Seeing the Fetus: The Role of Technology and Image in the Maternal-Fetal Relationship

JAMA

Volumn 289, Issue 13, 2003, Pages 1700-

  Stormer, Nathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER MODEL; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS; HUMAN; IMAGING; MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY; ARTICLE; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; PREGNANCY;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MATERNAL-FETAL RELATIONS; PREGNANCY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 0037414221     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.13.1700     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Nash JM. Inside the womb. Time. [serial online]. Available at: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101021111-386944,00.html. Accessed November 16, 2002.
2. Duden B. Disembodying Women. Hoinacki L, trans. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1993.
3. Fasouliotis SJ, Schenker JG. Maternal-fetal conflict. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 2000;89:101-107.
4. Casper MJ. The Making of the Unborn Patient: A Social Anatomy of Fetal Surgery. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1998.
5. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The fetus as a patient: an essential ethical concept for maternal-fetal medicine. J Matern Fetal Med, 1996;5:115-119.
6. Pateman C. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 1988.
7. Petchesky RP. Fetal images: the power of the visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies. 1987;13:263-292.
8. Stormer N. Embodying normal miracles. Q J Speech. 1997;83:172-179.
9. Martin E. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, Mass: Beacon Press; 1987.
10. Lloyd GER. Science, Folklore, and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1983.