Development and validation of a simple risk score to predict the need for permanent pacing after cardiac valve surgery

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 795-801

  Koplan, Bruce A ^a   Stevenson, William G ^a   Epstein, Laurence M ^a   Aranki, Sary F ^a   Maisel, William H ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK; HEART PACING; HEART RIGHT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PR INTERVAL; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; TRICUSPID VALVE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0037420076     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02926-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Goldman BS, Hill TJ, Weisel RD, et al. Permanent cardiac pacing after open-heart surgery: acquired heart disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1984;7:367-71.
2. Zakhia Doueihi R, Leloux MF, De Roy L, Kremer R. Permanent cardiac pacing for prolonged second and third degree atrioventricular block complicating cardiac valve replacement. Acta Cardiologica 1992;47:157-66.
3. Lewis JW Jr., Webb CR, Pickard SD, Lehman J, Jacobsen G. The increased need for a permanent pacemaker after reoperative cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:74-81.
4. Keefe DL, Griffin JC, Harrison DC, Stinson EB. Atrioventricular conduction abnormalities in patients undergoing isolated aortic or mitral valve replacement. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1985;8:393-8.
5. Otaki M. Permanent cardiac pacing after cardiac operations. Artif Organs 1993;17:346-9.
6. Jaeger FJ, Trohman RG, Brener S, Loop F. Permanent pacing following repeat cardiac valve surgery. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:505-7.
7. Willems JL, Arnaus P, van Bemmel JH, et al. A reference data base for multilead electrocardiographic computer measurement programs. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:1313-21.
8. Kudenchuk PJ, Ho MT, Weaver WD, et al. Accuracy of computer-interpreted electrocardiography in selecting patients for thrombolytic therapy: MITI project investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:1486-91.
9. Glikson M, Dearani JA, Hyberger LK, Schaff HV, Hammill SC, Hayes DL. Indications, effectiveness, and long-term dependency in permanent pacing after cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:1309-13.
10. Del Nido P, Goldman B. Temporary epicardial pacing after open heart surgery: complications and prevention. J Cardiac Surg 1989;4:99-103.
11. Price C, Keenan D. Injury to a saphenous vein graft during removal of a temporary epicardial pacing wire electrode. Br Heart J 1989;61:546-7.
12. Gentry W, Hassan A. Complications of retained epicardial pacing wires: an unusual bronchial foreign body. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:1391-3.
13. Smith J, Tatoulis J. Right atrial perforation by a temporary epicardial pacing wire. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:141-2.
14. Gregoratos G, Cheitlin MD, Conill A, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1175-209.
15. Meimoun P, Zeghdi R, D'Attelis N, et al. Frequency, predictors, and consequences of atrioventricular block after mitral valve repair. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:1062-6.
16. Kim MH, Deeb GM, Eagle KA, et al. Complete atrioventricular block after valvular heart surgery and the timing of pacemaker implantation. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:649-51.
17. Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules: applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med 1985;313:793-9.
18. Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules: a review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA 1997; 277:488-94.