavior. Genomics 71, 110-117.
17. Walker, S., Shin, T.Y., Zaunbrecher, G.M., Romano, J.E., Johnson, G.A., Bazer, F.W., Piedrahhita, J.A., 2002. A highly efficient method for porcine cloning by nuclear transfer using in vitro-mature oocytes. Clon. Stem Cells 4 (2), 105-112.
18. Young, L.E., Fairburn, H.R., 2000. Improving the safety of embryo technologies: possible role of genomic imprinting. Theriogenology 53, 627-648.