-
6
-
-
13344267827
-
-
Barton D.H.R., Kirby G.W., Steglich W.G., Thomas M., Battersby A.R., Dobson T.A., Ramuz H. J. Chem. Soc. 1965;2423.
-
(1965)
J. Chem. Soc
, pp. 2423
-
-
Barton, D.H.R.1
Kirby, G.W.2
Steglich, W.G.3
Thomas, M.4
Battersby, A.R.5
Dobson, T.A.6
Ramuz, H.7
-
7
-
-
0023900351
-
-
Weber S., Brandom B.W., Powers D.M., Sarner J.B., Woelfel S.K., Cook D.R., Foster V.J., McNulty B.F., Weakly J.N. Anesth. Analg. 67:1988;495.
-
(1988)
Anesth. Analg.
, vol.67
, pp. 495
-
-
Weber, S.1
Brandom, B.W.2
Powers, D.M.3
Sarner, J.B.4
Woelfel, S.K.5
Cook, D.R.6
Foster, V.J.7
McNulty, B.F.8
Weakly, J.N.9
-
10
-
-
0034800793
-
-
Iwasa K., Moriyasu M., Tachibana Y., Kim H.S., Wataya Y., Wiegrebe W., Bastow K.F., Cosentino L.M., Kozuka M., Lee K.H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11:2001;2871.
-
(2001)
Bioorg. Med. Chem.
, vol.11
, pp. 2871
-
-
Iwasa, K.1
Moriyasu, M.2
Tachibana, Y.3
Kim, H.S.4
Wataya, Y.5
Wiegrebe, W.6
Bastow, K.F.7
Cosentino, L.M.8
Kozuka, M.9
Lee, K.H.10
-
12
-
-
0032986997
-
-
Penn R.B., Parent J.L., Pronin A.N., Panettieri R.A. Jr., Benovic J.L. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 288:1999;428.
-
(1999)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
, vol.288
, pp. 428
-
-
Penn, R.B.1
Parent, J.L.2
Pronin, A.N.3
Panettieri R.A., Jr.4
Benovic, J.L.5
-
13
-
-
0029816412
-
-
Lin C.H., Yang C.M., Chen C.M., Ko F.N., Teng C.M. Pharmacology. 53:1996;19.
-
(1996)
Pharmacology
, vol.53
, pp. 19
-
-
Lin, C.H.1
Yang, C.M.2
Chen, C.M.3
Ko, F.N.4
Teng, C.M.5
-
14
-
-
0001287983
-
-
Puia G., Santi M.R., Vicini S., Pritchett D.B., Seeburg P.H., Costa E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86:1989;7275.
-
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
, vol.86
, pp. 7275
-
-
Puia, G.1
Santi, M.R.2
Vicini, S.3
Pritchett, D.B.4
Seeburg, P.H.5
Costa, E.6
-
18
-
-
85031214903
-
-
note
-
abstract
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
0032778015
-
-
2) binding affinity assays: see: Huang Y.C., Yeh J.L., Wu B.N., Lo Y.C., Liang J.C., Lin Y.T., Sheu S.H., Chen I.J. Drug Develop. Res. 47:1999;77 (b) Lin Y.T., Wu B.N., Horng C.H., Huang Y.C., Horng S.J., Lo Y.C., Cheng C.J., Chen I.J. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 80:1999;127.
-
(1999)
Drug Develop. Res.
, vol.47
, pp. 77
-
-
Huang, Y.C.1
Yeh, J.L.2
Wu, B.N.3
Lo, Y.C.4
Liang, J.C.5
Lin, Y.T.6
Sheu, S.H.7
Chen, I.J.8
-
21
-
-
0032586808
-
-
2) binding affinity assays: see
-
2) binding affinity assays: see: Huang Y.C., Yeh J.L., Wu B.N., Lo Y.C., Liang J.C., Lin Y.T., Sheu S.H., Chen I.J. Drug Develop. Res. 47:1999;77 (b) Lin Y.T., Wu B.N., Horng C.H., Huang Y.C., Horng S.J., Lo Y.C., Cheng C.J., Chen I.J. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 80:1999;127.
-
(1999)
Jpn. J. Pharmacol.
, vol.80
, pp. 127
-
-
Lin, Y.T.1
Wu, B.N.2
Horng, C.H.3
Huang, Y.C.4
Horng, S.J.5
Lo, Y.C.6
Cheng, C.J.7
Chen, I.J.8
-
22
-
-
0028971416
-
-
(a) Cytotoxicity assay: Cancer cells were seeded in 96-well microtiter plates at a density of 6000/well in 100 μL culture medium. After an overnight adaptation period, 10 μM/mL (final concentration) of test compounds in serium-free medium were added to individual wells. Cells were treated with test compounds for three days. Cell viability was determined by the 5-(3-carbonylmethoxyphenyl)-2-(4,5-dimethylthazolyl)-3-(4-silfophenyl) tetrazolium salt (MTS) reduction. Actinomycin D 5μM (final concentration) and DMSO 0.1% (final concentration) were used as positive and vehicle controls. Results were expressed as percent of DMSO control. For details of the assay protocols, see: Gieni R.S., Li Y., HayGlass K.T. J. Immunol. Meth. 187:1995;85 (b) Malich G., Markovic B., Winder C. Toxicology. 124:1997;179.
-
(1995)
J. Immunol. Meth.
, vol.187
, pp. 85
-
-
Gieni, R.S.1
Li, Y.2
HayGlass, K.T.3
-
23
-
-
0031593138
-
-
Cytotoxicity assay: Cancer cells were seeded in 96-well microtiter plates at a density of 6000/well in 100 μL culture medium. After an overnight adaptation period, 10 μM/mL (final concentration) of test compounds in serium-free medium were added to individual wells. Cells were treated with test compounds for three days. Cell viability was determined by the 5-(3-carbonylmethoxyphenyl)-2-(4,5-dimethylthazolyl)-3-(4-silfophenyl) tetrazolium salt (MTS) reduction. Actinomycin D 5μM (final concentration) and DMSO 0.1% (final concentration) were used as positive and vehicle controls. Results were expressed as percent of DMSO control. For details of the assay protocols, see
-
(a) Cytotoxicity assay: Cancer cells were seeded in 96-well microtiter plates at a density of 6000/well in 100 μL culture medium. After an overnight adaptation period, 10 μM/mL (final concentration) of test compounds in serium-free medium were added to individual wells. Cells were treated with test compounds for three days. Cell viability was determined by the 5-(3-carbonylmethoxyphenyl)-2-(4,5-dimethylthazolyl)-3-(4-silfophenyl) tetrazolium salt (MTS) reduction. Actinomycin D 5μM (final concentration) and DMSO 0.1% (final concentration) were used as positive and vehicle controls. Results were expressed as percent of DMSO control. For details of the assay protocols, see: Gieni R.S., Li Y., HayGlass K.T. J. Immunol. Meth. 187:1995;85 (b) Malich G., Markovic B., Winder C. Toxicology. 124:1997;179.
-
(1997)
Toxicology
, vol.124
, pp. 179
-
-
Malich, G.1
Markovic, B.2
Winder, C.3
|