Sequence effects in hedonic judgments of taste stimuli

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 900-912

  Schifferstein, Hendrik N J ^a   Kuiper, W Erno ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; TASTE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TASTE;

EID: 0031205697     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03205507     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. BACON, M. M., ROOD, E. A., & WASHBURN, M. F. (1914). A study of affective contrast. American Journal of Psychology, 25, 290-293.
2. BAIRD, J. C., BERGLUND, B., & OLSSON, M. J. (1996). Magnitude estimation of perceived odor intensity: Empirical and theoretical properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 244-255.
3. BAIRD, J. C., GREEN, D. M., & LUCE, R. D. (1980). Variability and sequential effects in cross-modality matching of area and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 277-289.
4. BECKNELL, J. C., WILSON, W. R., & BAIRD, J. C. (1963). The effect of frequency of presentation on the choice of nonsense syllables. Journal of Psychology, 56, 165-170.
5. BEEBE-CENTER, J. G. (1929). The law of affective equilibrium. American Journal of Psychology, 41, 54-69.
6. BERLYNE, D. E. (1973). The vicissitudes of aplopathematic and thelematoscopic pneumatology (or the hydrography of hedonism). In D. E. Berlyne & K. B. Madsen (Eds.), Pleasure, reward, preference: Their nature, determinants, and role in behavior (pp. 1-33). New York: Academic Press.
7. BRUVOLD, W. H. (1970). Rated acceptability of mineral taste in water: III. Contrast and position effects in quality scale ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 258-263.
8. CABANAC, M. (1971). Physiological role of pleasure. Science, 173, 1103-1107.
9. DECARLO, L. T. (1992). Intertrial interval and sequential dependencies in magnitude scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1080-1088.
10. DECARLO, L. T. (1994). A dynamic theory of proportional judgment: Context and judgment of length, heaviness, and roughness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 372-381.
11. DECARLO, L. T., & CROSS, D. V. (1990). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: Models and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 375-396.
12. DURBIN, J., & WATSON, G. S. (1950). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression, I. Biometrika, 37, 409-427.
13. DURBIN, J., & WATSON, G. S. (1951). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression, II. Biometrika, 38, 159-178.
14. GODFREY, L. G. (1988). Misspecification tests in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. GREEN, D. M., LUCE, R. D., & DUNCAN, J. E. (1977). Variability and sequential effects in magnitude production and estimation of auditory intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 450-456.
16. GREGSON, R. A. M. (1976). Psychophysical discontinuity and pseudosequence effects. Acta Psychologica, 40, 431-451.
17. GREGSON, R. A. M. (1983). The sequential structure of odour mixture component intensity judgements. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 36, 132-144.
18. HARRIS, A. J. (1929). An experiment on affective contrast. American Journal of Psychology, 41, 617-624.
19. HAUBENSAK, G. (1990). Primacy effects in absolute judgments. In H. G. Geissler (Ed.), Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 104-113). Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber.
20. HAUBENSAK, G. (1992). Sequenzeffekte in absoluten Urteilen? Kritisches zur Methode [Sequence effects in absolute judgments? A critique on the method]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 39, 101-113.
21. HELSON, H. (1973). A common model for affectivity and perception: An adaptation-level approach. In D. E. Berlyne & K. B. Madsen (Eds.), Pleasure, reward, preference: Their nature, determinants, and role in behavior (pp. 167-188). New York: Academic Press.
22. HOLLAND, M. K., & LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 3, 409-414.
23. JARQUE, C. M., & BERA, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, heteroscedasticity and serial dependence of regression residuals. Economic Letters, 6, 255-259.
24. JESTEADT, W., LUCE, R. D., & GREEN, D. M. (1977). Sequential effects in judgments of loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 92-104.
25. KROEZE, J. H. A. (1983). Successive contrast cannot explain suppression release after repetitious exposure to one of the components of a taste mixture. Chemical Senses, 8, 211-223.
26. LUCAS, A. (1993). RIPE - Robust inference plus estimation [Computer program]. Rotterdam: Erasmus University, Tinbergen Institute.
27. LUCAS, A. (1996). Outlier robust unit root analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University, Tinbergen Institute.
28. MADDALA, G. S. (1992). Introduction to econometrics (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
29. MORI, S., & WARD, L. M. (1990). Unmasking the magnitude estimation response. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 58-68.
30. MORRIS, R. B., & RULE, S. J. (1988). Sequential judgement effects in magnitude estimation. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 69-77.
31. PANGBORN, R. M. (1980). A critical analysis of sensory responses to sweetness. In P. Koivistoinen & L. Hyvönen (Eds.), Carbohydrate sweeteners in food and nutrition (pp. 87-110). London: Academic Press.
32. PARDUCCI, A., & WEDELL, D. H. (1986). The category effect with rating scales: Number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 496-516.
33. PETZOLD, P. (1981). Distance effects on sequential dependencies on categorial judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 1371-1385.
34. PLINER, P., POLIVY, J., HERMAN, C. P., & ZAKALUSNY, I. (1980). Short-term intake of overweight individuals and normal weight dieters and non-dieters with and without choice among a variety of foods. Appetite, 1, 203-213.
35. POULTON, E. C. (1979). Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 777-803.
36. RISKEY, D. R., PARDUCCI, A., & BEAUCHAMP, G. K. (1979). Effects of context in judgments of sweetness and pleasantness. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 171-176.
37. ROLLS, B. J., ROLLS, E. T., ROWE, E. A., & SWEENEY, K. (1981). Sensory specific satiety in man. Physiology & Behavior, 27, 137-142.
38. ROUSSEEUW, P. J., & VAN ZOMEREN, B. C. (1990). Unmasking multivariate outliers and leverage points. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 633-639.
39. SAUVAGEOT, F. (1990). Fatigue in sensory evaluation: Myth or reality? In G. Charalambous (Ed.), Flavors and off-flavors (pp. 577-594). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
40. SCHIFFERSTEIN, H. N. J. (1995). Contextual shifts in hedonic judgments. Journal of Sensory Studies, 10, 381-392.
41. SCHIFFERSTEIN, H. N. J., & FRIJTERS, J. E. R. (1992a). Contextual and sequential effects on judgments of sweetness intensity. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 243-255.
42. SCHIFFERSTEIN, H. N. J., & FRIJTERS, J. E. R. (1992b). Sweetness does not habituate during a sip-and-spit experiment. Physiology & Behavior, 51, 331-336.
43. SCHIFFERSTEIN, H. N. J., & OUDEJANS, I. M. (1996). Determinants of cumulative successive contrast in saltiness intensity judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 713-724.
44. STANG, D. J. (1975). When familiarity breeds contempt, absence makes the heart grow fonder: Effects of exposure and delay on taste pleasantness ratings. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 273-275.
45. TREISMAN, M., & WILLIAMS, T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68-111.
46. VOLLMECKE, T. A. (1987). The influence of context on sweetness and pleasantness evaluations of beverages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
47. WARD, L. M. (1979). Stimulus information and sequential dependencies in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 444-459.
48. WARD, L. M. (1982). Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling: Sequential dependencies and other properties. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 53-62.
49. WARD, L. M. (1985). Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling: Inter-and intramodality sequential dependencies as a function of lag. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 512-522.
50. WARD, L. M., & LOCKHEAD, G. R. (1970). Sequential effects and memory in category judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 27-34.
51. ZAJONC, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Monographs, 9 (2, Pt. 2), 1-28.
52. ZAJONC, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking. Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.