Probing specificity in carbohydrate-carbohydrate interactions with micelles and langmuir monolayers

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 95-98

  Santacroce, Paul V ^a   Basu, Amit ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbohydrates; Glycolipids; Membranes; Molecular recognition; Noncovalent interactions

Indexed keywords

EPIMERIZATION;

CELLS; LANGMUIR BLODGETT FILMS; LIPIDS; MICELLES; MONOLAYERS;

CARBOHYDRATES;

CARBOHYDRATE; GANGLIOSIDE GM3; GLYCOLIPID; HYDROXYL GROUP;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; EPIMERIZATION; MICELLE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; REACTION ANALYSIS;

1,2-DIPALMITOYLPHOSPHATIDYLCHOLINE; CARBOHYDRATES; CELLOBIOSE; G(M3) GANGLIOSIDE; GLYCOLIPIDS; LACTOSYLCERAMIDES; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MICELLES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PRESSURE; STEREOISOMERISM; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0037414924     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200390063     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. a) J. Rojo, J. C. Morales, S. Penadés, Top. Curr. Chem. 2002, 218, 45;
2. b) N. V. Bovin, Biochemistry (Moscow) 1996, 61, 694;
3. c) S. Hakomori, Pure Appl. Chem. 1991, 63, 473;
4. d) D. Spillman, M. M. Burger, J. Cell. Biochem. 1996, 61, 562.
5. a) J. E. Scott, F. Heatley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 4850;
6. b) R. J. Stewart, J. M. Boggs, Biochemistry 1993, 32, 10666;
7. c) S. R. Haseley, H. J. Vermeer, J. P. Kamerling, J. F. G. Vliegenthart, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 9419;
8. d) S. Yu, N. Kojima, S. Hakomori, S. Kudo, S. Inoue, Y. Inoue, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 2854.
9. Vesicle adhesion: a) R. J. Stewart, J. M. Boggs, Biochemistry 1993, 32, 10666;
10. b) F. Pincet, T. Le Bouar, Y. Zhang, J. Esnault, J.-M. Mallet, E. Perez, P. Sinaÿ, Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 1354;
11. SPR: c) K. Matsuura, H. Kitakouji, N. Sawada, H. Ishida, M. Kiso, K. Kitajima, K. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7406;
12. d) M. Hernáiz, J. M. de la Fuente, A. G. Barrientos, S. Penadés, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 1624; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1554;
13. d) M. Hernáiz, J. M. de la Fuente, A. G. Barrientos, S. Penadés, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 1624; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1554;
14. AFM: e) C. Tromas, J. Rojo, J. M. de la Fuente, A. G. Barrientos, R. García, S. Penadés, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3142; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3052;
15. AFM: e) C. Tromas, J. Rojo, J. M. de la Fuente, A. G. Barrientos, R. García, S. Penadés, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3142; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3052;
16. f) NMR: f) C. Gege, A. Geyer, R. R. Schmidt, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2475;
17. g) B. Henry, H. Desvaux, M. Pristchepa, P. Berthault, Y. M. Zhang, J. M. Mallet, J. Esnault, P. Sinay, Carbohydr. Res. 1999, 315, 48;
18. MS: h) K. M. Koshy, J. Wang, J. M. Boggs, Biophys. J. 1999, 77, 306;
19. i) G. Siuzdak, Z. L. Zheng, J. Y. Rhamphal, Y. Ichikawa, K. C. Nicolaou, F. C. Gaeta, K. S. Chatman, C. H. Wong, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1994, 4, 2863;
20. IR: j) J. M. Boggs, A. Menikh, G. Rangaraj, Biophys. J. 2000, 78, 874;
21. Surface force measurements: k) Z. W. Yu, T. L. Calvert, D. Leckband, Biochemistry 1998, 37, 1540;
22. QCM: l) K. Matsuura, H. Kitakouji, A. Tsuchida, N. Sawada, H. Ishida, M. Kiso, K. Kobayashi, Chem. Lett. 1998, 1293;
23. Langmuir compressions: m) K. Matsuura, H. Kitakouji, R. Oda, Y. Morimoto, H. Asano, H. Ishida, M. Kiso, K. Kitajima, K. Kobayashi, Langmuir 2002, 18, 6940.
24. a) N. Kojima, M. Shiota, Y. Sadahira, K. Handa, S. Hakomori, J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 17264;
