Unexpected sensitization efficiency of the near-infrared Nd3+, Er3+, and Yb3+ emission by fluorescein compared to eosin and erythrosin

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 107, Issue 14, 2003, Pages 2483-2491

  Hebbink, Gerald A ^a   Grave, Lennart ^a   Woldering, Léon A ^a   Reinhoudt, David N ^a   Van Veggel, Frank C J M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE EMISSION; ERBIUM; FLUORESCENCE; IODINE; YTTERBIUM;

EOSIN;

NEODYMIUM;

EID: 0037431293     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp0260090     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. For a review, see: Parker, D.; Williams, J. A. G. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1996, 3613.
2. De Sa, G. F.; Malta, O. L.; de Mello Donega, C.; Simas, A. M.; Longo, R. L.; Santa-Cruz, P. A.; da Silva, E. F., Jr. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 196, 165.
3. Steemers, F. J.; Verboom, W.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; van der Tol, E. B.; Verhoeven, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9408.
4. Hemmilä, I. K. Applications of Fluorescence in Immunoassays; Wiley and Sons: New York, 1991.
5. Klink, S. L; Grave, L.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Werts, M. H. V.; Geurts, F. A. J.; Hofstraat, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 5457.
6. Klink, S. I.; Hebbink, G. A.; Grave, L.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Slooff, L. H.; Polman, A.; Hofstraat, J. W. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 86, 1181.
7. Hasegawa, Y.; Ohkubo, T.; Sogabe, K.; Kawamura, Y.; Wada, Y.; Nakashima, N.; Yanagida, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 357.
8. Beeby, A.; Faulkner, S. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 266, 116.
9. Maupin, C. L.; Dickins, R. S.; Govenlook, L. G.; Mathieu, C. E.; Parker, D.; Williams, J. A. G.; Riehl, J. P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 6709.
10. Voloshin, A. I.; Shavaleev, N. M.; Kazakov, V. P. J. Lumin. 2001, 93, 115.
11. Slooff, L. H.; Polman, A.; Oude Wolbers, M. P.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Hofstraat, J. W. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 83, 497.
12. Werts, M. H. V.; Woudenberg, R. H.; Emmerink, P. G.; van Gassel, R.; Hofstraat, J. W.; Verhoeven, J. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4542.
13. Miniscalco, W. J. J. Lightwave Technol. 1991, 9, 234.
14. For an early paper, see: Meshkova, S. B.; Rusakova, N. V.; Bolshoi, D. V. Acta Chim. Hung. 1992, 729, 317.
15. Gschneidner, K. A.; Eyring, L. R. Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths; North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, 1979.
16. Lowe, M. P.; Parker, D. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2001, 317, 163.
17. Vögtle, F.; Gorka, M.; Vicinelli, V.; Ceroni, P.; Maestri, M.; Balzani, V. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2001, 769.
18. Hebbink; G. H.; Klink; S. I.; Grave, L.; Oude Alink, P. G. B.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. ChemPhysChem. 2002, 3, 1014.
19. Sabbatini, N.; Guardigli, M.; Lehn, J.-M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1993, 123, 201.
20. One of the referees argued that it should be efficiency of luminescence instead of quantum yield, because this value was not measured directly. However, as stated it is correct notwithstanding the fact that this value was indeed measured indirectly.
21. Sato, S.; Wada, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1970, 43, 1955.
22. Latva, M.; Takalo, H.; Mukkala, V. M.; Matachescu, C.; Rodriguez-Ubis, J. C.; Kankare, J. J. Lumin. 1997, 75, 149.
23. Werts, M. H. V.; Duin, M. A.; Hofstraat, J. W.; Verhoeven, J. W. Chem. Commun. 1999, 799.
24. Dadabhoy, A.; Faulkner, S.; Sammes, P. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000, 2359.
25. Stein, G.; Würzberg, E. J. Phys. Chem. 1975, 62, 208.
26. Horrocks, W. DeW.; Bolender, J. P.; Smith, W. D.; Supkowski, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5972.
27. Korovin, Y.; Rusakova, N. Rev. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 21, 299.
28. Oude Wolbers, M. P.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Peters, F. G. A.; van Beelen, E. S. E.; Hofstraat, J. W.; Geurts, F. A. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 772.
29. Werts, M. H. V.; Hofstraat, J. W.; Geurts, F. A. J.; Verhoeven, J. W. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 276, 196.
30. Klink, S. L; Oude Alink, P.; Grave, L.; Peters, F. G. A.; Hofstraat, J. W.; Geurts, F. A. J.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 363.
31. Wong, W. K.; Hou, A.; Guo, J.; He, H.; Zhang, L.; Wong, W. Y.; Li, K. F.; Cheah, K. W.; Xue, F.; Mak, T. C. W. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2001, 3092.
32. Beeby, A.; Dickins, R. S.; FitzGerald, S.; Govenlock, L. J.; Maupin, C. L.; Parker, D.; Riehl, J. P.; Siligardi, G.; Williams, J. A. G. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1183.
33. Klink, S. I.; Keizer, H.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4319.
34. Dexter, D. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21, 836.
35. Murov, S. L.; Carmichael, I.; Hug, G. L. Handbook of photochemistry, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1993.
