Psychology of computer use: XXXVIII. Compatibility of task presentation and task structure in human-computer interaction

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 163-175

  Zhao, Baijun ^a   Salvendy, Gavriel ^b,c  

^a Tellabs International INC

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005544051     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.1.163     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ANDERSON, V. L. (1974) Design of experiments. New York: Dekker.
2. BROOKE, J. B., & DUNCAN, K. D. (1980a) An experimental study of flowcharts as an aid to identification of procedural faults. Ergonomics, 23, 387-399.
3. BROOKE, J. B., & DUNCAN, K. D. (1980b) Flowcharts versus lists as aides in program debugging. Ergonomics, 23, 1057-1091.
4. CAMPBELL, D. J. (1991) Goal level, complex tasks, and strategy development: a review and analysis. Human Performance, 4, 1-31.
5. COLL, R., THYAGARAJAN, A., & CHOPRA, S. (1991) An experiment study comparing the effectiveness of computer graphics data versus computer tabular data. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, 21, 897-900.
6. COURY, B. G., & PIETRAS, C. M. (1989) Alphanumeric and graphic displays for dynamics process monitoring and control. Ergonomics, 32, 1373-1389.
7. FLEISHMAN, E. A., & QUAINTANCE, M. K. (1984) Taxonomies of human performance: the description of human tasks. New York: Academic Press.
8. GERSTERNDORFER, M., & ROHR, G. (1987) Which task in which representation on what kind of interface. In H-J. Bullinger & B. Shackel (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction-INTER-ACT'87. New York: Elsevier Science. Pp. 513-518.
9. GILMORE, D. J., & SMITH, H. T. (1984) An investigation of the utility of flowcharts during computer program debugging. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 20, 357-372.
10. GUASTELLO, S. J., & TRAUT, M. (1989) Verbal versus pictorial representation of objects in a human-computer interface. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31, 99-120.
11. HOWES, A., & PAYNE, S. J. (1990) Display-based competence: towards user models for menu-driven interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33, 637-655.
12. JORNA, R. (1988) A comparison of presentation and representation: linguistic and pictorial. In G. C. V. Veer & G. Mulder (Eds.), Human computer interaction: psychonomic aspects. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 172-185.
13. LEHTO, M. R., SHARIT, J., & SALVENDY, G. (1991) The application of cognitive stimulation techniques to work measurement and methods analysis of production control tasks. International Journal of Production Research, 29, 1565-1586.
14. SCHAUBROECK, J., & MURALIDHAR, K. (1991) A meta-analysis of the relative effects of tabular and graphic display formats on decision-making performance. Human Performance, 4(2), 127-145.
15. SHNEIDERMAN, B. (1992) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. SHNEIDERMAN, B., MAYER, R., MCKAY, D., & HELLER, P. (1977) Experimental investigations of the utility of detailed flowcharts in programming. Communications of ACM, 20, 373-381.
17. WICKENS, C. D. (1992) Engineering psychology and human performance. New York: Harper Collins.