Carryover in sensory trials

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 299-304

  Ferris, S J ^a   Kempton, R A ^a   Muir, D D ^b  

^a Biomathematics and Statistics for Scotland 'BioSS'   (United Kingdom)

^b HANNAH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cheese; Contrast effect; Neighbour balanced designs; Repeated measures

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; CHEESE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; SAMPLING; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSORY EVALUATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASTE;

EID: 0037409478     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00090-3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bruvold, W. H. (1970). Rated acceptability of mineral taste in water: III contrast and position effects in quality scale ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85 258-263.
2. Cross, D. V. (1973). Sequential dependencies and regression in psychophysical judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 14 547-552.
3. DeCarlo, L. T. (1992). Intertrial interval and sequential effects in magnitude scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18 1080-1088.
4. DeCarlo, L. T., & Cross, D. V. (1990). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: models and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119 375-396.
5. Durier, C., Monod, H., & Bruetschy, A. (1997). Design and analysis of factorial sensory experiments with carry-over effects. Food Quality and Preference, 8 141-149.
6. Ferris, S. J. (1999). Response models and efficient designs for change-over experiments with treatment carryover. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, UK.
7. Ferris, S. J., Kempton, R. A., Deary, I. J., Austin, E. J., & Shotter, M. V. (2001). Carryover bias in visual assessment. Perception, 30 1363-1373.
8. Hedayat, A., & Afsarinejad, K. (1978). Repeated measurements designs II. Annals of Statistics, 6 619-628.
9. Kamenetzky, J. (1959). Contrast and convergence effects in ratings of foods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43 47-52.
10. Kempton, R. A., Ferris, S. J., & David, O. (2001). Optimal change-over designs when carry-over effects are proportional to direct effects of treatments. Biometrika, 88 391-399.
11. Mead, R., & Gay, C. (1995). Sequential design of sensory trials. Food Quality and Preference, 6 271-280.
12. Muir, D. D., & Hunter, E. A. (1991). Sensory evaluation of cheddar cheese: order of tasting and carryover effects. Food Quality and Preference, 3 141-145.
13. Riskey, D. R., Parducci, A., & Beauchamp, G. K. (1979). Effects of context in judgments of sweetness and pleasantness. Perception and Psychophysics, 26 171-176.
14. Schifferstein, H. N., & Frijters, J. E. R. (1992). Contextual and sequential effects on judgments of sweetness intensity. Perception and Psychophysics, 52 243-255.
15. Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Kuiper, W. E. (1997). Sequence effects in hedonic judgments of taste stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 56 900-912.
16. Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Oudejans, I. M. (1996). Determinants of cumulative successive contrast in saltiness intensity judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 58 713-724.
17. Schlich, P. (1993). Uses of change-over designs and repeated measurements in sensory and consumer studies. Food Quality and Preference, 4 223-235.
18. Stone, H., & Sidel, J. L. (1993). Sensory evaluation practices. London: Academic Press.
19. Wakeling, I. N., & MacFie, H. J. H. (1995). Designing consumer trials balanced for first and higher orders of carry-over effect when only a subset of k samples from t may be tested. Food Quality and Preference, 6 299-308.
20. Williams, E. J. (1949). Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Australian Journal Scientific Research, A2, 149-168.