36. van Houten, J.; Watts R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 4853.
37. Werts, M. H. V.; Verhoeven, J. W.; Hofstraat, J. W. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000, 433.
38. Hebbink, G. A.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 4101.
39. Klink, S. I.; Hebbink, G. A.; Oude Alink, P. G. B.; Grave, L.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Werts, M. H. V. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 3681.
40. (b) Hebbink, G. A.; Klink, S. I.; Oude Alink, P. G. B.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2001, 577, 114.
41. For the procedure, see: van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Oude Wolbers, M. P.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3060. For the Lennard Jones parameters for the lanthanide ions, see: van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 90.
42. For the procedure, see: van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Oude Wolbers, M. P.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3060. For the Lennard Jones parameters for the lanthanide ions, see: van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 90.
43. Jorgensen, W. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 1276 (OPLS stands for optimized potentials for liquid simulations).
44. The central carbon atom of the xanthene unit, at the para position to the oxygen in the central ring, was taken as a measure of the distance.
45. Slooff, L. H.; Polman, A.; Klink, S. I.; Hebbink, G. A.; Grave, L.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Hofstraat, J. W. Opt. Mater. 2000, 14, 101. Slooff, L. H.; Polman, A.; Hebbink, G. A.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Cacialli, F.; Friend, R. H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 2122.
46. Slooff, L. H.; Polman, A.; Klink, S. I.; Hebbink, G. A.; Grave, L.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Hofstraat, J. W. Opt. Mater. 2000, 14, 101. Slooff, L. H.; Polman, A.; Hebbink, G. A.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Cacialli, F.; Friend, R. H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 2122.
47. Horrocks, W. DeW.; Sudnick, D. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 384.
48. Beeby, A.; Clarkson, I. M.; Dickins, R. S.; Faulkner, S.; Parker, D.; Royle, L.; de Sousa, A. S.; Williams, J. A. G.; Woods, M. J. Chem, Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 493.
49. Klink, S. I; Hebbink, G. A.; Grave, L.; Peters, F. G. A.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Hofstraat, J. W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 192.
50. 3OD).
51. Ermolaev, V. L.; Sveshnikova, E. B. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1994, 63, 905.
52. Weber, M. J. Phys. Rev. 1968, 168, 283.
53. Polman, A. Physica B 2001, 300, 78.
54. 4.Gd at 77 K. Although the singlet -triplet absorption is relative weak, the excitation spectrum could easily be distinguished from the singlet - singlet excitation of the phosphorescence (cf. ref 35 p 54).
55. Delayed detection was accomplished by equipping the spectro-fluorimeter with a rotating drum. Doing so, a delay between excitation and emission of about 2 ms was accomplished. Compare ref 37.
56. Tobita, S.; Arakawa, M.; Tanaka, I. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 2697. Tobita, S.; Arakawa, M.; Tanaka, I. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 5649.
57. Tobita, S.; Arakawa, M.; Tanaka, I. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 2697. Tobita, S.; Arakawa, M.; Tanaka, I. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 5649.
58. Guldi, D. M.; Mody, T. D.; Gerasimchuk, N. N.; Magda, D.; Sessler, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8289.
59. Gonçalves e Silva, F. R.; Malta, O. L.; Reinhard, C.; Güdel, H. U.; Piguet, C.; Moser, J. E.; Bünzli, J.-C. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 1670.
60. Blasse, G.; Grabmaier B. C. Luminescent materials; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1994.
61. 3+ can be an acceptor level because of the selection rules. However, this level is higher in energy than the triplet states of the sensitizers and is therefore not taken in to account.
62. Sato, S.; Wada, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1970, 43, 1955.
63. The assumption here is that all other energy conversion processes are not temperature-dependent. This is not completely true, but the effects are much smaller than the temperature dependence of the back-tranfer rate (Turro, N. J. Modern Molecular Photochemistry; The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc.: Menlo Park, CA, 1978).
64. Payne, S. A.; Bibeau, C. J. Lumin. 1998, 79, 143.
65. Rehm, D.; Weller, A. Isr. J. Chem. 1970, 8, 259.
66. 3+ is expected to be even higher as the triple charged ion is stabilized by the ligand. This leads to even lower values of the driving force.
67. 3+ is expected to be even higher as the triple charged ion is stabilized by the ligand. This leads to even lower values of the driving force.
68. 2+) = -1.05 V (vs NHE), Lide, D. R., Ed.; Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 76th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1996.