Automatic identification and representation of protein binding sites for molecular docking

Protein Science

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 524-533

  Ruppert, Jim ^a   Welch, Will ^a   Jain, Ajay N ^a,b  

^a Arris Pharmaceutical Corporation   (United States)

^b MetaXen   (United States)

Author keywords

binding site; molecular docking; protein surface representation; protein ligand interaction

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; LIGAND BINDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; SCREENING;

EID: 0030979125     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560060302     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bohm H-J. 1994. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Des 8:243-256.
2. Bolin JT, Filman DJ, Matthews DA, Hamlin RC, Kraut J. 1982. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus casei dihydrofolate reductase refined at 1.7 Å resolution. J Biol Chem 257(22):13650-13662.
3. Clark DE, Frenkel D, Levy SA, Li J, Murray CW, Robson B, Waszkowycz B, Westhead DR. 1995. PRO_LIGAND: An approach to de novo molecular design. 1. Application to the design of organic molecules. J Comput Aided Mol Des 9:13-32.
4. Goodford PJ. 1985. A computational procedure for determining energetically favourable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J Med Chem 25:849-857.
5. Gehlhaar DK, Verhivker GM, Rejto PA, Sherman CJ, Fogel DB, Fogel LJ, Freer ST. 1995. Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: Conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. Chemistry & Biology 2:317-324.
6. Jain AN. 1996. Scoring non-covalent ligand-protein interactions: A continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities. J Comput Aided Mol Des 10:427-440.
7. Jiang F, Kim S-H. 1991. "Soft Docking": Matching of molecular surface cubes. J Mol Biol 219:79-102.
8. Lin SL, Nussinov R, Fischer D, Wolfson HJ. 1994. Molecular surface representations by sparse critical points. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 18:94-101.
9. Miller MD, Kearsley SK, Underwood DJ, Sheridan RP. 1994. FLOG: A system to select "quasi-flexible" ligands complementary to a receptor of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput Aided Mol Des 5:153-174.
10. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T. 1995. Time-efficient docking of flexible ligands into active sites of proteins. ISMB-95:300-308.
11. Shoichet BK, Bodian DL, Kuntz ID. 1992. Molecular docking using shape descriptors. J Comput Chem 13(3):380-391.
12. Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID. 1991. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol 227:327-346.
13. Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID. 1993. Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking. Protein Eng 6(7):723-732.
14. Weber PC, Wendoloski JJ, Pantoliano MW, Salemme FR. 1992. Crystallographic and thermodynamic comparison of natural and synthetic ligands bound to streptavidin. J Am Chem Soc 114:3197-3200.
15. Welch W, Ruppert J, Jain A. 1996. Hammerhead: Fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein structures. Chemistry & Biology 3:449-462.