Future directions in air quality research: Economic issues

Environment International

Volumn 29, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 289-302

  Adams, Richard M ^a   Horst Jr , Robert L ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Benefits and costs; Economic assessment method; Education; Markets; Nonmarket; Service flows

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; ECONOMICS; EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; OZONE;

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS;

AIR QUALITY;

OZONE;

AIR QUALITY; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; OZONE;

AGRICULTURE; AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH; REVIEW;

EID: 0037408851     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00187-3     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Abt Associates, Ozone NAAQS benefit analysis: California crops. Report to the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1997.
2. Adams R. Agriculture, forestry, and related benefits of air pollution control: a review and some observations. Am J Agric Econ 1986;68:464-72.
3. Adams R, Crocker T. The agricultural economics of environmental change: some lessons from air pollution. J Environ Manag 1989;28:295-307.
4. Adams D, Haynes R. The 1993 timber assessment market model: structure, projection and policy. Technical Report PNW-GTR-368. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1996.
5. Adams R, Rowe R. The economic effects of stratospheric ozone depletion on U.S. agriculture: a preliminary assessment. J Environ Manag 1990; 30:321-35.
6. Adams R, Callaway J, McCarl B. Pollution, agriculture and social welfare: the case of acid rain. Can J Agric Econ 1986a;34:3-19.
7. Adams R, Hamilton S, McCarl B. The benefits of pollution control: the case of ozone and U.S. agriculture. Am J Agric Econ 1986b;68: 886-93.
8. Adams R, Glyer J, McCarl B. The NCLAN economic assessment: approach, findings, and implications. In: Heck W, Tingey D, Taylor O, editors. Assessment of crop loss from air pollutants. London: Elsevier; 1988. p. 473-504.
9. Adams RM, Glyer JD, McCarl BA, Johnson SL. A reassessment of the economic effects of ozone on U.S. agriculture. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 1989;39:960-8.
10. Anderson E. The ethical limitations of the market. Econ Philos 1990;6: 179-205.
11. Bentley J, Horst R. Commercial forestry benefits of alternative emission controls for the Nox SIP Call. SAIC Contract #68-D-98-113. Report prepared for the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1998. 19 pp.
12. Bergstrom JC. Concepts and measures of the economic value of environmental quality: a review. J Environ Manag 1990;31:215-28.
13. Braden JB, Kolstad CD, editors. Measuring the demand for environmental quality. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1991. 370 pp.
14. Callaway JM, Darwin RF, Neese RJ. Economic valuation of acidic deposition: preliminary results from the 1985 NAPAP assessment. National acid precipitation assessment program. Richland, WA: Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories and Washington, DC: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1985.
15. Carpenter RA, Dixon JA. Ecology meets economics: a guide to sustainable development. Environment 1985;27:6-32.
16. Common M, Perrings C. Towards an ecological economics of sustainability. Ecol Econ 1992;6:7-34.
17. Costanza R, Daly HE, Bartholomew JA. Goals, agenda and policy recommendations for ecological economics. In: Costanza R, editor. Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. New York: Columbia Univ. Press; 1991.
18. Costanza R, d'Arge R, deGroot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997;387:253-9.
19. Crocker TD. On the economic value of a forest stock. Land Econ 1985;61: 244-54.
20. Crocker T, Forster B. Atmospheric pollution-induced forest damages: issues in designing decision strategies. Water Air Soil Pollut 1986; 31:1007-9.
21. Cropper ML. Has economic research answered the needs of environmental policy? J Environ Econ Manage 2000;39:250-328.
22. DeSteiguer J, Pye JM, Love ES. Air pollution damages to U.S. forests. J For 1990;88:17-22.
23. Fox S, Mickler R, editors. Impacts of air pollutants on southern pine forests. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1996. 513 pp.
24. Fox S, Mickler R, editors. The productivity and sustainability of southern forest ecosystems in a changing environment. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1998. 892 pp.
25. Garcia P, Dixon B, Mjelde J, Adams R. Measuring the benefits of environmental change using a duality approach: the case of ozone and Illinois cash grain farms. J Environ Econ Manage 1986;13: 69-80.
26. Haynes RW, Adam DM. Assessing economic impacts of air pollution damage to U.S. forests. In: DeSteiguer JE, editor. The economic impact of air pollution on timber markets. General Technical Report SE-75. Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1992.
