|
Volumn 986, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 227-238
|
Chemometric comparison of recent chromatographic and electrophoretic methods in a quantitative structure-retention and retention-activity relationship context
|
Author keywords
Immobilized artificial membranes; Principal component analysis; Quantitative retention activity relationships; Quantitative structure retention relationships
|
Indexed keywords
CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS;
HYDROPHOBICITY;
ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE COLUMNS;
DRUG PRODUCTS;
ACEBUTOLOL;
ALPRENOLOL;
ATENOLOL;
CARBAMAZEPINE;
CHLORPHENIRAMINE;
CHLORPROMAZINE;
CIMETIDINE;
CLONIDINE;
DESIPRAMINE;
DIPHENHYDRAMINE;
IMIPRAMINE;
KETOTIFEN;
METOPROLOL;
NADOLOL;
OCTANOL;
OXPRENOLOL;
PINDOLOL;
PROMAZINE;
PROPRANOLOL;
RANITIDINE;
THIORIDAZINE;
TRIFLUOPERAZINE;
WATER;
ARTICLE;
ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE;
CALIBRATION;
CHEMOMETRIC ANALYSIS;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT;
DEVICE;
DRUG STRUCTURE;
ELECTROPHORESIS;
HUMAN;
HUMAN CELL;
HYDROPHOBICITY;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MICELLAR ELECTROKINETIC CHROMATOGRAPHY;
MICELLAR LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;
PARTITION COEFFICIENT;
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;
QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;
REVERSED PHASE HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;
|
EID: 0037423011
PISSN: 00219673
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)02011-3 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (42)
|
References (23)
|