Brief cognitive assessment and prediction of functional outcome in stroke

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 10-21

  Larson, Eric B ^a   Kirschner, Kristi ^a   Bode, Rita K ^a   Heinemann, Allen W ^a   Clorfene, Jeremy ^b   Goodman, Rebecca ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Santa Barbara County School District   (United States)

Author keywords

Functional outcome; Neuropsychological assessment; Quality of life; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0037413232     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/84YN-Y640-8UEQ-PDNV     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke. 1986;17:765-776.
2. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60: II. Prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957;2:200-214.
3. Katz S, Ford AB, Chinn AB, Newill VA. Part II: Long term course of 159 patients. Medicine. 1966;45:236-246.
4. Anderson TP, Boursestom N, Greenberg FR, Hildyard VG. Predictive factors in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1974;55:545-553.
5. Nakayama H, Jorgensen H, Raaschou H, Olsen TS. The influence of age on stroke outcome: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. 1994;25:808-813.
6. Jeminez J, Morgan P. Predictive improvement in stroke patients referred for inpatient rehabilitation. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121:1481-1484.
7. Bruell JH, Simon JI. Development of objective predictors of recovery in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1960;41: 564-569.
8. Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller JM, Robinson M. Factors influencing stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1971;3:213-218.
9. Kaplan J, Hier D. Visuospatial deficits after right hemisphere stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 1982;36:314-421.
10. Hertanu JS, Demopoulos JT, Yang WC, Calhoun WF, Fenigstein HA. Stroke rehabilitation: correlation and prognostic value of computerized tomography and sequential functional assessments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;65:505-508.
11. Carroll D. The disability in hemiplegia caused by cerebrovascular disease: serial studies of 98 cases. J Chronic Dis. 1962;15: 179-188.
12. Kaste M, Waltimo O. Prognosis of patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 1976;7:482-485.
13. Wade DT, Skilbeck CF, Langton Hewer R. Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64:24-27.
14. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1989;21:241-246.
15. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Orientation in the acute and chronic stroke patient: impact of ADL and social activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:336-339.
16. Tatemichi TK, Desmond YS, Paik MS, Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57:202-207.
17. Galski T, Bruno RL, Zorowitz R, Walker J. Predicting length of stay, functional outcome, and aftercare in the rehabilitation of stroke patients: the dominant role of higher-order cognition. Stroke. 1993;24:1794-1800.
18. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinicians. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.
19. Mysiw WJ, Beegan JG, Gatens PF. Prospective cognitive assessment of stroke patients before inpatient rehabilitation: the relationship of the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination to functional improvement. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;68:168-171.
20. Northern California Neurobehavioral Group, Inc. Manual for COGNISTAT: The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination. Fairfax, CA: Northern California Neurobehavioral Group; 1995.
21. Jacobs JW, Bernhard MR, Delgado A, Strain JJ. Screening for organic mental syndromes in the medically ill. Ann Intern Med. 1977; 86:40-46.
22. Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale (DRS). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988.
23. Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Assessment: neuropsychological testing of adults. Considerations for neurologists. Neurology. 1996;47:592-599.
24. Stewart KJ, Gale SD, Diamond PT. Early assessment of post-stroke patients entering acute inpatient rehabilitation: utility of the WASI and HVLT-R. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:223-228.
25. Randolph C. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). New York: The Psychological Corporation; 1998.
26. Wilk CM, Gold JM, Bartko JJ, et al. Test-retest stability of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159: 838-844.
27. Gold JM, Queem C, Iannone VN, Buchanan RW. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a screening test in schizophrenia, I: Sensitivity, reliability and validity. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1937-1950.
28. Hobart MP, Goldberg R, Bartko JJ, Gold JM. Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status as a screening test in schizophrenia, II: Convergent/discriminant validity and diagnostic group comparisons. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1951-1957.
29. Gordon K, Terryberry-Spohr L, List Kalnins T. Predicting Rehabilitation Outcome Using Full and Reduced Versions of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). Poster presentation at: Meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society; February 1999; Boston, MA.
30. Terryberry-Spohr L, Gordon K, List Kalnins T. Prediction of Functional Outcomes in the Acute Rehabilitation Setting Using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). Poster presentation at: Meeting of National Academy of Neuropsychology; November 1999; San Antonio, TX.
31. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielzny M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ, ed. Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Baltimore: Brookes; 1987:137-147.
32. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75: 127-132.
33. Granger CV, Hamilton BB. Measurement of stroke rehabilitation outcome in the 1980s. Stroke. 1990;21(suppl II):46-47.
34. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Granger CV, Kayton RM. Interrater agreement of the seven level functional independence measure (FIM). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:790.
35. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Aging. 1983;12:166-170.
36. Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Langton-Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7:176-181.
37. Schuling J, deHaan R, Limburg M, Groenier KH. The Frenchay Activities Index: assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. 1993;24:1173-1177.
38. Fugl-Meyer AR, Eklund M, Fugl-Meyer KS. Vocational rehabilitation in Northern Sweden III: Aspects of life satisfaction. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1991;23:83-87.
39. Whiteneck GG, Charliufe SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Guide for Use of the CHART: Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Englewood, CO: Craig Hospital; 1992.
40. Whiteneck GG, Charliufe SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519-525.
41. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Boudewijn JK, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke - A critical review of the literature. Age Ageing. 1996;25:479-489.
42. Linacre JM. BIGSTEPS for PC Compatibles. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1997.
43. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Denmark's Paedogigiske Institute; 1960. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980)
44. Hall KM, Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Krause JS. The Craig Hospital Assessment. and Reporting Technique (CHART): Metric properties and scoring. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 1998;4:16-30.
45. Hoye W, Thompson RN, Sherer M, Nick T, Gaines C, Collip D, Vohra R. Brief cognitive assessment after stroke: RBANS factor structure and performance patterns [abstract]. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000;6:138.
46. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH). Geneva: WHO; 1980.
47. Albrecht GL, Devlieger PJ. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:977-988.
48. Ganzini L, Johnson WS, Hoffman WF. Correlates of suffering in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 1999;52:1434-1440.
49. Kerns KA, Mateer CA. Walking and chewing gum: the impact of attentional capacity on everyday activities. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, eds. Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing. Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press; 1996:147-170.
50. Cubic BA, Gouvier W. The ecological validity of perceptual tests. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, eds. Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing. Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press; 1996:203-224.
51. Crosson B. Assessment of subtle language deficits in neuropsychological batteries: strategies and implications. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, eds. Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing. Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press; 1996:243-260.
52. Heaton RK, Pendleton MG. Use of neuropsychological tests to predict patients' everyday functioning. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981;49: 807-821.
53. Chelune GJ, Moehle KA. Neuropsychological assessment and everyday functioning. In: Wedding D, Horton AM, Webster J, eds. The Neuropsychology Handbook (pp. 489-525). New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1986:489-525.
54. Acker MB. A review of the ecological validity of neuropsychological tests. In: Tupper DE, Cicerone KD, eds. The Neuropsychology of Everyday Life: Assessment and Basic Competencies. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press; 1990:19-55.
55. Goldstein G. Functional considerations in neuropsychology. In: Sbordone RJ, Long CJ, eds. Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing. Delray Beach, FL: GR Press/St. Lucie Press; 1996:75-89.