27. Heck WW, Adams RM, Cure WW, Heagle AS, Heggestad HE, Kohut RJ, Kress LW, Rawlings JO, Taylor OC. A reassessment of crop loss from ozone. Environ Sci Technol 1983;17:572-81.
28. Heck WW, Taylor OC, Tingey DT, editors. Assessment of crop loss from air pollutants. New York: Elsevier; 1998. 552 pp.
29. Heck WW, Furiness CS, Cowling EB, Sims CK. Effects of ozone on crop, forest, and natural ecosystems. EM Publication, Washington, DC. The Air and Waste Manage Assoc; 1998. p. 11-22. October.
30. Karr J. Biological monitoring and environmental assessment: a conceptual framework. Environ Manage 1986;11:249-56.
31. Kopp R, Krupnick A. Agricultural policy and the benefits of ozone control. Am J Agric Econ 1987;69:956-62.
32. Kopp R, Vaughn W, Hazilla M, Carson R. Implications of environmental policy for U.S. agriculture: the case of ambient ozone standards. J Environ Econ Manage 1985;20:321-31.
33. Laurence J, Kohut R, Amundson R. Use of TREGRO to simulate the effects of ozone on the growth of red spruce seedlings. For Sci 1993; 39:453-64.
34. Laurence JA, Retzlaff WA, Kern JS, Lee EH, Hogsett WE, Weinstein DA. Predicting the regional impact of ozone and precipitation on the growth of loblolly pine and yellow-poplar using linked TREGRO and ZELIG models. For Ecol Manag 2001;146:251-67.
35. Lee EH, Hogsett WE. Methodology for impacts for secondary standard benefit analyses: Part II. Report prepared for Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1996 March 18. p. 1-9.
36. Lefohn AS, Ottmans SJ, Dann T, Singh HR. Present day variability of background ozone in the lower troposphere. J Geophys Res 2001; 106:945-58.
37. Mathtech, The Regional Model Farm (RMF): an agricultural sector benefits assessment model: Version 3.0 for personal computers. Contract #68-D3-0030. Report to the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1994, September. 83 pp. plus appendix.
38. Mathtech, Regional Model Farm (RMF) update: second addendum to RMF user's guide. Contract #68-D3-0030. Report to the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1997, October. p. 1-20.
39. McGartland A. The implications of ambient ozone standards for U.S. agriculture: a comment and some further evidence. J Environ Manag 1987; 20:139-46.
40. Pearce D. Economic values and the natural world. London (England): Earthscan Publications; 1993. 129 pp.
41. Polasky S, editor. The economics of biodiversity conservation. Burlington (VT, USA): Ashgate Publishers; 2001. 466 pp.
42. Retzlaff WA, Weinstein DA, Laurence JA, Gollanda B. Simulated root dynamics of a 160-year-old sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) tree with and without ozone exposure using the TREGRO model. Tree Physiol 1996;16:915-21.
43. Samuelson P. Foundations of economic analysis. (6th printing) New York: Athenium; 1972. 447 p.
44. Segerson K. Impacts of ozone and acid rain: discussion. Am J Agric Econ 1987;69:970-1.
45. Shortle J, Dunn J, Phillips M. Economic assessment of crop damage due to air pollution: the role of quality effects. Environ Pollut Series: Ecol Biol. vol. 53. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Elsevier; 1986. p. 377-85.
46. Suter GW. Endpoints for regional ecological risk assessments. Environ Manage 1990;14:9-23.
47. Taylor CR, Reichelderfer KH, Johnson SR. Agricultural sector models for the United States: descriptions and selected policy applications. Ames (IA): Iowa State Univ Press; 1993.
48. Tomek WG. Confirmation and replication in empirical econometrics. Am J Agric Econ 1993;75:6-14.
49. Urban DL, Bonan GB, Smith TM, Shugart HH. Spatial applications of gap models. For Ecol Manag 1991;42:95-110.
50. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air quality criteria for ozone and related photochemical oxidants. EPA/600/P-93/004a-cF. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1996a. p. 5-227-38.
51. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Review of national ambient air quality standards for ozone: assessment of scientific and technical information. EPA-452/R-96-007. Research Triangle Park, NC: Staff Paper, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1996b. p. 222-69.
52. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Regulatory impact analysis for the particulate matter and ozone national ambient air quality standards and proposed regional haze rule. Prepared by the Innovative Strategies and Economics Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1997. p. 12-52-6.
53. Weinstein DA, Beloin RM, Yanai RD. Modeling changes in red spruce carbon balance and allocation in response to interacting ozone and nutrient stress. Tree Physiol 1991;9:127-46.
54. Weinstein DA, Samuelson IJ, Arthur MA. Comparison of the response of red oak (Quercus rubra) seedlings and mature trees to ozone exposure using simulation modeling. Environ Pollut 1998;102:307-20.
55. Weinstein DA, Gollards B, Retzlaff WA. The effects of ozone on a lower slope forest of the Great Smoky Mountain National Park: simulations linking an individual tree model to a stand model. For Sci 2001; 47:29-42.