25. b) N. Kojima, S. Hakomori, J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 17552;
26. c) K. Iwabuchi, S. Yamamura, A. Prinetti, K. Handa, S. Hakomori, J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 9130.
27. E. Otsuji, Y. S. Park, K. Tashiro, N. Kojima, T. Toyokuni, S. Hakomori, Int. J. Oncol. 1995, 6, 319.
28. B. Dean, H. Ogushi, S. Cai, E. Otsuji, K. Tashiro, S. Hakomori, T. Toyokuni, Carbohydr. Res. 1993, 245, 175.
29. a) S. Wang, R. M. Leblanc, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1419, 317;
30. b) A. Giehl, T. Lemm, O. Bartelsen, K. Sandhoff, A. Blume, Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 261, 650;
31. c) R. Villard, D. Hammache, G. Delapierre, F. Fotiadu, G. Buono, J. Fantini, ChemBioChem 2002, 3, 517;
32. d) J. Hernandez, R. Pouplana, J. Estelrich, J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 1988, 9, 223;
33. e) H. Zhao, A. C. Rinaldi, A. D. Giulio, M. Simmaco, P. K J. Kinnunen, Biochemistry 2002, 41, 4425;
34. f) I. J. Vereyken, V. Chupin, R. A. Demel, S. C. M. Smeekens, B. D. Kurijff, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1510, 307;
35. for an overview of the applications of lipid monolayers, see g) H. Brockman, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1999, 9, 438.
36. a) C. M. Knobler, Adv. Chem. Phys. 1990, 77, 397;
37. b) S. Heyse, T. Stora, E. Schmid, J. H. Lakey, H. Vogel, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 85 507, 319;
38. c) C. Yuan, L. J. Johnston, Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 2768;
39. d) J. C. Conboy, K. D. McReynolds, J. Gervay-Hague, S. S. Saavedra, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 968.
40. N. Kojima, B. Fenderson, M. Stroud, R. Goldberg, R. Habermann, T. Toyokuni, S. Hakomori, Glycoconjugate J. 1994, 11, 238.
41. 13C NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry.
42. A. Chattopadhyay, E. London, Anal. Biochem. 1984, 139, 408.
43. -1 until the desired initial monolayer pressure for the binding experiment was reached. Once the monolayer was at the target pressure the barriers were stopped, and the subphase was stirred gently outside the barriers. The binding experiment was initiated by injection of 1.5 mL of a concentrated glycolipid solution into the subphase outside the Teflon barriers.
44. Negative Δπ values are indicative of either lipid loss from the monolayers owing to the high solubility of the glycolipids and/or rearrangements within the monolayer after compression has ceased. See a) J. Esnault, J.-M. Mallet, Y. Zhang, P. Sinaÿ, T. LeBouar, F. Pincet, E. Perez, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 253; b) G. L. Gaines, Insoluble Monolayers at Liquid-Gas Interfaces, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1966, p. 143.
45. Negative Δπ values are indicative of either lipid loss from the monolayers owing to the high solubility of the glycolipids and/or rearrangements within the monolayer after compression has ceased. See a) J. Esnault, J.-M. Mallet, Y. Zhang, P. Sinaÿ, T. LeBouar, F. Pincet, E. Perez, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 253; b) G. L. Gaines, Insoluble Monolayers at Liquid-Gas Interfaces, Interscience Publishers, New York, 1966, p. 143.
46. Single-site modifications can have measurable effects on CCIs. For examples in the context of glycopolymer recognition, see references [3 c,1, m].
47. a) W. Cook, C. Bugg, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1975, 389, 428;
48. b) W. Cook, C. Bugg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 6442.
49. 2, as might be expected in a solution of greater ionic strength.
50. -1, respectively.
51. -1 and a cmc of 3 μM, also failed to show a concentration-dependent increase in Δπ.
52. 3 which suggests that CCIs facilitate insertion by targeting the glycolipids to the interface. These observations indicate that in the absence of CCIs intrinsic surface activity becomes the primary contributor to Δπ.
53. -1. At all other pressures examined the Δπ value was indistinguishable from the values observed in a "holding" experiment.